Research Paper Undergraduate 1,325 words

Sexual Harassment and Assault Among Military Women: A Comparative Study

~7 min read

Abstract

This research project investigates whether women in the military experience higher rates of workplace sexual harassment and sexual assault than civilian women, and examines reporting behavior differences between the two groups. Using a survey methodology with 100 military women and 100 college-age civilian women (ages 18–23), the study tested four hypotheses regarding prevalence and reporting rates. Findings reveal that military women reported sexual harassment at six times the rate of civilian women (42% vs. 7%) and sexual assault at more than twice the rate (36% vs. 16%). Additionally, military women were significantly less likely to report these incidents: only 26% of harassed military women reported incidents compared to 71% of civilian women, and just 19% of assaulted military women reported compared to 63% of civilian women. The research suggests institutional and cultural factors may discourage reporting in military contexts.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

Clear research structure with explicitly stated hypotheses and corresponding theories grounded in institutional analysis rather than individual psychology.
Transparent methodology that details sampling procedures, questionnaire design with operational definitions of harassment and assault, and sample size calculations with confidence intervals.
Comparative design that isolates military context as a variable by directly contrasting military and civilian populations rather than studying military women in isolation.
Honest acknowledgment of limitations (small sample size, age-restricted populations, potential selection bias) that strengthens rather than undermines credibility.
Data presentation that clearly supports each hypothesis, showing not only prevalence differences but the critical finding that reporting disparities exceed prevalence disparities.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates hypothesis-driven empirical research with theory-grounded interpretation. Rather than collecting data exploratively, the author specified four testable hypotheses paired with explicit theoretical mechanisms (e.g., institutional inadequacy in enforcement, pervasive male privilege, chain-of-command concerns, proximity to assailants). This structure allows readers to evaluate not just whether the data support the predictions, but whether the theoretical explanations are plausible, creating space for discussion of institutional versus individual factors.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a formal research design sequence: goal and variables → hypotheses with theories → sampling plan → data collection instruments (cover letter and survey) → literature review establishing prior evidence → comparative data tables → interpretation against hypotheses → reflexive discussion of limitations. This structure mirrors how empirical research is actually conducted and reported in social science, making it both educationally transparent and professionally formatted.

Introduction and Research Framework

Goal Statement: This research project aims to determine whether women in the military are subjected to greater rates of workplace sexual harassment than women outside of the military.

Independent Variables:

Research Questions:

Hypothesis 1 (H1): Women in the military experience greater rates of workplace sexual harassment than women who are not in the military.

Theory 1 (T1): The military does not discourage and punish workplace sexual harassment as effectively as the private sector.

Hypothesis 2 (H2): Women in the military experience greater rates of sexual assault than women who are not in the military.

Hypotheses and Theoretical Foundations

Theory 2 (T2): A pervasive atmosphere of male privilege in the military actually encourages sexual assaults, putting women in the military at heightened risk.

Hypothesis 3 (H3): Women in the military are less likely to report sexual harassment than women outside of the military.

Theory 3 (T3): Women are discouraged from reporting sexual harassment in the military because such reports undermine their authority and are perceived as threats to the military chain of command.

Hypothesis 4 (H4): Women in the military are less likely to report sexual assault than women outside of the military.

Theory 4 (T4): Women in the military may be forced to continue to interact with their assailants regardless of whether or not they report offenses, making them fear the repercussions for reporting more than civilian women.

Methodology and Sampling

This research project was designed to determine whether women in the military face greater rates of sexual assault and workplace sexual harassment than civilian women. The research employs a descriptive design with comparative groups. Questionnaires were administered to two groups of women: one group serving in the military and another group not in the military. After selection for military and non-military status, as well as age, race, and socioeconomic status, samples were randomized. Data were analyzed using Excel.

A cover letter was sent to the commander of the local military base informing of the project, though formal approval was not requested. Since data collection involved administration of a simple survey, the process took approximately one week. Questionnaires were submitted to a group of military women ages 18–23 and a group of college women in the same age range.

The study aims to illuminate whether women in the military face greater rates of sexual assault and sexual harassment than civilian women. Because women in the military are expected to provide safety and security for all Americans, their ability to fulfill this mission must be considered compromised if they do not feel safe and secure.

A sample size of 100 women from the military produced a sampling error of 9.8% based on a 95% confidence interval.

According to Street, Stafford, Mahan, and Hendricks (2008) in their article "Sexual harassment and assault experienced by reservists during military service: prevalence and health correlates" published in the Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, sexual harassment represents a major problem in today's military. Both male and female reservists reported high rates of both sexual harassment and assault. Women experienced sexual harassment at roughly twice the rate of males, though 27.2% of males reported sexual harassment. However, women reported sexual assaults at a much greater rate than men; women were approximately ten times more likely to be sexually assaulted than men. Significantly, this article investigated the lingering effects of sexual assault and harassment, making clear that military sexual assault and harassment are problems with implications for society as a whole, since survivors experience negative physical and mental health consequences.

Literature Review

McCall-Hosenfeld, Liebschutz, Spiro, and Seaver (2009) examined "Sexual assault in the military and its impact on sexual satisfaction in women veterans: a proposed model" in the Journal of Women's Health. Their research made clear that military sexual assault has lingering impacts on women, even after they leave service. However, being a survivor of sexual assault was not as strongly correlated to post-assault sexual satisfaction as other measures, including overall mental health. This suggests that although the military cannot change the fact that an alarming number of women in service have been victims of sexual assault, by providing appropriate follow-up mental health care, the military may be able to attenuate some of the damages caused by these assaults. While this study focused specifically on sexual satisfaction, the same results might be expected in other areas.

Distribution of Sexual Harassment:

The data show a significant disparity in reported sexual harassment between military and non-military women:

This table supports Hypothesis H1, which states that women in the military are subjected to workplace sexual harassment at greater rates than civilian women.

Distribution of Sexual Assault:

Sexual assault prevalence also differs substantially between the two groups:

3 Locked Sections · 680 words remaining

Data Analysis and Results · 240 words

"Comparative prevalence and reporting rates across four measures"

Findings and Conclusions · 280 words

"Summary of key disparities and interpretation of findings"

Study Limitations and Future Directions · 160 words

"Discussion of sample size constraints and methodological improvements"

You’re 57% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Sexual Harassment Prevalence Reporting Disparities Military Culture Comparative Research Design Institutional Barriers Sexual Assault Rates Chain of Command Civilian vs. Military