This paper examines health and safety practices within Australia's mining industry, which has long been regarded as a global leader in miner welfare. It outlines the regulatory and policy framework underpinning the sector, including the Safety Engineering Model used to address unsafe acts and conditions. Despite this strong reputation, the paper highlights a troubling rise in injuries and fatalities between 2012–13 and 2013–14, suggesting that safety performance is declining rather than improving. The paper evaluates the gap between current practices and the industry's zero-harm target, and concludes with recommendations including enhanced risk assessment, better safety indicators, improved stakeholder information sharing, and the identification of high-risk areas.
The mining industry in Australia is traditionally renowned for establishing best practices geared towards promoting the health and safety of miners as they engage in their various activities. Through the use of these best practices and safety solutions, Australia's mining sector has developed into a global leader in health and safety. According to the Australian Trade Commission (2014), the health and safety of miners in the country's mining industry has been partly attributable to the use of an effective, world-class regulatory and policy framework. Moreover, the Australian government collaborates with industry players and stakeholders to ensure that the mining sector remains free from injuries, fatalities, and disease.
The Australian government currently utilizes a Safety Engineering Model (SEM) that has helped address unsafe acts and unsafe conditions within the mining sector (Cliff, 2012). This model forms a central part of the broader occupational health and safety regulatory framework that governs mining operations across the country. The SEM reflects the government's commitment to systematic, engineering-based approaches to risk reduction, rather than relying solely on behavioral interventions.
Despite the Australian mining industry's reputation as a world leader in miner health and safety, a recent increase in accidents and unfortunate incidents has generated serious concerns about the sector's safety performance (Stutsel, 2014). Recent accidents have indicated that there is a need for improved health and safety solutions in order to achieve the goal of zero harm. Evekall, Gillespie, and Riege (2008) state that incidence rates exceeding the zero-harm target have demonstrated the need for improvement across the entire Australian mining industry.
The increased occurrence of safety incidents suggests that safety in Australia's mining sector is slightly deteriorating and requires urgent attention. This failure to improve is also reflected in the sector's inability to achieve its zero-harm target, even as Australia maintains its status as a global leader in miner health and safety. Recent reports and surveys have shown that there is a need to re-evaluate and rethink the assumptions and foundations underlying the health and safety solutions currently in use. Australia experienced a notable spike in mining fatalities in 2013–14 compared to the 2012–13 period, indicating that safety outcomes are worsening rather than improving. According to occupational safety and health principles, such trends demand immediate policy review and corrective action.
Given these trends, various proposals have been put forward to enhance safety in mining in Australia as part of a broader effort to rethink the health and safety solutions currently in use. One key recommendation is to strengthen risk assessment and management processes that enable early detection and prevention of potentially hazardous situations that could compromise miner health and safety. For instance, in the coal mining industry, the Australian government and industry stakeholders have adopted risk assessment approaches that improve plant safety and the storage of dangerous chemicals (Joy, 2004).
Secondly, mining safety in Australia can be enhanced through the use of meaningful safety indicators, improved information sharing between relevant stakeholders, and systematic identification of high-risk areas (Ekevall, Gillespie & Riege, 2008). These measures, taken together, represent a more proactive and data-driven approach to occupational safety management that could help the sector close the gap between its current performance and its zero-harm ambitions.
Australia has long been renowned as a world leader in mining safety. This position has been attributable to various factors, including the use of effective health and safety solutions and active collaboration between the government and industry stakeholders. However, the country has experienced a recent increase in injuries and fatalities in the mining sector, indicating a decline in safety performance. Given this trend, safety in Australia's mining sector appears to be deteriorating rather than improving, which underscores the need to evaluate current safety policies and practices and implement the kinds of reforms that can restore the sector's progress toward the goal of zero harm.
Australian Trade Commission. (2014, June). Australia's mining health and safety systems. Retrieved from Australian Government website.
"Risk assessment, indicators, and stakeholder information sharing"
Joy, J. (2004). Occupational safety risk management in Australian mining. Occupational Medicine, 54(5), 311–315.
Stutsel, M. (2014, July 28). Evaluating safety and health in Australia's mining sector. Retrieved May 19, 2017, from
You’re 90% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.