Managing Trail Conflicts in Parks and Recreation Planning
This paper examines the management of potential trail conflicts in park and recreation planning, drawing primarily on the Department of Conservation and Recreation's Trail Guidelines and Best Practices Manual (2012). It covers trail classification systems, types of designed trail use, the importance of trails for ecological sustainability and multiple-use recreation, and key conflict management principles. The paper then applies these frameworks to a practical management project involving three trails within the Raleigh, North Carolina Capital Area Greenway system, identifying appropriate staffing strategies based on group characteristics such as the presence of children, grilling activities, and varied recreational uses.
- Introduction and Study Objectives: Study purpose and park staff identification
- Trail Classification and Design: Five trail classes and designed use types
- Importance of Trails and Trail Management: Ecological value, sustainability, and planning
- Trail Crews, Signage, and Conflict Management: Staffing, signage types, and twelve conflict principles
- Greenway Belt Case Study: Raleigh, North Carolina: Three Raleigh trails and staff assignments
- Summary and Conclusion: Key trail management considerations summarized
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It moves logically from broad conceptual frameworks (trail classifications, conflict principles) to a specific applied case study, demonstrating how theory informs practice.
- It systematically enumerates management considerations — trail classes, use types, conflict factors, and staffing requirements — providing a structured reference useful for park planners.
- The case study section grounds abstract principles in a real-world setting, identifying specific trails, group characteristics, and tailored staff assignments to address safety concerns.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied policy analysis: it extracts principles and classifications from an authoritative government manual and applies them directly to a management scenario. This technique — moving from codified guidelines to operational decisions — is characteristic of professional and public administration writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with study objectives, then builds a conceptual foundation through trail classification, trail importance, signage, and conflict management principles (all drawn from a single authoritative source). The second half pivots to a case study of three Raleigh, NC greenway trails, using group characteristics tables to determine appropriate staff assignments. A brief conclusion synthesizes the key management considerations identified throughout.
Introduction and Study Objectives
The objective of this study is to examine the management of potential trail conflicts in park and recreation planning. Appropriate park staff will be identified for managing groups utilizing trails, with the expectation that the information will provide guidance for future park management.
Trail Classification and Design
Various trail classes are identified in the Department of Conservation and Recreation's Trail Guidelines and Best Practices Manual (2012), including the following classes:
(1) Class 1 Trails: Minimal and underdeveloped trails; (2) Class 2 Trails: Simple and minor development trails; (3) Class 3 Trails: Developed and improved trails; (4) Class 4 Trails: Highly developed trails; and (5) Class 5 Trails: Fully developed trails.
These categories are used to identify applicable trail design, trail management, and standards for maintenance and managed uses. Designed use refers to the intended use of the trail, which guides the trail's design.
Types of designed-use trails include the following: (1) walking; (2) hiking; (3) mountain biking; (4) equestrian; (5) off-road vehicles; and (6) other uses not directly relevant to this study.
References
Capital Area Greenway System (2014). City of Raleigh, North Carolina. Retrieved from: http://www.raleighnc.gov/parks/content/PRecDesignDevelop/Articles/CapitalAreaGreenwayTrailSystem.html
Chavez, D.J., et al. (1993). Recreational mountain biking: A management perspective. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 11(3).
Conflicts on multiple-use trails: Synthesis of the literature and state of the practice (n.d.). Federal Highway Administration and the National Recreational Trails Advisory Committee. Retrieved from: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/recreational_trails/publications/conflicts_on_multiple_use_trails/conflicts.pdf
Conflicts on multiple-use trails: Synthesis of the literature and state of the practice (2014). Trail maintenance and management. National Trails Training Partnership. Retrieved from:
Jellum, C.M. (2007). Managing mountain bike recreation and user conflicts: A study on Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest, Washington State. Retrieved from:
State park trail conflicts and resolution strategies (n.d.). Retrieved from:
Trail use conflict study (n.d.). California Parks Government. Retrieved from:
Trails guidelines and best practices manual (2012). Department of Conservation and Recreation. Retrieved from:
Trails program management: Operations and management (n.d.). County Trails Program. Community Trails Master Plan, Section 8. Retrieved from: http://www.co.san-diego.ca.us/reusable_components/images/parks/doc/CTMP/01_CTMP_pdf/08_Program_Management.pdf
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.