How to Eat a Poem: Merriam and Hughes Compared
This short reflection paper compares two poems that use food as a central metaphor: Eve Merriam's "How to Eat a Poem" and Langston Hughes' "Dinner Guest: Me." The paper explores Merriam's argument that poetry should be consumed freely and without over-analysis, then considers how Hughes applies a similar metaphorical framework to deliver pointed social commentary on race. The writer argues that both poems demonstrate poetry's unique power to convey meaning more effectively than prose, and that accessible, unfragmented reading produces the deepest appreciation of a poem's impact.
- Introduction: A Metaphor Worth Savoring: Merriam's poem argues for free, unguarded reading
- Eve Merriam and the Art of Reading Poetry: Poetry as a whole, unfragmented experience
- Langston Hughes and Social Commentary Through Food: Hughes uses food metaphor to address race
- Poetry as a More Effective Medium Than Prose: Both poems show poetry's power over prose
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The writer moves organically from personal reaction ("at first... seemed like an excuse") to genuine insight, which creates an authentic and readable voice.
- The comparison between the two poems is tight and purposeful — both share a food metaphor, yet serve completely different thematic ends, and the paper makes that contrast clear without overcomplicating it.
- Specific textual quotations anchor the analysis and show that claims are grounded in the actual poems rather than vague impressions.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates brief but effective close reading: the writer selects short, precise quotations ("a knife or fork or spoon / or plate or napkin or tablecloth"; "there is no core / or stem ... To throw away") and uses them to support interpretive claims about theme and tone, rather than simply summarizing the poems.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a personal reaction that transitions into thematic analysis of Merriam's poem, then pivots to Hughes as a contrasting example of the same metaphor applied differently. A brief concluding paragraph synthesizes both poems into a broader claim about poetry's effectiveness as a literary form. At roughly 350 words, it is a compact but complete reflection essay.
At first, Eve Merriam's "How to Eat a Poem" seemed like an excuse for a silly metaphor. However, after reading the poem I realized that the poet does an excellent job of writing a poem about poetry itself. Its underlying message rings true: poetry should be devoured and savored fully for its personal impact. Poems should not be eaten delicately, as with "a knife or fork or spoon / or plate or napkin or tablecloth." They are not elite gourmet meals, and they should not be treated — or read — that way. Rather, poems should be consumed without worrying about correct interpretations or analysis. The essence of a poem cannot be enjoyed if the reader is too polite and afraid, or too ready to discard certain parts of it. I appreciated this because too often, people pick apart poems in an attempt to eat them "politely."
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.