This paper examines the management of the Allegheny National Forest, a federally protected area spanning much of Pennsylvania on the Allegheny Plateau. It surveys the Forest Service's ownership philosophy, which centers on balancing competing stakeholder interests — including timber companies, oil and gas industries, recreational users, and environmental groups — while maintaining long-term sustainability. The paper identifies primary management issues such as industrial drilling disputes, inadequate funding and oversight, and access conflicts among visitor groups. It also outlines the principal natural resources extracted from the forest, including timber, oil, and natural gas, and concludes by reflecting on the growing challenges of managing protected lands as resource demands increase.
The Allegheny Plateau, which stretches from western New York through much of Pennsylvania and parts of Ohio, and extends as far south as Kentucky, was the focus of the Forest Service and the Organic Act of 1897, which put forth the National Forest mission of the preservation and protection of the nation's forests, forested lands, and waterways (FS 2011). The Allegheny National Forest is a federally protected and managed area on this plateau located primarily within Pennsylvania, and ongoing environmental, social, and economic issues have made the management of this particular National Forest particularly controversial and complex in some regards (FS 2011; Hopey 2006; Senecah et al. 2003). Though this complexity makes the task more burdensome for the Forest Service, the issues surrounding the management of the Allegheny National Forest make it an excellent case study for land management.
Like most National Forests managed by the Forest Service, the Allegheny National Forest faces diverse needs and uses for its land and resources that must be effectively and fairly managed. Visitors to the forest appreciate its natural beauty and the diversity of wildlife that resides there, environmental groups point to both intrinsic and extrinsic values inherent to the forest itself, and several industries depend on various resources within the forest's boundaries (FS 2011). All of these needs must be supported by sound management philosophies and actions.
The stated mission of the National Forest Service is "to improve the forest, provide favorable conditions for water flows, and furnish a continuous supply of wood to meet people's needs" (FS 2011). This reflects the central need to balance the concerns of all stakeholders in the Allegheny National Forest, even when those needs may seem at odds with one another. Allowing for the continued economic viability and relevance of the forest is one of the central means of protecting it environmentally and aesthetically, while ensuring the environmental stability of the forest is essential to guaranteeing that ongoing timber supplies and other resources remain accessible (FS 2011; Senecah et al. 2003). In essence, the overall management and ownership philosophy of the Forest Service with regard to the Allegheny is to ensure the sustainability of all current uses of the forest (FS 2011).
Despite this commitment to overall sustainability, certain issues with the management of the Allegheny National Forest have made conflict unavoidable. The various planners and managers directly responsible for managing access to the forest and the use of its resources have been the target of numerous criticisms and face pressure from a variety of groups (Hopey 2006). The Forest Service as a whole has also been subject to similar criticism, and the ability to effectively and proactively address these pressures without losing sight of the balance required for overall sustainability is key to successful land management (Senecah et al. 2003).
Specific issues that have arisen in the management of the Allegheny National Forest include disputes regarding threats posed by oil and natural gas drilling, the need to balance timber sales with wildlife and ecosystem preservation, regulating and collecting revenue from timber, oil, and gas companies under limited oversight, and a variety of other economic and environmental concerns (Hopey 2006). One of the most complex and pressing daily management challenges for the Forest Service in the Allegheny National Forest is visitor access. The park is open to cars in certain areas and also has trails open to horseback riders, hikers, snowmobiles, and other modes of transportation. Proponents of each type of conveyance have at various points felt underserved, taken advantage of, or scapegoated during the forest's development and management (Senecah et al. 2003; Hopey 2006).
"Funding gaps, data accuracy, and industrial oversight"
"Timber, oil, gas, and recreation as resources"
The Allegheny National Forest provides a wonderful recreation area to many thousands of visitors every year, and is also a source of several key natural resources. Managing the various uses and products that this forest provides is no easy task, and it is one that the Forest Service has met with varying degrees of success over more than a century of its existence. As resource needs continue to grow and preserved natural areas become harder to come by, it will be interesting to see how the managers of this land respond.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.