This reading response examines Noel Kent's 1997 essay "The New Campus Racism," which argues that racism on American college campuses mirrors the broader contradictions of post–Civil Rights American society. While overt discrimination has been formally eliminated through legislation and institutional policy, a subtler form of racism persists — particularly as experienced by Black students. The paper explores how white and Black students define racism differently, how affirmative action fuels resentment, and how seemingly neutral behaviors such as forming Black student unions are misread as reverse racism. The response concludes by connecting Kent's thesis to the racially charged political climate surrounding President Obama's election.
In his 1997 essay The New Campus Racism, Noel Kent describes two very different points of view about race in American society — as observed on college campuses and in the broader national culture that, he argues, provides the model for the collegiate microcosm. Kent contends that three decades after the Civil Rights Movement, the United States represents an "odd mixture of striking movement and surface change." By this he means that on one level, racism has been formally eliminated through post–Civil Rights legislation and official government and institutional policies; yet on an entirely different level, racism still permeates American society — particularly from the perspective of minorities, and Black Americans in particular.
Whereas overt discrimination and racial persecution are largely vestiges of the past in the United States, racism remains alive and well on a more subtle level throughout American society, including on college campuses. Kent's essay is concerned with mapping this gap between formal racial equality and lived racial experience.
Kent explains that perceptions about racism differ tremendously depending on one's perspective as a white or Black college student. More specifically, white students tend to equate racism with color consciousness and racial equality with color blindness. Black students, and Black Americans more generally, tend to define racism quite differently — in terms of the comparative opportunities available to members of minority races and the persisting differential that still exists in political influence and other forms of meaningful power in society.
Kent describes a common form of racism that exists at a much lower level than the outright exclusions of the pre–Civil Rights era. For example, when contemporary Black college students act in ways normally associated with cultural identity or pride — such as forming Black student unions or choosing to live in Black dormitories — white students often perceive these actions as a form of reverse racism and purposeful exclusion. This misreading, Kent argues, reflects a deeper failure to understand how racial identity functions for those who have historically been marginalized.
"Affirmative action fuels white resentment and subtle bias"
"Obama's presidency reveals racial tensions Kent predicted"
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.