This paper presents a divisional cost of capital analysis for Marriott Corporation, examining how to calculate appropriate hurdle rates for three distinct business segments: lodging, restaurant, and contract services. The analysis uses Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) as the primary valuation tool, determining divisional hurdle rates by calculating the cost of debt, cost of equity, and capital structure for each division. The paper outlines a systematic methodology that begins with corporate-level WACC calculation, proceeds through divisional cost-of-equity estimation using beta and risk premium analysis, and concludes with divisional-specific capital costs. These divisional hurdle rates serve as critical benchmarks for evaluating investment projects, ensuring that only projects exceeding the division-specific cost of capital are accepted, thereby supporting Marriott's strategic objective of sustainable growth and market leadership across all operating segments.
As vice president of project finance for Marriott Corporation, I am conducting a comprehensive analysis of the company to calculate appropriate hurdle rates for each of our firm's three operating divisions: lodging, restaurant, and contract services. The primary valuation metric I employ is Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC), which serves as the hurdle rate for evaluating capital investment projects across the organization.
Investment projects at Marriott are selected by discounting appropriate cash flows using the corresponding hurdle rate for each division. This divisional approach recognizes that each business segment operates in different competitive environments with distinct risk profiles and capital structures. Therefore, applying a single corporate hurdle rate across all divisions would not accurately reflect the cost of capital specific to each business line and could lead to suboptimal investment decisions.
The objective of this analysis is to establish a rigorous methodology for calculating division-specific hurdle rates that will guide capital allocation decisions and support Marriott's strategic growth objectives across all operating segments.
The foundation of this analysis begins with determining the cost of capital at the corporate level. To calculate WACC for the entire Marriott Corporation, I must first determine three critical components: the cost of debt (Rd), the cost of equity (Re), and the company's overall capital structure (the proportion of debt and equity financing).
The cost of debt is derived from the weighted average interest rate paid on all outstanding debt obligations, adjusted for the tax deductibility of interest expenses. The tax rate applied to debt is a key adjustment, as interest payments are tax-deductible, creating what is known as the "tax shield." This tax shield reduces the effective after-tax cost of debt relative to the pre-tax cost.
The cost of equity represents the return that equity investors require for bearing the residual risk of the firm. Once the corporate-level cost of debt, cost of equity, and capital structure weights are determined, the WACC formula combines these components into a single weighted average discount rate. This corporate WACC serves as a starting point for estimating division-specific hurdle rates.
With the corporate WACC established, the next step is to calculate hurdle rates specific to each of the three divisions. For the lodging and restaurant divisions, which operate in markets with observable comparable companies, I determine the cost of equity by estimating the Risk-free Rate (Rf), Risk Premium (Rp), and Beta (β) for each division.
Beta measures the systematic risk of a division relative to the market. For divisions with industry comparables, beta can be estimated by analyzing the stock price volatility and leverage of peer companies in the lodging and restaurant sectors. Once beta is estimated, the cost of equity is calculated using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), which incorporates the risk-free rate and the market risk premium.
For the lodging and restaurant divisions, I also estimate the cost of debt and the fraction of debt in the capital structure for each division. These divisional-specific capital structure weights may differ from the corporate average due to differences in leverage policy and access to capital markets across divisions.
The contract services division presents a unique challenge, as it lacks readily available market comparables for direct beta estimation. To address this, I employ a weighted average method based on the identifiable assets of the company in 1987. This approach allocates the unidentified assets proportionally to the three divisions based on their relative asset bases, enabling estimation of beta and capital structure for the contract services division. Once beta and capital structure are determined for contract services, the divisional WACC can be calculated using the same methodology as the other divisions.
The divisional hurdle rates serve as the primary decision criterion for evaluating investment opportunities. Under this framework, an investment project is undertaken only if its internal rate of return (IRR) exceeds the hurdle rate applicable to the division proposing the investment.
This decision rule ensures that projects create economic value by earning a return that at least compensates investors for the capital's systematic risk. By using division-specific hurdle rates rather than a single corporate rate, Marriott avoids two critical errors: accepting low-risk projects that would be rejected if evaluated at a higher corporate WACC, and accepting high-risk projects that should be rejected when their true cost of capital is reflected in a division-specific hurdle rate.
The selection of projects based on the IRR exceeding the divisional WACC is consistent with modern capital budgeting theory and ensures alignment between investment decisions and shareholder value creation. Each division's project portfolio will reflect the appropriate risk-return profile for that line of business.
"Capital allocation and growth strategy"
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.