PepsiCo vs. Coca-Cola: Financial Ratio Analysis
This paper presents a comparative financial analysis of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola, two of the world's most recognizable beverage companies. Using data from their 2012 and 2013 annual reports and Form 10-K filings, the paper calculates and interprets key profitability ratios — including operating profit margin, net profit margin, and return on assets — for both firms. It also examines income statement trends in revenue and net income, and applies vertical analysis to balance sheet items such as current assets and current liabilities. The analysis finds that Coca-Cola consistently outperforms PepsiCo on profitability metrics, while PepsiCo generates higher total revenues due to its more diversified product portfolio. Notable corporate events, including Coca-Cola's partnership with Green Mountain Coffee and PepsiCo's product expansions, are also discussed as contextual factors shaping each company's financial trajectory.
- Company Overview and Industry Context: Background on the Pepsi-Coca-Cola rivalry and Cola Wars
- Profitability Ratio Analysis: Operating margin, net margin, and ROA compared for both firms
- Events Impacting the Companies: Coca-Cola's Green Mountain deal and PepsiCo product growth
- Income Statement Analysis: Revenue and net income trends for 2012 and 2013
- Balance Sheet and Vertical Analysis: Current assets and liabilities as percentage of total assets
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It applies a consistent analytical framework across both companies, calculating each ratio for PepsiCo and Coca-Cola in identical sequence and using the same base years, making direct comparison straightforward.
- The paper grounds each ratio in a brief conceptual definition before presenting calculations, which demonstrates command of the underlying financial concepts rather than merely reporting numbers.
- Incorporating real corporate events (the Coca-Cola/Green Mountain partnership and PepsiCo's product expansions) connects quantitative findings to qualitative business context, adding depth beyond pure ratio arithmetic.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates systematic comparative financial analysis: calculating the same set of ratios for two firms across two periods, interpreting directional changes (increases versus decreases), and synthesizing findings into an overall judgment. The vertical analysis section further shows competence in common-size statement construction, expressing balance sheet line items as percentages of total assets to enable meaningful cross-company comparison despite differences in scale.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief industry synopsis establishing the competitive context, then moves through three profitability ratios (operating profit margin, net profit margin, return on assets) presented with calculations for each firm. A short section on corporate events provides qualitative context. The income statement section compares revenue and net income trends, and the final section performs a balance sheet vertical analysis of current assets and current liabilities for both companies across 2012–2013.
Company Overview and Industry Context
PepsiCo and Coca-Cola are home to two of the most recognized and preferred beverages in the world. These two companies are fierce competitors in the beverage industry, constantly competing with one another with the primary objective of becoming the leading distributor of not just sodas but other beverages as well. This fierce rivalry is commonly referred to as the "Cola Wars" and began in the period leading up to the 1980s, growing increasingly intense ever since. During that era, PepsiCo boosted its market share at a time when Coca-Cola held the top position as the leading beverage supplier (PepsiCo Annual Report, 2013). Both companies aggressively advertised in their efforts to attain and sustain the number-one brand ranking globally, targeting different income levels around the world with appealing products offered at competitive prices.
Profitability Ratio Analysis
Profitability ratios indicate how effectively a company generates profit. The following is a profitability ratio analysis of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola Company.
The operating profit margin is calculated by dividing operating income by revenue. This ratio compares the amount of operating income to revenue and accounts for production-related expenses not directly tied to the production of goods or services, such as administrative expenses.
2012: 9,112 / 65,492 × 100 = 13.91%
2013: 9,705 / 66,415 × 100 = 14.61%
2012: 10,779 / 48,017 × 100 = 22.45%
2013: 10,228 / 46,854 × 100 = 21.83%
PepsiCo's operating profit margin increased from 2012 to 2013, rising by 0.70%. The figures indicate that in 2013, PepsiCo earned 14.61 cents in operating profit for every dollar of revenue. Coca-Cola's operating profit margin, by contrast, declined by 0.62% over the same period, with the company earning 21.83 cents in operating profit per dollar of revenue in 2013. Overall, Coca-Cola Company was more profitable than PepsiCo on this measure.
The net profit margin is calculated by dividing net income by revenue. This ratio reflects the company's overall profitability by comparing net income to total revenues.
2012: 6,178 / 65,492 × 100 = 9.43%
2013: 6,740 / 66,415 × 100 = 10.15%
2012: 9,086 / 48,017 × 100 = 18.92%
2013: 8,626 / 46,854 × 100 = 18.41%
PepsiCo's net profit margin increased by 0.72% between 2012 and 2013, reaching 10.15 cents in net profit per dollar of revenue in 2013. Coca-Cola's net profit margin declined by 0.51% over the same period, with the company earning 18.41 cents in net profit per dollar of revenue in 2013. Again, Coca-Cola proved more profitable than PepsiCo on this measure.
Return on assets measures how effectively a company generates income from its assets. It is calculated by dividing net income by total assets.
2012: 6,178 / 74,638 × 100 = 8.28%
2013: 6,740 / 77,478 × 100 = 8.70%
2012: 9,086 / 30,328 × 100 = 29.96%
2013: 8,626 / 31,304 × 100 = 27.56%
PepsiCo's return on assets increased by 0.42% from 2012 to 2013, meaning the company earned 8.70 cents in net income for every dollar of total assets in 2013. Coca-Cola's ROA declined by 2.40% over the same period, yet the company still earned 27.56 cents per dollar of total assets in 2013 — a substantially higher figure than PepsiCo's. This suggests that Coca-Cola is considerably more effective at utilizing its total assets to generate revenue and income.
Taken together, all three profitability ratios indicate that Coca-Cola Company is more profitable than PepsiCo. One way PepsiCo could improve its profitability ratios is by increasing revenue while reducing its cost of goods sold and selling, general, and administrative expenses. Additionally, PepsiCo's management should examine how the company deploys its total assets in order to improve income generation.
Income Statement Analysis
Income statements can be analyzed to compare the financial performance and position of a company — or, in this case, two companies. The first item to consider is revenue. PepsiCo generated $65,429 million in 2012 and $66,415 million in 2013, representing an increase of $986 million. Coca-Cola, by contrast, generated $48,017 million in 2012 and $46,854 million in 2013, representing a revenue decrease of $1,163 million. In comparing the two companies' financial performance, PepsiCo fared better by growing its revenue while Coca-Cola's declined. It is also worth noting that PepsiCo's revenue levels are higher overall, which can be attributed to the company's more diversified product portfolio.
The second key item on the income statement is net income. PepsiCo generated net income of $6,214 million in 2012 and $6,787 million in 2013, an increase of $573 million. Coca-Cola generated $9,019 million in 2012 and $8,584 million in 2013, a decrease of $453 million. While PepsiCo showed a stronger trend with respect to net income growth, Coca-Cola's absolute net income figures remain significantly higher. Notably, despite PepsiCo's higher total revenues, its net income is lower than Coca-Cola's, primarily because PepsiCo incurs substantially greater costs of goods sold as well as higher selling, general, and administrative expenses.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.