This case study analyzes a real estate development opportunity in Bardhaman, West Bengal, India, as considered by the developer Shrachi. The paper examines whether Shrachi should expand beyond its Kolkata base to develop a mixed-income township, and evaluates two potential financial partners: the West Bengal Housing Board (WBHB), a government entity focused on affordable housing, and Xander Funds, a private equity firm favoring upscale real estate. The analysis covers market demand projections, land assemblage challenges, financial metrics including NPV, IRR, and profitability index, and the compatibility of each partnership structure with the project's goals. The paper concludes that WBHB represents the more appropriate co-investor given the area's demographic realities and the developer's long-term interests.
The developer at Shrachi is considering the prospects of developing land near Bardhaman, West Bengal. Residential demand has been steadily increasing in India, with a trend toward urbanization reflected by a rising middle class settling in cities where employment and cultural opportunities are promising. The parcels of land under consideration could potentially be developed through a partnership with the West Bengal Housing Board (WBHB), a government entity whose goals include the development of low-income housing. Alternatively, the developer has entertained the idea of partnering with Xander Funds, a private equity group that invests in real estate and other asset classes.
The central question is whether Shrachi should leave its Kolkata base to develop in Bardhaman at all, and if so, in what form. The developer's vision for the land assemblage project — whereby small plots of land are aggregated and reorganized for real estate development — is a homogenized township, the units of which could command increasingly high prices as the development progressed.
A significant concern is that relations between farmers, industrialists, and politicians in the Bardhaman area were contentious in the recent past due to the unscrupulous seizure of private land by the government to encourage industrialization by a car manufacturer. Local residents and farmers still resent the Tata Motors factory dispute. The developer recognizes that working with either financial partner could impose constraints and conditions that he, as an independent developer, has not previously had to address. The prospect of future deals with either firm also weighs on his thinking.
As the developer considers the land development opportunity, one factor dominates: the Bardhaman development is far from Shrachi's Kolkata base and from the developer's network of business acquaintances, suppliers, and his home. The local Bardhaman residents and elected government contribute complexities that would not arise in developments closer to the home base. The primary issue is the degree to which a development can attract residents from the rural countryside and from more urban areas such as Kolkata, Katwa, and Kalna. The roads to the Bardhaman area are described as adequate to support a one-to-one-and-a-half-hour commute. While this may be acceptable by Western standards, it may not be practical for a worker in a nearby urban area to commute to a residence in Bardhaman on a daily basis.
Regardless of commute concerns, projections for population growth in urban areas of India are upwards of 400 million people. The pressure to expand outward from city centers is likely to be profound. In addition to this pressure, growing environmental concerns are likely to work against housing more people in already overrun cities. The anticipated demand for housing units was 7.5 million units per year by 2013, across all housing sectors. These figures indicate that housing demand and environmental constraints are conditioning rural and semi-rural areas, increasing the likelihood that development in these areas will be profitable in the near term.
The potential for a township in Bardhaman presents as very positive with regard to ultimate outcome, though the developer will need to proceed with great care, as the people of Bardhaman have been burned by their own government in the Tata Motors land incident. For this reason, land assemblage may turn out to be one of the more difficult steps in the development process.
In the developer's favor, another developer from Kolkata has already progressed through the assemblage, reorganization, and sale of raw plots of land in a parcel nearby the area under consideration. A key decision is whether any of the homes should be constructed as affordable housing, or whether the development should contain a mix of low, mid, and luxury housing. This decision is informed by the knowledge that approximately 85% of total residential demand falls in the affordable and mid-level segments. For this reason, these types of homes make up the lion's share of development activity in the area.
India is in a unique position in its own history. The term "growth" encompasses increases in the Indian economy, gross domestic product (GDP), and the real estate market — which has become India's second-largest employer. With a growth rate of 30% year-over-year, the Indian real estate market was expected to increase from its $14 billion valuation in 2008 to nearly $90 billion by 2015. There was considerable room to grow, as only about 20% of India's land had been developed at that time.
The developer faced a number of possible and promising configurations for funding, including the option of proceeding independently — either building the visionary township he envisioned or simply selling the reorganized lots to self-builders. He viewed the township build-out as a value-added contribution to India. The benefits of partnership in this venture would primarily be fiscal, although working with a government entity as a co-investor could smooth regulatory relationships, as well as provide an infusion of cash. Shrachi is likely to view the government of West Bengal as one of the more stable among possible co-investors, which could be important for the long term.
From Shrachi's perspective, the West Bengal Housing Board would be a sound co-investor, providing benefit during the crucial early stage of development and offering steady support going forward. Government-private relationships tend to endure, whether through institutional momentum or through a preference for working with established partners.
With regard to pricing and profit potential in the public-private partnership, the assumptions about square footage and pricing for group housing appear high. With bungalows running approximately Rs 900 per square foot to build with a footprint of about 1,500 square feet, group housing should be both smaller in size and lower in price. The modeling may not accurately reflect this differential. The WBHB asking price of Rs 290,000,000 seems fair and appears to appropriately gauge potential profit margins while keeping prices within a range that will produce good welfare outcomes.
"NPV, IRR, profitability index, and payback analysis"
"Xander's goals, FAR restrictions, and fit assessment"
The project would be a viable endeavor for Shrachi. It seems most probable that the developer will select the WBHB as a co-investor and development partner. With the heavy influence of the WBHB regarding requirements for affordable mass housing, Xander is likely to run counter to the WBHB's objectives. Xander is interested in investing in upscale real estate, and the developer is likely to recognize that this combination of competing interests will generate more friction than value.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.