This paper applies Henry Mintzberg's ten managerial roles framework to evaluate interviews conducted with three working managers: a computer consulting manager, a medical supply assistant manager, and a weekend bank branch manager. The paper first introduces and defines all ten roles across Mintzberg's three subcategories — interpersonal, informational, and decisional — then systematically assesses how each manager performs within those roles. By comparing the three subjects, the analysis reveals significant differences in managerial latitude, role importance, and time allocation, ultimately drawing conclusions about the relative scope and function of each position within its organizational context.
The paper demonstrates applied framework analysis — taking an established theoretical model (Mintzberg's role typology) and systematically mapping real-world data onto it. Each role is treated as an analytical lens rather than a checklist, allowing the author to draw meaningful conclusions about differences in managerial latitude and organizational structure across the three subjects.
The paper opens with a theoretical framing of leadership and introduces Mintzberg's framework, then profiles the three interview subjects. The body is organized by Mintzberg's three subcategories — interpersonal, informational, and decisional — with each role addressed comparatively across all three managers. The conclusion synthesizes the findings to rank the relative scope of each managerial position.
Organizational theory and academic business discourse examine, among a host of other key organizational principles, the formal idea that leadership is an essential part of effective management — or, for that matter, an essential part of contributing effectively to any working team. However, like many academic concepts that do not easily make the leap into real-world applicability, this theoretical conception of leadership is just that: theoretical. In practice, this type of educational content and perspective is actually quite a bit less relevant than the curricula of formal education might argue (Koskella, 2002, p. 1).
While leadership is unquestionably an inborn talent that can be honed and improved, it is nonetheless an individualized talent and therefore both rarified and special. The dually important aspects of experience and ability cannot be taught in an academic context. Especially in the organizational sense, one must gather and sharpen these respective qualities — suggesting that leadership theory bears only a passing relationship to those instincts and principles which one must know, or of which one must be capable, in order to function successfully in an organizational leadership role.
Ultimately, this means that a leader with the proper merits to effectively steward an organization is one who will demonstrate the capacity for a formal application of proven leadership methods while simultaneously adapting to the demands specific to the organization in question. This formal application of proven leadership methods is drawn for the purposes of this discussion from Henry Mintzberg's theory of managerial roles, with the ten such roles he provides offering a framework for assessing the outcome of the three managerial interviews here conducted.
For Mintzberg, the ten roles are divided into three subcategories: interpersonal, informational, and decisional. Before proceeding to the interview analysis, it is appropriate to identify and define each of Mintzberg's roles.
1. Figurehead: The manager functions as a representative for those over whom he or she presides, serving in a capacity that is both symbolic and practical.
2. Leader: Leadership is a core duty of managerial competence, descending from a responsibility to encourage motivation and to function as an authority to other team members.
3. Liaison: Often, the manager will be the key channel through which information, ideas, and relationships pass.
4. Monitor: The manager is expected to maintain a certain degree of information based on observation both internal and external to the organization, making him or her a key vessel for insight into organizational goals and demands.
5. Disseminator: The manager typically functions in the visible role of providing access to selected information for members of the organization.
6. Spokesperson: This role sees the manager addressing the public or the world external to the organization in representation of the organization and its personnel.
7. Entrepreneur: The manager will, of course, be a significant decision-maker where strategy, design, and implementation of organizational functions are concerned.
8. Disturbance Handler: It is the responsibility of an effective manager to mediate conflict, address challenging dilemmas, and navigate an organization through crisis.
9. Resource Allocator: The manager plays a key role in identifying the appropriate avenues for the distribution of resources and financial priorities.
10. Negotiator: The manager engages other parties and organizations directly on behalf of his or her organization in order to attain agreement or compromise toward mutual goals.
These roles are particularly useful as we proceed in consideration of the three managers who agreed to be subjects of our interviews. Mintzberg's ten managerial roles are all well exemplified by the responsibilities, concerns, and preoccupations of the three individuals considered.
1st Manager (Computer Consulting Manager): The first manager who agreed to the interview process manages a computer consulting firm. Working under only the company's owner — who serves largely in an administrative capacity — the manager is chiefly responsible for presiding over a staff of eight, which includes three house-call consultants, three technical support call-center specialists, a networking specialist, and an administrative assistant. Beginning as a consultant himself, the manager worked his way into a leadership position over six years, allowing the firm's owner to step away from day-to-day business. He earns $60,000 per annum and spends the vast majority of his time overseeing the duties of his personnel, though he also spends some time working in the field, as he remains a qualified computer technician and consultant.
2nd Manager (Medical Supply Manager): The second manager who agreed to the interview is an assistant manager for a small medical supply company specializing in wound care supplies such as bandages and gauze pads. He has held this position for three years and oversees a team of six, including a chemist, three production specialists, a delivery driver, and a stock/inventory worker. Earning roughly $36,000, he answers directly to the head manager of the company, who is hands-on but allows the production and stock rooms to be presided over by the assistant manager.
Using the roles of management provided by Mintzberg, it is possible to assess the degree of effectiveness and control afforded to the three managers interviewed. Based on each manager's reported importance of and time spent on each of the ten outlined roles, and the analysis presented above, it is possible to evaluate the legitimacy and scope of their respective managerial positions.
You’re 36% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.