Mass Shootings in America: Causes, Statistics, and Prevention
This paper examines the growing epidemic of mass shootings in the United States, beginning with an analysis of how the term "mass shooting" is defined by federal agencies and researchers. Using the 2019 El Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio, shootings as primary case studies, the paper profiles the perpetrators, their motivations, and their mental health histories. It then presents statistical context for mass shooting frequency and casualty rates in 2019. The paper concludes by evaluating two primary prevention strategies — stricter gun control and improved mental health intervention — while arguing that neither is sufficient on its own and that a deeper cultural shift, beginning at the family level, is ultimately required.
- Introduction: Overview of rising U.S. mass shooting frequency
- What Is a Mass Shooting?: Federal and FBI definitions of mass shootings
- The El Paso and Dayton Shootings: Profiles of 2019 shooters, motives, and events
- Mass Shooting Statistics in 2019: 2019 casualty counts and frequency data
- Prevention Strategies: Gun control, mental health, and cultural solutions
- Conclusion: Culture and family as root of lasting solutions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses specific, named case studies — the El Paso and Dayton shootings — to ground abstract policy arguments in concrete, recent events, giving the paper immediacy and credibility.
- Acknowledges definitional complexity early on, noting that mass shooting statistics vary widely depending on the definition used, which demonstrates critical thinking about data sources.
- Evaluates both major proposed solutions (gun control and mental health intervention) with balanced skepticism, identifying weaknesses in each before proposing a broader cultural argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs a problem–solution structure layered over case study analysis. It introduces a social problem, contextualizes it with specific events and data, then critically evaluates proposed remedies before advancing its own thesis — that cultural change at the family level is the root solution. This move from description to critical evaluation to normative argument is a strong model for policy-oriented academic writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a definition section that establishes the scope of the problem. Two detailed case study sections follow, profiling the El Paso and Dayton shooters respectively. A statistics section provides quantitative context. The prevention section evaluates gun control and mental health approaches before pivoting to a cultural argument. A brief conclusion synthesizes the main claim. The structure is logical and progressive, moving from definition to evidence to analysis to recommendation.
Introduction
Mass shootings in America have become more prevalent than ever before. Depending on how one defines "mass shooting," the number of such incidents in America in a given year can range anywhere from half a dozen to more than 200. Even at the strictest definition, half a dozen is too many. In one recent week alone, two mass shootings occurred back-to-back on opposite sides of the country — one in El Paso, Texas, where 22 people died, and one in Dayton, Ohio, where 9 died. As the nation becomes, to a degree, desensitized to the violence year after year — whether it is the Parkland shooting, the Virginia Beach shooting, the Orlando shooting, or the Las Vegas shooting — one still wonders what can be done to address this issue. Some believe stricter gun laws are needed. Others believe it is fundamentally a mental health issue. This paper defines the term "mass shooting," describes two recent mass shootings in the U.S., examines the statistics, and identifies some possible ways to prevent such events in the future.
What Is a Mass Shooting?
While there is no universally accepted definition of "mass shooting," the term is widely acknowledged to include any shooting in which there are multiple victims of firearm-related violence. The U.S. Congressional Research Service has defined the term as including any public mass shooting in which the shooter targets four or more people at random and kills them (Bagalman, Caldwell, Finklea & McCallion, 2013). This definition aligns with the FBI's definition of mass murder (Morton, 2010). As Evon (2019) observes, "according to the FBI, the term 'mass murder' has been defined generally as a multiple homicide incident in which four or more victims are murdered, within one event, and in one or more locations in close geographical proximity." This definition is typically used when referencing mass shootings; however, it is by no means a universal standard, and most mass shootings that receive significant media attention involve at least several dead or wounded.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.