This paper examines John Milton's Paradise Lost as a political allegory rooted in the context of the English Civil War (1642–1651). It traces Milton's personal political involvement — including his support for Cromwell and opposition to monarchy — and demonstrates how those convictions shaped the epic's thematic and stylistic structures. The paper argues that God represents ideal, non-tyrannical kingship while Satan functions as a complex figure of righteous rebellion against corrupt authority. It also analyzes how Milton's rhetorical techniques in the poem mirror those of his political prose, and how battlefield imagery in the poem evokes the lived experience of civil war. Together, these elements frame Paradise Lost as a deeply politicized literary work.
Paradise Lost is an epic tale of defeat and the consequences that come from breaking with the proper form of divine rule. In his work, John Milton pits Satan and his army against God in Heaven, illustrating the notorious Christian battle within particularly political contexts. The English Civil War played a large role in the creation of Milton's celebrated work. In fact, the work itself functions as a political allegory, in which its thematic structures invoke political tension through character allusions. This is most evident in Milton's description of the battle for Heaven and the tension between God — the supreme ruler — and the rebel figure of Satan. Moreover, the poem's stylistic structures mimic Milton's political prose, further connecting his political activism to the background and underlying structure of one of the most famous literary works in the Western tradition.
The English Civil War was a major influence on a number of literary and artistic works produced during this period. The beginning stages of the conflict lasted between 1642 and 1651 (Roberts 1). Royalists and Parliamentarians took up arms against one another in a struggle between the authority of the crown and the growing power of Parliament. King Charles I ruled as though he possessed a divine right to govern the people of England, and many opposition figures resented his desire to levy increased taxes, which were widely regarded as illegal at the time. Charles I also created tension within the country by failing to convene Parliament as frequently as many believed he should during the decade of the 1630s. This is contrasted with the more democratic view held by many members of Parliament, who believed the King was obligated to cooperate with Parliament. According to the research, "much of Parliament believed that the king had a contractual obligation to the people to rule without tyranny" (Roberts 1).
The year 1649 saw the execution of King Charles I and the beginning of a period of turmoil in which England had no king. The country was governed by a broadly republican government until 1653, when Oliver Cromwell was appointed as Lord Protector — "essentially a military dictator" (Roberts 1). Richard Cromwell, Oliver's son, succeeded him in 1658, which once again threw the nation into turmoil. Finally, in 1660, the monarchy was reinstated when Charles II, son of King Charles I, was restored as King of England in what became known as the Restoration.
Milton's political background is significant because it shaped both his creative works and his political prose. He began writing political prose in 1641 with the publication of Of Reformation Touching Church-Discipline in England (Online Library of Liberty 1). Milton was starkly opposed to King Charles I, who claimed that the court of England could not try him for treason because of his divine protection and right to rule — a claim Charles grounded in God's protection of the Kings of Israel. Milton held a very different interpretation of the Biblical texts and believed that the role of all men, including kings, was to support a divine hierarchy. In this view, a "tyrannical ruler contradicts this divine order, and the role of the king is primarily to maintain this order, rather than to destabilize it" (Roberts 1).
Milton was known for his support of Cromwell and was appointed Secretary for Foreign Languages in 1649 (Online Library of Liberty 1). This was "a position which involved acting as the voice of the English revolution to the world at large," a tradition that continued in his epic prose (Roberts 1). Milton wanted the monarchy replaced with a free commonwealth, which would further empower the citizens of England and protect them from the tyranny they had witnessed under recent monarchs. He fought against the reinstatement of King Charles II in his work The Readie and Easie Way to Establish a Free Commonwealth in 1660 and remained active in England's politics through his writing career until he died in 1674.
Milton's political beliefs were intimately intertwined with his religious beliefs, both of which became the founding thematic structures that later appeared in his prose and poetry. The research notes that "a close analysis reveals a subtle change in his thought away from the youthful orthodoxy which had led him to consider ordination as a priest, and towards the increasingly subversive theology which typifies his later writings" (Roberts 1). His creative prose was laden with political references and allusions, and his life's work reflects a consistent effort to bring those convictions into literary form.
The work Paradise Lost can be read as a political allegory in which thematic elements within the epic are "aligned with aspects of the political context of the poem's creation" (Roberts 1). In this political allegory, the characters occupy recognizable political situations: Milton "saw the events of the Christian myth he was retelling as paradigms or archetypes for the daily events of the Civil War" (Forsyth 63). The heavenly struggle comes to represent humanity's own fierce struggle against tyranny. As Forsyth explains, "the cosmic struggle and the origins of human sin were the main subjects of the epic, but those events could now be understood in the terms made clear by contemporary politics" (63). There is thus a deeply political structure within Milton's poetry, especially in his descriptions of God and Satan.
In this politicized reading of Paradise Lost, God is depicted first and foremost as a ruler. Rather than merely a figure of spiritual guidance and piety, he is a ruler who focuses on instituting laws upon his creations, men and women. God is the Father, and man is the Son — and thus man must obey God's rule. Milton presents this relationship as representing ideal kingship: rule that is not instituted through tyranny, as the citizens of England were forced to endure under King Charles I. God places restrictions on Adam and Eve, predominantly because he is their ruler and has the authority to do so. Yet these restrictions do not arise from selfishness or tyranny, but from love for His subjects and concern for their well-being. He sets rules to define His leadership, which Milton presents as a model of how kingship ought actually to function. Moreover, God's inaugural speech likens the deity to a kingly figure (Forsyth 63). He is a deeply politicized presence. God's army is ultimately successful in repelling the fallen angels because He is the supreme figure of kingly authority — and thus He must achieve victory, or Milton would effectively be arguing that even the most righteous kings are incapable of ruling justly.
Satan's rebellion — and the character of Satan himself — is central to Milton's political undertones. Milton's powerful representation of Satan in Paradise Lost constitutes another significant political tie to the English Civil War. Through this character, Milton exposes the "fear of change / Perplexes Monarchs" (Milton I.598–599). Satan represents a challenge to traditional monarchical rule, and his relatively sympathetic portrayal reveals how Milton supported such challenges in times of tyranny. Throughout the work, Satan is one of the primary political figures. As the research suggests, "Milton responded to and consciously or unconsciously reproduced these entangled aspects of war in his portrayal of the war in heaven" (Summers & Pebworth 235). Satan's speeches to his fellow fallen angels parallel Milton's own desire to advocate for a free commonwealth in the face of a restored monarchy in England.
Satan becomes a strange but highly political symbol of support for rebellion. Oddly enough, Milton turns Satan into a kind of "epic hero" (Summers & Pebworth 203). Satan and his angels are presented as unlikely epic heroes by virtue of their devotion to fighting for their ideals. They take up arms and employ military force and strategy as a means of creating a new political order. Satan's defeat also mirrors the defeat of those in England who had fought so hard for a commonwealth. This is reflected in the scene in which Satan is wounded on the battlefield by the archangel Michael. Milton writes:
"God as ideal king; Satan as rebel challenger"
"Satan's defeat mirroring Commonwealth's collapse"
"Rhetorical techniques linking poem to political writings"
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.