This paper examines how training and development can serve as an effective tool for strengthening employee skills, with a focus on interpersonal relations. Using a case study of "David," a high-performing but interpersonally difficult employee, the paper analyzes on-the-job training methods, the role of reciprocity in building organizational commitment, and how social identity theory informs training design. The paper also reviews key paradoxes in human capital management and discusses evaluation methods for measuring training effectiveness. Drawing on multiple empirical studies, it concludes that a comprehensive HR strategy combining targeted training with organizational support can improve both individual behavior and overall workforce productivity.
Training and development is crucial to the growth and success of any organization. This paper analyzes how training and development can be used as an effective tool to strengthen the skills that an employee needs to improve upon in order to better perform on the job. Although there is clear evidence that training is positively associated with better job performance, the relationship between performance and training is complex. Several key paradoxes of organizational and employee freedoms and needs are revealed, and an evaluation of specific training and development recommendations is performed.
One of a company's most valuable assets is its employees. The value of human capital cannot be underestimated, nor should it be. Employees are the backbone of an organization. Ill-equipped and poorly trained employees can lead to organizational failure. Training and development is one of several ways that organizations help ensure their workers have the requisite skills for today and tomorrow. Understanding how to work through these paradoxes to offer meaningful, effective, and comprehensive training and development opportunities is no easy task. However, the management of human capital is filled with paradoxes: everyone agrees in principle that people are essential, yet they are often taken for granted in organizations; people may value freedom very highly, but in the end they work for organizations that significantly reduce it; individuals and organizations need each other, but human happiness and organizational rationality often conflict (Berman et al., p. 3). Nevertheless, if organizations truly value human capital and are willing to put forth the time and resources needed to implement programs and policies that support the intellectual, emotional, and professional growth of their employees, it is a significant step in the right direction.
David works for the city and is a star performer who frequently irritates his coworkers and managers. For his appraisal, David's supervisor rated him "low" in the interpersonal relations category. Given that David's performance is exceptional but his interpersonal skills are lacking, should the city provide David with training and development, and if so, which programs and policies might be beneficial to David, his colleagues, and the city?
Training is an essential facet with respect to both the organization and its employees. It offers employees better job security as well as the opportunity to advance their careers. Skills acquired through training are important assets for both the employee and the organization. The benefits linked with training endure for a prolonged duration, as skills acquired through training may only become obsolete in the event of a complete elimination of demand for that particular knowledge — such as through technological changes.
Training is an invaluable tool for increasing the productivity of an organization. It not only enhances the resourcefulness of employees but also allows them the opportunity to learn their jobs more thoroughly and conduct them with greater competence. This improves the productivity of not just employees, but of the organization as a whole. Several studies reveal the positive impact of training on employee productivity. As a process, training is one of the most comprehensive techniques for enhancing employee productivity and communicating the goals of the organization to the workforce (Abdul & Aamer, 2011). This view is also supported by research suggesting that investment in employee training concerning decision making, problem-solving, interpersonal relations, and teamwork has a positive influence on organizational growth in addition to improving employee performance (Rohan & Madhumita, 2012). Training positively affects the behavior and working skills of employees, thereby resulting in improved performance as well as constructive change (Davis & Daley, 2008).
Training is the most effective tool for motivation and retention of high-quality human resources in an organization (Tippelt & Amoros, 2003; Owens, 2006; Sahinidis & Bouris, 2008). Furthermore, training enhances employee commitment towards the organization and maximizes their potential (Groen, 2006). It is a fundamental instrument that influences the successful achievement of organizational objectives and goals (Nishitha & Amit, 2010). The prime goal of any organization, however, is the generation of high revenue and profit maximization, and the most significant instrument for realizing this objective is an effective and efficient workforce. Therefore, David, being a star performer and thus a human resource asset to his organization, needs to be both effective and efficient. This is only possible if he is provided with appropriate development and training — in his case, focusing on the development of interpersonal skills in order to increase productivity. The interpersonal skills David needs to improve include both verbal and non-verbal communication, questioning, listening, social awareness, self-regulation and management, accountability and responsibility, and learning to be assertive rather than argumentative.
Before determining the type of training best suited for David, it is useful to classify the types of training available. Abdul and Aamer (2011) establish that two major kinds of training techniques are prevalent in organizations: on-the-job training and off-the-job training. On-the-job training is generally handled by the employee's colleagues, mentors, supervisors, and managers. It facilitates employees in adjusting to their jobs and equips them with the relevant skills required for their particular role. It is argued that such training can involve coaching or teaching employees by more experienced individuals at the office desk or workstation (Kaufman & Hotchkiss, 2006). It can also comprise group or individual assignments and projects guided by managers and team leaders.
As Armstrong notes, on-the-job coaching is the primary method for the development and practice of specific managerial, technical, manual, selling, administrative, and team-leading skills required by organizations. It carries the benefits of immediacy and relevance, as individuals work, learn, and develop expertise simultaneously. This method can therefore prove to be an effective coaching technique for honing David's social skills in the workplace. However, Armstrong also cautions that this training method poses disadvantages: the quality of guidance and training provided strongly affects learning effectiveness (Abdul & Aamer, 2011). Many team leaders or managers may be unskilled at imparting training or disinclined to encourage and coach employees. Furthermore, reliance upon coworkers — as in the "sit-by-me" method of training — poses obvious disadvantages: instructions may be incomplete, written guidelines may be absent, and bad habits may be developed or perpetuated. The employee being trained may also be distracted by the environment and may find it difficult to develop the basic required skills quickly.
Therefore, on-the-job trainers in this case should use the environment to their advantage by allowing David and his coworkers to interact with one another and apply newly learned skills in real time. In order for David and his colleagues to develop a higher-level interpersonal skill set, they need to engage actively with that knowledge. They need to train their minds and become comfortable with questioning, listening, and social awareness. The best way to accomplish this is to apply these skills in real time as soon as they are learned. The workplace therefore becomes an ideal location for David to hone his skills.
"Reciprocity and spontaneous cooperation through training"
"Social identity, employee commitment, and retention strategies"
"Methods for measuring training program effectiveness"
Training of employees is an effective tool that assists organizations in developing a more productive and committed workforce. An effective training program establishes employee investment, identification, and reciprocity, and limits alternative employment possibilities, thereby resulting in increased commitment and reduced employee turnover. The organization consequently becomes more professional and productive. Though training plays a vital role in achieving this, companies should also consider other strategies and methods to enhance commitment among personnel. Training by itself may be highly useful, but a larger impact can be achieved through an HR strategy that involves several different policies and practices aimed at organizational commitment. Companies should methodically and strategically develop HR practices that successfully achieve comprehensive commitment. An efficient training program, as defined by the principles discussed in this paper, is an organizational practice that will bring about enhanced employee commitment, resulting in a more stable workforce.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.