This paper examines coal mining on the Denniston Plateau in New Zealand's West Coast region, focusing on the controversial Escarpment Mine Project operated by Bathurst Resources. It outlines the settlement's history, the environmental opposition led by groups such as Forest and Bird, and the relevant national legislation — including the Resource Management Act 1991 — governing resource use. The paper also reviews scientific evidence on the health hazards of coal dust exposure, discusses gaps in the epidemiological literature, and concludes with recommendations for additional data gathering and alternative economic development strategies such as tourism.
The paper demonstrates evidence synthesis across disciplines: it draws on legal texts (Resource Management Act), government planning documents (Statement of Intent), and environmental health literature to construct a coherent argument. Rather than relying on a single type of source, it triangulates claims across policy, science, and current events — a technique common in applied environmental studies and public health writing.
The paper opens with geographic and historical context before moving into the legal dispute surrounding Bathurst Resources. It then surveys the national and international legislative framework, evaluates government policy intent, and reviews scientific evidence on health hazards. A final section identifies research gaps and proposes practical recommendations. This funnel structure — from specific case to broad policy to targeted solutions — is well-suited to environmental policy writing at the undergraduate level.
On the northwestern side of New Zealand's South Island lies a small settlement known as Denniston. This area forms part of the country's West Coast region. The town sits on the small Mount Rochfort Plateau in the Papahaua mountain ranges, approximately 600 meters above sea level and 18 kilometers northeast of Westport.
At the start of the 20th century, the population of this small settlement was recorded at approximately 2,000, owing to a large coal mine situated close to the residential area. Today, the town has become something of a ghost town, with barely 50 people remaining. The fate, location, and history of Denniston are not unlike those of another New Zealand settlement known as Millerton.
It is important to note that coal is still being mined at the Stockton Mine and near Burnett's Face. In 2010, Bathurst Resources announced that the Escarpment Mine Project would begin extracting coal in this region — a decision that has since attracted considerable controversy and strong opposition from environmentalists.
In 2013, the Environment Court granted Bathurst Resources approval to commence coal mining in the region; however, environmental groups including Forest and Bird have continued to protest against the project.
There are two main reasons why environmental groups oppose coal mining in this region. The first concerns the community itself. Because Denniston is a small settlement, its population never substantially exceeded 2,000 people. Extensive coal mining programs have since reduced that number to fewer than 50 residents, effectively turning the town into a ghost town. Environmental groups argue that forcing people to abandon their homes in order to accommodate mining projects is fundamentally unjust.
The second reason relates to the landscape. The plateau features a rocky terrain that affords spectacular views of the ocean and coastal plains. Although often partially obscured by mist, the scenery is breathtaking and could be developed to attract tourists. The presence of active mining projects, however, makes this kind of alternative development impossible.
Several court cases have been heard on this matter. As of June 2014, Bathurst Resources was granted permission to proceed with its mining project on the Denniston Plateau. A six-month consent was issued by the Department of Conservation allowing the company to commence work on the West Coast, though the company is required to submit a new application each year in order to continue. The department also agreed to extend a $22 million compensation arrangement for Bathurst Resources from five years to seven years, in response to changes in the international coal market (ONE News, 2014).
It was stated that the funds would be directed toward predator and pest control in the Denniston Plateau and Kahurangi National Park. Forest and Bird, however, argued that the company should remain bound by the conditions of the original consent. The group contends that the company's declining share price signals that the project poses a real risk of causing irreparable environmental damage to the region (ONE News, 2014).
Bathurst Resources commenced its mining project in July 2014. The company does plan to reduce both the area mined and the volume of coal extracted over the following two years, with intentions to scale up operations when market conditions become more favorable (ONE News, 2014).
Since 1991, New Zealand's environmental laws have been organized around a set of consistent themes. The most prominent of these is the principle of sustainability, which now forms the foundational principle for managing physical and natural resources, fisheries, and indigenous forests (Mfe.govt.nz, 2014).
The cornerstone of New Zealand's environmental legislation is the Resource Management Act 1991. This Act governs how the country manages its environment, covering water, air, soil, the coastal environment, biodiversity, noise, general land use planning, and subdivision (Mfe.govt.nz, 2014).
With regard to international law, New Zealand is bound by numerous multilateral environmental agreements, many of which have been incorporated into national legislation. Such agreements are reached when multiple countries collaborate on global environmental issues. It should be noted that these agreements may include non-legally binding commitments — which parties are nonetheless expected to respect — as well as clauses that are legally binding on the parties involved.
Considering this legislative framework, the mining project assigned to Bathurst Resources is likely to affect biodiversity and general land use planning. As already noted, most of the plateau's former inhabitants have relocated due to extensive mining activity. The landscape of the region has also been degraded by coal extraction. Furthermore, mist generated by mining activity has contributed to air pollution in an already small community. It therefore appears that the government has not fully acted in accordance with the environmental legislation it has enacted.
Barnden, A., & Harding, J. (2005). Shredders and leaf breakdown in streams polluted by coal mining in the South Island, New Zealand. University of Canterbury, School of Biological Sciences.
Cashdollar, K., & Sapko, M. (2006). Explosion hazards of coal dust in the presence of methane. Handbook for Methane Control in Mining, 147.
Greenpeace International. (2010). [Report on coal dust and community health impacts].
Mfe.govt.nz. (2014). Laws and treaties. Ministry for the Environment. Retrieved 21 August 2014, from
Ministry for the Environment. (2014). Statement of Intent. Wellington.
ONE News. (2014). Bathurst to begin mining on Denniston Plateau. Retrieved from
Westport News. (2011). West Coast mayors tell Aucklanders to back off. New Zealand Herald.
YANG, M., CHEN, J., Ming, L., LI, X., & WEN, W. (2011). Noise and dust hazards in the workplace generating power with coal gangue and anthracite. Occupation and Health, 2, 015.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.