This paper provides a comprehensive overview of mentoring, tracing the concept from its origins in Homer's Odyssey through its modern applications in education, business, and youth development. It defines formal and informal mentoring, examines why mentoring has grown more important as traditional family and community support structures have weakened, and identifies the qualities that make an effective mentor. Drawing on research by Jekielek et al. (2002), the paper outlines key characteristics of successful mentoring programs, including relationship duration, a developmental approach, and structured training. It also addresses what American teenagers specifically seek from mentoring relationships.
The paper demonstrates effective use of a literature synthesis structure: it introduces a concept, establishes its relevance in a changing social context, and then applies research findings to derive actionable conclusions. The use of parenthetical MLA-style citations throughout allows claims to be traced to specific sources without disrupting the essay's readability.
The paper opens with a historical and mythological introduction, then moves through a logical sequence: definition → social context → application fields → mentor qualities → program characteristics → teenage perspectives → conclusion. Each section builds on the previous one, moving from abstract to concrete. The conclusion effectively synthesizes the major arguments without introducing new material, and the Works Cited list is properly formatted in MLA style.
Human history is replete with stories and myths about relationships between mentors and their protégés. The term "mentor" has its origin in Homer's epic poem The Odyssey, in which Odysseus, while going to fight in the Trojan War, entrusts the care of his son Telemachus to his trusted adviser and friend, Mentor — who served not only as a counselor to Telemachus during Odysseus' twenty-year absence, but also as a guardian and guide (Kalbfleisch and Keyton 189). A similar mentor–protégé relationship appears in other myths, such as the one between Merlin the magician and King Arthur. More concrete examples can be found in American history: President Thomas Jefferson served as mentor to James Madison and James Monroe, both of whom went on to become U.S. Presidents themselves (Ibid.).
In recent times, educators, psychologists, and business leaders have recognized mentoring as an important tool for individual development, especially for "at-risk" youth. This paper describes what mentoring is, its importance in the modern-day context, the fields in which it can be applied, the desirable qualities of a mentor, and the characteristics of successful mentoring programs. It also examines what mentoring means to teenagers in America. (Note: protégés are sometimes called "mentees" in modern parlance.)
In the modern context, a mentor is a caring individual — usually an older adult — who serves as a positive role model, providing support, friendship, encouragement, guidance, and career counseling to a younger person. Mentoring, then, is the support, friendship, guidance, or counseling provided by a mentor to his or her mentee ("Some Questions and Answers").
Mentoring may be formal or informal in nature. Informal (or natural) mentoring occurs when a relationship between an adult — such as a coach, teacher, or neighbor — and a young person develops naturally. In such situations, an older, more experienced adult takes a younger person under his or her wing voluntarily and without any obligation to do so. Formal (or planned) mentoring, by contrast, consists of purposefully created programs that have specific goals, schedules, training for both mentors and mentees, and even evaluation procedures. Such formal mentoring programs are designed to help youths who may not otherwise have access to informal mentoring.
Traditionally, parents have been the main source of emotional, financial, and social support for their children in most societies. They are often joined by a larger network of extended family — including older siblings, grandparents, other relatives, neighbors, and community and religious organizations — in providing extra guidance and a sense of direction to younger people ("Some Questions and Answers").
In recent times, however, such support has weakened as more and more families are now headed by single parents. A comparison of U.S. Bureau of the Census figures between 1970 and 1994 shows that children under 18 not living with two parents increased from 41.5% to 66.7% among Black families, from 10.5% to 23.8% among White families, and from 22.3% to 36.3% among Hispanic families. In urban societies, fewer people know or regularly interact with their neighbors, and many lack the support of extended families. A larger share of working families also has limited community involvement due to time pressures. Community support is even weaker in areas plagued by poverty, divorce, teen pregnancy, drug abuse, and violence — problems that affect the youth population most acutely.
In such an environment, the importance of caring adults from beyond the family — mentors — who can provide support, guidance, and encouragement to disadvantaged youth is self-evident. In the words of former President Clinton: "People who grew up in difficult circumstances and yet are successful have one thing in common . . . at a critical junction in their early adolescence they had a positive relationship with a caring adult" (quoted in "A Message from the Secretary").
Mentoring can prove useful in a wide variety of settings. It is commonly used in educational institutions, especially with disadvantaged and "at-risk" students. Other fields in which mentoring is frequently applied include business organizations and health and safety. Special-purpose volunteer organizations such as Big Brothers Big Sisters in the United States have also adopted mentoring as their core principle, providing volunteer mentors to children and young people who need them. They offer youth development through one-on-one mentoring for children who come primarily from single-parent families (Reh).
The application of mentoring is not restricted to educational or work-related settings. It can also provide individuals with opportunities to enhance cultural awareness, aesthetic appreciation, and the potential to lead meaningful lives (Kerka, "New Perspectives on Mentoring").
Not every adult can be an effective mentor. There are certain inherent and learned qualities that make one a good mentor. For example, it is desirable for a mentor to have strong interpersonal skills — specifically, the person should enjoy working with young people, be a patient and good listener, be confident in his or her own abilities and achievements, and be willing to share personal experiences relevant to the needs of the protégé.
A good mentor must also exhibit strong supervisory skills: helping students set developmental goals, create action plans, and manage their time; providing feedback and coaching to reinforce positive behavior; and being willing to assume and demonstrate leadership. Most importantly, a good mentor must be genuinely interested in the growth and success of other people — with a sincere desire to be part of other people's lives, to help them pursue their interests, achieve their goals, and navigate tough decisions. Those mentors who can empathize and convey respect and dignity toward their mentees are better able to win their trust and are, as a result, more successful. Effective mentors also demonstrate resilience and commitment (Young and Wright).
A 2002 study by Jekielek et al. found that the success of mentoring programs depends greatly on their duration — the longer the mentoring relationship, the greater the chances of success. Specifically, mentees involved in mentoring relationships lasting more than 12 months skipped fewer school days, achieved higher grades, and were less likely to use drugs or alcohol. By contrast, those in mentoring relationships of shorter duration (3–6 months) experienced no significant improvements in academic, social, or substance-use outcomes (Jekielek et al.).
The same study found, perhaps surprisingly, that the participants who made the greatest gains were those who were the most disadvantaged and most "at risk." Young people who entered mentoring programs with good grades and strong attendance records, by comparison, tended to remain on a plateau.
Another important conclusion of the study was that mentoring programs driven primarily by the needs and interests of the youth — a "developmental" approach — are more likely to succeed than programs structured around the expectations of adult volunteers, which the study termed a "prescriptive" approach.
"What Young People Want from a Mentor." The National Mentoring Partnership. n.d.
Young, Clara Y., and James V. Wright. "Mentoring: The Components for Success." Journal of Instructional Psychology. Sept. 2001.
You’re 66% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.