This paper examines the growing impact of cultural diversity on organizations operating in a globalized world. It traces how globalization drives workforce diversity and the challenges and opportunities this creates for multinational enterprises. Drawing on frameworks including Hofstede's cultural dimensions, Porter's competitive advantage theory, and Kogut and Singh's cultural distance index, the paper discusses how diverse workplaces stimulate innovation and knowledge generation, how managers can effectively lead multicultural teams, and how organizations can translate cultural diversity into measurable profit gains. The paper also highlights areas requiring further research, including improved measurement of cultural distance and country-level studies of diversity attitudes.
Today, globalization is a widespread phenomenon that is making boundaries between countries fade away. It has a great impact on organizations and consumers because it provides the means for all countries to work within one large network instead of separate smaller ones. In this large network, competition becomes tighter, technology diffusion becomes faster, learning curves grow shorter, manufacturing costs trend downward, consumer demands expand, and workforce mobility increases. On the social side, multinational enterprises (MNEs) face numerous challenges due to globalization, because they are forced to learn how to deal with cultural diversity. Global organizations must reach a point at which understanding and respecting different cultures, mentalities, values, and norms is a prerequisite for survival.
Cultural diversity has a strong impact on organizational communication processes. The fact that individuals communicating with each other come from different places implies that they perceive facts and words differently, regardless of whether the communication flows between different hierarchical levels or similar ones.
On the positive side, diversity-oriented working environments have been shown to stimulate innovation and effective learning. Innovation and learning translate into a knowledge advantage, and the organization's profits increase proportionally.
To take even greater advantage of workplace diversity, some organizations design their marketing strategies for specific ethnic groups, drawing on the fact that specific ethnic knowledge is embedded in their people. In some instances these strategies target fast-growing minorities, which attract increasing interest as their average incomes rise and they represent higher sales potential for those organizations.
This paper discusses the increasing impact of cultural diversity on the internal activity of organizations and the corresponding change in organizational attitude toward the customer and the market.
The phenomenon of globalization has been defined in several ways, covering a wide range of domains from cultural differences between nations to foreign exchange risk:
Definition 1: "It describes the process by which events, decisions, and activities in one part of the world can come to have significant consequences for individuals and communities in quite distant parts of the globe" (McGrew, 1992, p. 23).
Definition 2: "Globalization is defined here as a set of economic and political structures and processes deriving from the changing character of the goods and assets that comprise the base of the international political economy — in particular, the increasing structural differentiation of those goods and assets" (Lawrence, 1996, p. 8).
Definition 3: "Globalization is first of all a political and only in the second place a business location strategy: a company following a strategy of globalization will localize activities abroad (1) only if the company otherwise risks being treated as an 'outsider' or being hit by trade or investment barriers thus losing market share, and (2) to the extent that the company can exert more control over its host governments than vice versa" (Ruigrok & van Tulder, 1995, p. 179).
Definition 4: "Globalization refers to a world in which, after allowing for exchange rate and default risk, there is a single international rate of interest" (Brittan, 1996).
Definition 5: "Globalization is, in essence, a process that creates opportunities for faster growth and more rapid poverty reduction in those poor countries in which the domestic economic and political environment is conducive" (Srinivasan, 2002, p. 3).
The editors of Strategic Communication Management magazine (2001) discussed how three successful multinationals — Reebok, Barclay Global Investors (BGI), and Ericsson — managed to rise to the challenge brought by globalization. Reebok made all strategic decisions around the communication process. The sportswear marketer focused on designing a global communication strategy and a consistent global brand that reflected local cultures, combined global and local priorities, and recognized human rights as part of its social responsibility actions. A key success factor in BGI's globalization effort was a strong and consistent communication strategy. The organization's managers understood that their employees needed to connect with each other worldwide, and in order to smooth internal communication, the organization made intensive use of technology. Ericsson, one of the largest players in telecommunications, also used communication as a key factor in managing its globalization challenges. The organization's managers believed it was essential to have a globally integrated communication process in order to generate as much value as possible for their stakeholders. The study notes that relations between media and investors are increasingly close, so organizations must be careful to send consistent messages across different countries.
The same editors of Strategic Communication Management identified five interconnected cultural dimensions that heavily influence multinationals in their internationalization process. Those dimensions are:
Corporate level — all cultures within the organization; National level — all internal and external cultures, including the external environment in which the organization operates; Industrial — the culture of the industry in which the organization is active; Functional — the culture of professional and vocational groups within the organization; Ethnic — ethnic cultures in the organization's external environment.
A case study by Strategic Communication Management (2000) on Royal Energy Corp pointed out how important it is to have a positive attitude toward change when defining a global corporate strategy. The authors noted that although diversity is a great challenge for all multinationals, it is also a valuable asset, serving as a live source of new ideas and methods suited to local cultures.
There is good reason why globalization is one of the most popular phenomena among economic researchers today. As better technologies are discovered every day, the phenomenon becomes more present throughout the world. Economically and socially, this fact impacts organizations heavily. Both external and internal environments grow more complex. The external environment expands and competition intensifies as more organizations gain access to the same markets and consumers. The internal environment increases in complexity because people and processes must shift from national to international levels, spanning different cultures and mentalities, making organizational communication an important tool for a successful corporate strategy.
Globalization has a considerable impact on diverse workplaces, the relationship being one of mutual cause and effect. Multinational companies must learn how to manage workplaces with increasing diversity, especially as many authors suggest that globalization is a process that slowly homogenizes cultures and mentalities — which also implies that it is slowly reducing diversity. However, the current situation has not yet reached that level. Diversity is increasing as companies become more "global." Perhaps there is a learning curve associated with globalization: in the beginning, diversity increases as organizations learn how to become globally efficient, and decreases later on as they learn to deal with it more effectively.
Among organizational drivers of innovation, employees are the most important. First, they play an active role in the learning process, bringing with them distinctive sets of knowledge. Second, once they learn organizational processes, they generate innovations. An organization that employs individuals with diversified mental models, experiences, and cultures has better chances of producing more innovative products than one that employs limited diversity. The key factors enabling an organization to successfully exploit its employees' capacity to innovate include:
Having a culture of social inclusion. A few years ago, workplace diversity was primarily about anti-discrimination compliance. Today, the focus has shifted to more complex issues, such as social inclusion and its impact on organizations (Lockwood, 2005). At the operational level, the one-size-fits-all approach to people and processes has evolved into a more flexible and adaptive one as marketplaces have permanently changed and organizations have needed to generate competitive advantage in order to survive.
Valuing difference. As diversity increases with the spread of globalization, it is essential not to let differences between individuals sharing the same workplace create mental and behavioral gaps. To prevent that, organizations should promote interaction among employees in order to stimulate innovation and create competitive advantage.
Letting employees know that their knowledge and learning are respected. Individuals need to be assured that their efforts are not meaningless. If this assurance is absent, they lose the incentive to learn new things and further improve their knowledge.
According to O'Flynn et al. (2001), diversity has three major components: primary personal characteristics, secondary personal characteristics, and organizational-related characteristics. Primary personal characteristics include innate characteristics such as gender, race, and nationality. Secondary personal characteristics include acquired personal characteristics such as educational background, marital status, and life experience. Organizational-related characteristics include characteristics acquired within the organization, such as tenure and hierarchical position.
Learning is the factor that provides value to diversity. As different mindsets, knowledge sets, and experiences are challenged and combined, the chances of generating effective learning increase. Workplaces with greater diversity are therefore likely to be more efficient when solving complex problems than homogeneous workplaces, because the range of potential solutions is wider and more varied.
Knowledge is crucial for business success. There are two types: explicit and tacit. Explicit knowledge is easily codified, stored, and transmitted to other individuals. Tacit knowledge, by contrast, is embedded in people. The size of an organization's tacit knowledge pool is proportional to the diversity of its workforce. Organizations therefore face the increasing challenge of finding ways to tap into that pool of tacit knowledge in order to create competitive advantage — because tacit knowledge is the type to which competitors do not have access, as it resides in the unique individuals belonging to a given organization.
Knowledge can be enhanced by the learning process, and its final objective is to be materialized into products and services — in other words, innovation. Innovations are among the most important tools an organization has for generating competitive advantage. In diverse workplaces, the probability of generating innovations is higher than in less diverse ones, because more knowledge sets interact with each other, increasing the probability of reaching a superior outcome. This relationship can be expressed simply as: Learning → Knowledge → Innovation.
According to Porter's (1998) theory of the competitive advantage of nations, a nation's advantage is highly dependent on the competitiveness of a cluster made up of firms, suppliers, related industries, and institutions. A cluster is defined as a network of players that interact to reach common goals. Strong clusters embed strong knowledge and foster innovation. Adapting this logic to organizations, increased organizational diversity will increase the cluster's diversity, and because increased organizational diversity translates into greater competitive advantage, increased cluster diversity can translate into advantage at the same scale.
"Eight managerial guidelines for diverse team leadership"
"Research gaps and Hofstede's cultural dimension framework"
"Diversity as a direct driver of organizational profitability"
Cultural diversity is a reality in the global world today. Customers, employees, employers, stakeholders, shareholders, and organizations all must deal with this issue in their everyday lives. Customers want products tailored to their unique needs; employees want to work in diverse environments where they can improve their knowledge; employers want their employees to keep learning and generate competitive advantages; stakeholders and shareholders want higher profits and greater welfare; and organizations need to create the right environment for all of these goals to be realized. Dealing with cultural diversity in the workplace is the ultimate challenge in a globalized world.
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.