This paper examines the continued relevance of the U.S. Army's Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) in wartime environments and argues for its transformation into a robust digital platform. Drawing on established doctrine and academic sources, the paper outlines the analytical foundation of the MDMP, traces early efforts to integrate digital technology into military planning, and proposes a business process reengineering approach for developing an electronic MDMP (e-MDMP). Key considerations include naturalistic decision making models, change management, hardware requirements, and information security. The paper concludes that commanders at all levels must prepare for a fundamental shift in decision-making posture as digital tools reshape battlefield planning.
The Army's Military Decision Making Process (MDMP) still represents the realities of command decision-making in battle and provides a practical guide to the efficient organization of large-unit staff planning activities. However, the MDMP should be translated into an effective and robust digital resource to keep pace with changing and emerging information and communications technologies. "The military decision making process (MDMP) is an established and proven analytical planning process. It applies across the spectrum of conflict and range of military operations." (ILE, The Military Decision-Making Process)
Since its inception, the Army has been fluid and adaptable in response to changing environments — whether social, political, cultural, or otherwise. The present MDMP doctrine is not a static and unchanging framework; it is more of a living document that evolves with the requirements of time and situation, born out of new experiences and knowledge. The critical question at this stage is how to fully translate the MDMP into a digital resource and leverage emerging information and communications technology to complement and improve decision-making in battle while providing a practical guide to the efficient organization of large-unit staff planning activities.
Efforts to modernize the MDMP date back further than many realize. As far back as 1997, there were plans to (Charlton, 1997):
Upgrade certain portions of the decision making process to make it more compatible with digital information systems and contemporary decision making theory. The upgraded MDMP focuses on the commander's intent and uses it as a controlling idea to guide the planning process. This controlling idea, along with a modified Commander's Critical Information Requirements (CCIR), clearly defines the commander's implicit and explicit information needs and sets the conditions for staff and subordinate initiative. The upgraded MDMP requires the commander to develop a course of action early in the planning process and use digital technology to collaborate with higher headquarters and subordinates. Finally, the upgraded MDMP relies on adaptive rather than predictive planning to deal with the complexity of the battlefield.
Adapting the "analog" MDMP to a "digital" format requires a deliberate business process reengineering effort. This process involves several distinct steps: determining the objective, mission, and vision of the transformation; requirements gathering and definition; design and validation of applicable systems; setup, installation, and configuration; functional review; controlled environment testing; pilot deployment; full deployment; and after-action reporting. This methodology will help ensure that whatever digital resource package is chosen or developed for the electronic MDMP — the e-MDMP — will suit and meet the needs of commanders from the strategic to the tactical level.
Timeliness, user-friendliness, and robustness are key features of the e-MDMP, given that it will be deployed not only in the controlled environment of the Pentagon but in diverse battlefield command and control environments, extending down to the individual soldier. The system should strive for real-time capability in order to accelerate decision-making at all levels.
"RPD model and commander intuition in digital planning"
"Hardware, security, and change management considerations"
One of the foremost considerations is the security architecture that must be incorporated into the system, particularly in terms of high-level cryptography and broader information security implementation. Any digital system handling sensitive operational planning data must be hardened against interception, tampering, and electronic warfare threats. The convergence of robust security, portability, and ease of use presents a significant engineering and acquisition challenge, but one that is essential to the operational viability of the e-MDMP.
With all the changes and discussions underway, there will truly be a paradigm shift in the evolution of the MDMP. Like its analog predecessor, the e-MDMP must also be flexible and adaptable to changing conditions and environments — not only on the battlefield but in staff planning and preparation as well. The conversion of the MDMP into a digital resource is no longer a distant aspiration; it is a present imperative. Commanders at every level, up to and including the strategic, must prepare for the fundamental change in decision-making posture that the e-MDMP will demand. Those who embrace this shift early will be best positioned to leverage its full potential in the complex, fast-moving operational environments of modern warfare.
You’re 69% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.