Neo-Aristotelian Criticism of Obama's Campaign Speech
This paper applies the Neo-Aristotelian method of rhetorical criticism to one of Barack Obama's campaign speeches delivered in Virginia. It argues that this critical framework is the most appropriate analytical lens because Obama's speech is structured around Aristotle's five canons of classical rhetoric: invention, organization, style, delivery, and memory. The paper also evaluates why feminist criticism is a less suitable method for analyzing this speech, noting that the speech's primary purpose is to rally all Virginia voters rather than to address gender-specific concerns. Through close analysis of the Greenwood story and Obama's use of a recurring slogan, the paper demonstrates how the Neo-Aristotelian framework effectively illuminates the speech's rhetorical construction and political objectives.
- Introduction: Choosing the Right Critical Framework: Argues Neo-Aristotelian method best fits the speech
- The Five Canons of Classical Rhetoric in Obama's Speech: Maps invention and organization onto Obama's speech
- Style, Delivery, and Audience Engagement: Examines body language, intonation, and audience immersion
- Memory and the Greenwood Slogan: Analyzes how the Greenwood story reinforces collective memory
- Why Feminist Criticism Falls Short: Refutes feminist criticism as unsuitable for this speech
- Conclusion: Neo-Aristotelian Criticism as the Best Fit: Reaffirms superiority of Neo-Aristotelian framework
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically works through all five Aristotelian canons—invention, organization, style, delivery, and memory—applying each directly to specific elements of Obama's speech, which gives the argument concrete grounding.
- It strengthens its central claim by engaging in comparative criticism, evaluating feminist criticism as an alternative and explaining why it is less appropriate, rather than simply asserting one method's superiority.
- Specific textual references, such as the Greenwood story and the recurring campaign slogan, anchor abstract rhetorical concepts in observable evidence.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative method selection—a technique in rhetorical criticism where a scholar justifies the chosen analytical framework by measuring it against at least one alternative. By acknowledging that feminist criticism has some surface-level applicability (the speech features women prominently) before refuting it on substantive grounds, the paper models how to engage counterarguments honestly and systematically.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by asserting the Neo-Aristotelian method as most appropriate, then moves through each of the five canons in turn. It pivots to address feminist criticism, conceding limited merit before rejecting it on thematic and purposive grounds. The conclusion synthesizes both lines of argument to reaffirm the central claim. This structure follows a classic claim–support–counterargument–reaffirmation pattern common in rhetorical criticism essays.
Introduction: Choosing the Right Critical Framework
The Neo-Aristotelian method of criticism is the most appropriate framework for analyzing Obama's speech, for several reasons. Most importantly, the speech appears to be constructed around the five canons of classical rhetoric that Aristotle identified. The use of invention is essential: the story Obama tells does not necessarily need to be literally true, but it serves as an excellent introduction and a way to draw the audience toward the real purpose of the speech. That purpose only emerges in the second part: the slogan intended to carry the state of Virginia into Obama's camp.
The Five Canons of Classical Rhetoric in Obama's Speech
The organization of the speech, as well as its style and delivery, are also significant elements that only the Neo-Aristotelian method can properly emphasize. Together, these elements allow the audience to become part of Obama's experience. When he tells the story about Greenwood, listeners can feel as though they are standing outside in the rain, meeting the small, five-foot-tall woman from that town. This illustrates precisely why style is so central to the senator's speech.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.