This paper examines Mary E. Wilkins Freeman's short story "A Mistaken Charity" (1887), focusing on its portrayal of two elderly sisters, Harriet and Charlotte, who struggle to maintain their independence in rural New England. The analysis addresses how the story challenges the assumption that elderly or disabled individuals are incapable of self-sufficiency, while also exploring how upper-class women use charitable acts to assert moral superiority and dominance over their lower-class neighbors. The paper draws on feminist criticism to highlight themes of integrity, courage, class tension, and the redemptive power of rebellion against paternalistic interference.
Mary E. Wilkins Freeman's A Mistaken Charity (1887) is a story that explores the tensions between coping with the infirmities of old age and the passionate desire to live an independent life. As Marsha Saxton (1987) notes, Freeman dispels the myth that elderly or disabled people are completely dependent on others and incapable of directing their own lives. The story is a quiet but forceful argument for the dignity and self-determination of those society too readily dismisses.
The story centers on two sisters who never married. Mary E. Wilkins Freeman portrays Harriet as the strong one — determined to stay independent and out of the poorhouse. She may be somewhat deaf, but she is far from defeated. Charlotte, her sister, is considerably more fragile and is also blind. The sisters live in rural New England in a small, rent-free, ramshackle house with a terribly leaky roof. They maintain a small garden and occasionally catch a trout in a nearby stream. Thoughtful neighbors stop by from time to time with food. Despite these hardships, Harriet and Charlotte manage.
One neighbor, a busybody named Mrs. Simonds, decides that the women simply cannot make it on their own. Although Harriet insists that "nothing short of Gabriel's trumpet will get us out of our house," the sisters are ultimately carted off to a rest home. It does not take long for them to realize that living among the "proper" ladies is not for them. Even the gentle Charlotte is willing to do anything to return home (Freeman, 1887).
At its heart, A Mistaken Charity is a story about personal autonomy and the right to define one's own way of living. Harriet's fierce resistance to being removed from her home is not mere stubbornness; it is an assertion of identity and dignity. Even Charlotte, who might appear to be the more passive of the two, ultimately shares her sister's determination to reclaim their life together. Freeman presents both women not as passive victims of circumstance but as active agents in their own story, capable of defining what home and independence mean to them.
Feminist critic Judith Fetterley (2003) offers a compelling framework for reading the story's social dynamics. She analyzes the way upper-class women gain their sense of identity by taking a charitable interest in their lower-class neighbors. This apparent benevolence, Fetterley argues, is actually a form of takeover and domination, one that is purchased at the expense of those it claims to help. Paternalistic charity, in this reading, becomes a mechanism through which social hierarchies are reinforced rather than dissolved. Mrs. Simonds's well-meaning intervention is therefore not simply misguided — it is an exercise of class power dressed up as moral concern.
This interpretation reframes the story's central conflict: it is not merely about two elderly women being forced into a rest home, but about the broader social structures that permit one group to override another's autonomy under the guise of care. Freeman's regionalist fiction consistently exposes the quiet coercions embedded in everyday social relations, and A Mistaken Charity is among her most pointed examples of this critique.
A Mistaken Charity focuses on women's integrity, courage, and, at times, privation. In this story, Freeman shows how rebellion can sometimes be good and right — a necessary act of self-preservation against a world that confuses control with kindness.
"Upper-class charity as domination and power"
Saxton, M., & Howe, F. (Eds.). (1987). With wings. New York: Feminist Press.
You’re 93% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.