This paper examines the four core concepts of the nursing metaparadigm—nursing, person, environment, and health—drawing on peer-reviewed literature to establish foundational definitions. It then compares these concepts with the philosophy, mission, vision, and values of a healthcare organization, identifying points of alignment around holistic, human-centered care and continuous innovation. The paper proceeds to offer personalized definitions of each metaparadigm concept, informed by lived professional experience, before synthesizing these insights into a personal nursing philosophy. That philosophy integrates compassionate, patient-centered care with evidence-based practice, recognizing the dynamic nature of health, the complexity of human experience, the influence of environment, and the necessity of cultural competence and lifelong learning.
The paper exemplifies comparative analysis paired with reflective synthesis. Rather than treating theory and practice as separate domains, it systematically maps each metaparadigm concept onto a real organizational context (mission, vision, values, philosophy), then personalizes those mappings into original definitions. This technique — anchoring reflection in both literature and institutional context — is a hallmark of graduate-level nursing theory writing.
The paper follows a five-part structure: (1) an introduction that previews the full argument; (2) a literature-based overview of the four metaparadigm concepts; (3) a compare-and-contrast section organized by philosophical, mission, vision, and value dimensions; (4) personalized redefinitions of each concept enriched by professional perspective; and (5) a multi-pillar personal nursing philosophy that synthesizes all prior sections, followed by a concise conclusion. Each section builds on the last, making the overall structure cumulative rather than merely additive.
The nursing metaparadigm is of major importance in nursing, and its concepts should intersect with the philosophy, mission, vision, and values of a healthcare organization. This paper examines that metaparadigm and compares it to the mission, vision, and values of the organization where the author works. First, the concepts of the nursing metaparadigm are examined. Then, they are compared and contrasted with the guiding principles of that organization, highlighting the synergies and differences between academic nursing theory and practical healthcare delivery. Following this, a personal interpretation and elaboration of these metaparadigm concepts is offered, culminating in a personal nursing philosophy. This philosophy focuses on applying personalized definitions and aligning them with the values of compassionate care and evidence-based practice.
The four core concepts associated with the nursing metaparadigm are nursing, person, environment, and health. The following definitions draw on peer-reviewed nursing literature.
Nursing is often defined as a science and an art that focuses on promoting quality of life as defined by individuals and communities, throughout their life experiences from birth to end-of-life care (Helming et al., 2020). It is viewed as something holistic — a practice that caters to the care of the whole individual. It is the practice of promoting health for the individual in accordance with that person's needs and goals.
The concept of the person in nursing is based on the individual but also includes consideration of families and communities. It emphasizes taking a holistic view of the person, accounting for both physical and psychosocial needs (Kuven & Giske, 2023). The person is not just an individual presenting with a sickness. The person is much more than that and requires empathy and compassion.
In nursing, the environment is not only the physical space but also includes the sociocultural and psychological aspects that impact a person's health and well-being (Rohde et al., 2020). It is seen as a major factor in the promotion and maintenance of health. To understand and help the person, one must understand the environment and how to improve it when necessary for the promotion of health.
Health in nursing is often viewed as the sum of physical, mental, and social well-being, and not exclusively as the absence of disease or infirmity. It includes a person's ability to maintain and manage their life despite the presence of illness (Kishore & Gawande, 2021).
These concepts are important to nursing as both an art and a science. The art of nursing is reflected in nurses' ability to show empathy and compassion. The science is represented in the nurse's ability to apply evidence-based practices and theoretical knowledge throughout the caregiving process.
The philosophy of nursing is grounded in the concept of holistic care, which promotes a comprehensive approach to patient well-being. This philosophy aligns closely with the organizational vision of providing human-centered, high-quality care. Both the nursing metaparadigm and the organization prioritize the overall well-being of individuals and recognize that health has many dimensions: physical, mental, emotional, and social.
An organizational mission to transform healthcare resonates strongly with the nursing metaparadigm's focus on dynamic health. This concept addresses the need for healthcare to be adaptable and responsive to the evolving needs of individuals and communities. The nursing metaparadigm therefore calls for a healthcare system that continuously adapts to new challenges, technologies, and patient needs. A shared commitment to progress and innovation in healthcare ensures that care remains effective and relevant to changing patient populations and healthcare environments.
An organizational vision that stresses innovation is a principle strongly reflected in the nursing metaparadigm. Nursing, as both an art and a science, is constantly evolving, integrating new research findings and best practices to enhance patient care. This ongoing integration of new knowledge and techniques mirrors a vision of continuous improvement and excellence in healthcare delivery. Both the nursing metaparadigm and forward-looking healthcare organizations recognize that the future of healthcare depends on the ability to adapt, innovate, and apply new understandings in clinical practice.
Values such as creativity, courage, compassion, collaboration, and connection are in harmony with key elements of the nursing metaparadigm. Nursing, at its core, is about providing empathetic and patient-centered care, which requires a compassionate approach. The emphasis on teamwork and collaboration in nursing aligns with organizational values of collaborative and connected care, recognizing that effective healthcare relies on the synergy of various professionals working together. The courage to do the right thing and the creativity to find new solutions are also integral to nursing practice, ensuring that patient care is not only compassionate but also innovative and ethical.
This exploration of the nursing metaparadigm and its application to both theoretical and practical healthcare contexts provides a comprehensive view of nursing's core concepts and nature. It demonstrates that nursing is a discipline that blends art with science and promotes the importance of holistic, patient-centered care. The comparison with an organization's philosophy, mission, vision, and values further illustrates how nursing theories are reflected and operationalized within healthcare settings. Personal interpretations and definitions of the nursing metaparadigm concepts emphasize the dynamic, complex, and adaptive nature of nursing, underscoring the importance of empathy, evidence-based practice, and cultural competence. The resulting personal nursing philosophy brings together these elements, advocating for a practice that is compassionate, evidence-based, and responsive to changes in the field. It highlights the necessity of understanding the changing and diverse needs of individuals and communities, the influence of environment on health, and the ongoing need for continuous professional development.
Helming, M. A. B., Shields, D. A., Avino, K. M., & Rosa, W. E. (2020). Dossey & Keegan's holistic nursing: A handbook for practice. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Kishore, S., & Gawande, K. (2021). Holistic health care for quality of life: Role of Heartfulness meditation for stress management. Fit India: Holistic Health Care for Quality Life, 47.
Kuven, B. M., & Giske, T. (2023). Hope that provides strength in illness — patients' perspectives: Nursing students' narratives after conversation with patients. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 37(4), 909–916.
Juanola, O., Martínez-López, S., Francés, R., & Gómez-Hurtado, I. (2021). Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Metabolic, genetic, epigenetic and environmental risk factors. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5227.
Rohde, L., Larsen, T. S., Jensen, R. L., & Larsen, O. K. (2020). Framing holistic indoor environment: Definitions of comfort, health and well-being. Indoor and Built Environment, 29(8), 1118–1136.
Wei, H. (2022). The development of an evidence-informed convergent care theory: Working together to achieve optimal health outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 9(1), 11–25.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.