Racism Since the Civil Rights Movement: Progress and Persistence
This paper investigates whether racism has changed since the Civil Rights Movement and evaluates whether those changes are positive or negative. It distinguishes between de jure and de facto segregation, and between individual and systemic racism—including institutional and structural forms. The paper presents statistical evidence of persistent racial disparities in education, wealth accumulation, voting rights, housing, and employment. While acknowledging genuine progress such as increased representation of African Americans in leadership roles and the psychological benefits of positive role models, the paper concludes that racism has improved in some respects but that significant social and economic inequities remain, perpetuating disadvantage for minorities through indirect mechanisms that require continued reform.
- De Jure and De Facto Segregation: Legal segregation prohibited; informal segregation persists
- Individual and Systemic Racism: Personal prejudice reinforced by institutional and structural racism
- Educational Disparities and Achievement Gaps: Racial minorities face suspension, limited course access, under-resourced schools
- Economic Inequality and the Wealth Gap: Median white household wealth vastly exceeds black household wealth
- Voting Rights and Political Participation: Voting Rights Act struck down; voter ID laws disproportionately affect minorities
- Housing Discrimination and Lending Practices: Subtle discrimination in showing homes and predatory subprime lending persist
- Interracial Contact and Cultural Representation: Personal relationships and positive role models reduce racial bias
- Conclusion: Progress and Unfinished Work: Racism improved in some ways; structural barriers remain
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Establishes a clear analytical framework by distinguishing de jure from de facto segregation early, allowing the reader to understand that legal prohibition does not eliminate actual inequality.
- Uses abundant empirical evidence (school suspension rates, wealth statistics, voting patterns, lending disparities) to ground abstract claims about systemic racism in measurable facts.
- Acknowledges genuine progress (Obama's election, increased representation) while refusing to conflate symbolic advancement with structural change, demonstrating balanced analysis.
- Connects disparities across multiple domains (education, housing, voting, employment) to show how racism operates as an interconnected system rather than isolated incidents.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper employs definition-supported argumentation: it opens by defining key terms (de jure/de facto segregation, individual vs. systemic racism, institutional vs. structural racism) and then uses those definitions as a scaffold for evidence. This technique allows the writer to move systematically through different manifestations of racism without losing conceptual coherence. Each section introduces a new domain (education, wealth, voting, housing) and shows how racism persists within it despite formal legal changes.
Structure breakdown
The essay follows a problem-analysis-qualified-conclusion structure. The introduction establishes that legal equality does not equal actual equality. The middle sections provide detailed evidence of how racism persists across four major institutional areas, supported by citations and statistics. The penultimate section introduces a countervailing point—interracial contact and cultural representation as mechanisms for change—before the conclusion offers a nuanced answer: racism has improved in some respects but economic and cultural barriers remain, requiring ongoing effort.
De Jure and De Facto Segregation
According to the law, there are two types of segregation commonly practiced: de jure (legally enforced segregation) and de facto (not legally mandated, but existing in fact). De jure racial segregation is now prohibited in the U.S. However, de facto segregation still exists in many, if not most, areas of the country. While de facto segregation may no longer be officially permitted, de jure segregation remains in many ways just as strong as it was before the Civil Rights Movement, thanks in part to the growing economic inequality in America.
Individual and Systemic Racism
Racism is also often classified as both an individual and a systemic problem. According to some people, racism is purely a personal issue: "Individual racism refers to an individual's racist assumptions, beliefs or behaviours" and is "a form of racial discrimination that stems from conscious and unconscious, personal prejudice" ("Forms of Racism," 2014). However, racism, particularly racism against historically-discriminated groups, cannot be simply reduced to individual preferences in terms of its impact. "Individual racism is connected to/learned from broader socio-economic histories and processes and is supported and reinforced by systemic racism" ("Forms of Racism," 2014).
Systemic racism is the product of the system of racism and exists in two forms. Institutional racism is "racial discrimination that derives from individuals carrying out the dictates of others who are prejudiced or of a prejudiced society," such as failing to hire someone because of their race. Structural racism refers to "inequalities rooted in the system-wide operation of a society that excludes substantial numbers of members of particular groups from significant participation in major social institutions," such as the fact that individuals born to privilege have better access to elite schools and thus greater promotional possibilities ("Forms of Racism," 2014).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.