This essay analyzes Matt Haig's short speculative fiction piece "The Invention of Peanut Butter" as a modern fable about the origins of capitalism and social inequality. Beginning with a primitive utopia of collective harmony, the story follows Sol, a boy whose invention of peanut butter disrupts communal equality and introduces class distinctions, political power, and militarism. The paper examines how Haig uses a deliberately mundane product to explore the broader consequences of innovation, private ownership, and material desire, arguing that individual ingenuity, while beneficial on the surface, ultimately fosters division, suspicion, and the erosion of democratic community.
As its title indicates, The Invention of Peanut Butter by British speculative fiction author Matt Haig is intended to be read as a fable, or myth of origins. Despite the fact that peanut butter may seem to be a very prosaic, modern food, the reader is immediately transported into a world that is a kind of primitive utopia. Villagers survive on pineapple and peanuts alone, and everyone lives in a state of collective harmony. To further establish a primitive and mythic tone, Haig elects not to name the inhabitants of the village, a choice that communicates their sense of solidarity with one another. The fact that people do not make food at all gives the environment a communal quality that is enviable and idyllic, even though the reader is presumably glad to have greater variety in his or her own diet.
The first character to be named in the story is a young boy named Solomon, who dislikes pineapples and eats only peanuts. His name — Sol — suggests both the sun and King Solomon, a king famously associated with wisdom and judgment. The fact that this character has a name, in stark contrast to everyone else, and also possesses a distinct dietary preference, signals to the reader that he is special. His presence disturbs the idyllic sameness of the original utopia.
Unlike the others, Sol wishes to change things, though his desire for change begins with himself alone. He creates peanut butter by crushing his beloved peanuts into a paste, mixed with oil, to produce a far more delicious, fatty, and unctuous substance. The myth-of-origins structure of the story is thus launched by a single individual's deviation from the collective norm.
At first, people are delighted. Sol's ingenuity brings variety to their diet. But he soon becomes paranoid that others will steal his secret recipe, and he begins to use his status to gain political power within the village. The village, which had previously been democratic, agrees to make Sol its head — lured by the promise of more peanut butter festivals. Because of his mastery of peanut-butter making and his ability to create a distinct product and distinguish himself from others, Sol accumulates greater power.
The metaphorical implications of this are sobering. Sol demonstrates a degree of initiative that other members of the community lack, and he does something genuinely special that should be commended. Yet as soon as someone does something special, they become covetous of it and begin to use their talent to separate themselves from others. The community benefits from a more varied diet and enjoys peanut butter, but must sacrifice something valuable and honorable about their society to Sol in the process.
"Innovation breeds competition, class distinctions, and mistrust"
"Private ownership necessitates guards and seeds of war"
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.