Essay Undergraduate 2,130 words

Managing Diversity: Hiring U.S. Military Veterans Effectively

~11 min read
Abstract

This paper examines how U.S. companies can effectively manage and support military veterans re-entering the civilian workforce. It begins by comparing the skill sets of veterans and non-veterans, highlighting the unique challenges veterans face when transitioning out of military service. The paper then explores the strategic management challenges employers encounter when hiring veterans, the competitive advantage companies can gain through veteran-focused corporate social responsibility, and best practices drawn from programs such as the Transition Assistance Program (TAP) and the Wounded Warrior Project. A brief case analysis of Lockheed Martin illustrates the practical and financial benefits of veteran hiring, and the paper concludes with actionable recommendations for businesses seeking to integrate veterans into their workforce.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand
â–Ľ

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper follows a clear, logical progression — moving from problem identification (skill gaps) through strategy, competitive advantage, best practices, and concrete recommendations — making it easy to follow and academically coherent.
  • It grounds abstract concepts like corporate social responsibility and strategic management in concrete, real-world examples (Tesla, Lockheed Martin), which strengthens the argument and improves readability.
  • Direct quotations from peer-reviewed sources are integrated smoothly and attributed correctly, demonstrating proper academic citation practice throughout.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective use of the compare-and-contrast method as an analytical foundation. By systematically contrasting veteran and non-veteran skill development early on, it establishes the core problem that the rest of the paper works to solve. This framing technique anchors subsequent sections — strategy, best practices, and recommendations — in a clearly defined challenge, giving the argument a cohesive through-line.

Structure breakdown

The paper is organized into seven sections. The introduction defines the problem and previews the paper's scope. The second section compares veteran and non-veteran skill sets. The third addresses strategic management challenges for employers. The fourth explores competitive advantage via corporate social responsibility. The fifth outlines best practices and external support programs. The sixth provides a case analysis of Lockheed Martin. The final section synthesizes recommendations and offers a brief conclusion, tying the argument back to the paper's opening claims.

Introduction

As Hazle, Wilcox, and Hassan (2012) point out, U.S. military veterans re-entering civilian life often face numerous challenges that can be difficult to overcome. In many cases, a total mental and social adjustment is required, a support system is needed, and guidance or direction must be provided to help prepare veterans for life outside the military. The order and functioning system they are accustomed to in the military is not present in civilian life, and the hierarchical chain of command in which they have worked is typically not enforced with such rigor in whatever workplace they end up joining in civilian life.

U.S. companies also face the challenge of addressing the needs of this population. It is a significantly large talent pool with valuable skills and knowledge — but tapping into that pool can be difficult for businesses as well, because of the readjustment process that veterans must go through, which can often be discouraging and upsetting for all stakeholders. Wenger and Snyder (2000) have argued that bringing veterans back into the fold of civilian life, including helping them obtain work, is a community challenge that requires assistance from everyone regardless of their position in life. U.S. companies, however, can play a particularly strong role in helping veterans develop their skills so that they are better oriented toward civilian-style work and achieve meaningful employment.

U.S. Military Veterans vs. Non-Veterans: Comparing Skill Sets

This paper discusses precisely what companies can do to help veterans develop their skills and become employed. First, it compares the typical skill sets of veterans and non-veterans to show how they differ. Second, it examines the strategic management process and the challenges that employers face with respect to a veteran workforce. It then assesses the competitive advantage that businesses can gain by working with veterans, describes best practices, provides a brief case analysis, and finally offers recommendations that U.S. companies can use to address this issue.

Many U.S. veterans entered military service directly out of high school. They never held a job in civilian life and never acquired the skills needed to look for work, interview, or build a resume. The work-related skills they acquire in the military may be narrowly defined by the occupation they hold while in service — for instance, working on military helicopters, serving a general, or passing orders down the chain of command. Non-veterans, on the other hand, typically attend college after high school and obtain training and education in the area they wish to pursue in the civilian workforce. They can train to become engineers, teachers, business managers, doctors, nurses, and much more.

While veterans are defending the country, non-veterans are spending those same years learning the skills needed to obtain a job in the field of their choosing. U.S. military veterans returning home and re-entering civilian life are at a significant disadvantage because they have not always had the opportunity to complete their education; they may not have acquired the college-level business skills and knowledge needed to serve as an effective civilian manager. They may have managed groups and departments in the military, but military experience differs from civilian workplace experience in fundamental ways. For instance, in the military, if an employee fails to perform his or her duty, they can very likely face serious disciplinary consequences, including confinement. That is a powerful incentive to keep workers in line. In civilian life, such consequences simply do not apply — which means managers and leaders must be more creative in how they incentivize and motivate their employees (Gerhart & Fang, 2015).

Strategic Management and the Challenges of a Veteran Workforce

The strategic management process involves defining goals, identifying areas for growth as well as problem areas that need to be addressed, formulating strategies for achieving those goals, growing the company in as many beneficial ways as possible, developing and implementing a strategy, and evaluating and controlling outcomes (Daspit, Chrisman, Sharma, Pearson, & Long, 2017). Successful U.S. companies employ the strategic management process year-round, constantly assessing where they are, where they want to be, and how they can get there. When it comes to employing the veteran workforce, there are a few challenges that businesses must address in order to successfully implement their strategic management process.

The biggest challenge is simply helping the veteran adapt to the civilian world of business. This includes assisting the veteran with social and professional acclimation. One way businesses can facilitate this transition is to engage in an extended onboarding process with veterans. Onboarding is a strategic tool that businesses can use when training new hires. Typically, a new hire will be brought into a company, given a few days or weeks of training, and then left to perform their job independently. The onboarding process is more extensive: it provides the new hire with a mentor who can offer support at any time, answer questions, serve as a guide, and help the new hire feel more comfortable in the workplace (Hamburg & Harris-Thompson, 2017).

4 Locked Sections · 785 words remaining
Sign up to read these 4 sections

Competitive Advantage Through Veteran Hiring · 185 words

"CSR and brand benefits of employing veterans"

Best Practices for Supporting Veteran Employees · 220 words

"TAP, onboarding, and standardized job descriptions"

Case Analysis: Lockheed Martin and the Returning Heroes Tax Credit · 195 words

"Lockheed Martin as a model veteran employer"

Recommendations and Conclusion · 185 words

"Actionable steps and closing argument for companies"

You’re 38% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Veteran Employment Skill Translation Onboarding Process Transition Assistance Program Corporate Social Responsibility Competitive Advantage Returning Heroes Tax Credit Workforce Diversity PTSD Misconceptions Community of Practice
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Managing Diversity: Hiring U.S. Military Veterans Effectively. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/managing-diversity-hiring-military-veterans-2172366

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.