This paper reviews a case study concerning Valley Wide Utilities Company, a privately owned utility firm that adopted management by objectives (MBO) to improve its performance evaluation process for customer service representatives, engineering managers, and sales engineers. After three years, the initiative failed to achieve its intended outcomes, largely due to management complacency and unrealistic goals that did not account for seasonal operational demands — particularly overtime requirements during inclement weather. The paper identifies the root causes of the MBO initiative's shortcomings, outlines potential interventions including goal realignment and alternative performance review strategies, and frames key research questions to guide further case study analysis.
Developed by management expert Peter Drucker in the mid-20th century, management by objectives (MBO) has demonstrated efficacy in a wide range of organizational settings (Allvin and Aronsson 2011). The use of MBO in certain situations, however, is not always appropriate, and the effectiveness of the strategy as a management tool can be limited if certain factors are not taken into account — especially in sectors where people's welfare and even lives are at stake, such as utility companies.
One company that learned this lesson the hard way was Valley Wide Utilities, a privately owned utility company that implemented MBO in an effort to improve the evaluation process for customer service representatives, engineering department managers, and sales engineers. This paper provides a review of a case study concerning this company and relevant literature on MBO, including areas for a systematic literature review of the case study's issues, causes, and potential interventions. A discussion of the initial ideas that emerged from the case study is followed by a description of the scope and limitations of the research and a description of the task allocation for this case study.
The key issue that emerged from the Valley Wide Utilities Company case study was that the three-year-old MBO initiative was not achieving its intended outcomes — a failure attributable to insufficient consideration of the operational demands of a utility company, especially during periods of inclement weather.
The causes of this overarching issue were two-fold:
1. Management complacency concerning the problems being experienced with the MBO initiative; and
2. Widespread discontent among stakeholders due to unrealistic goals and the current application of the MBO initiative.
Potential interventions for these causes would include fine-tuning the objectives to make them more congruent with the company's mission and evaluating alternative performance review strategies that would be more suitable for Valley Wide's purposes.
"Stakeholder discontent and seasonal goal limitations"
"Guiding research questions for further analysis"
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.