This essay examines the major philosophical contributions of five foundational thinkers—David Hume, Aristotle, Spinoza, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill—and explores how their ideas shape contemporary ethical thought. The paper develops a personal ethical philosophy grounded in balance and self-examination, while analyzing key philosophers including Buddha, Freud, Plato, and Jean-Paul Sartre. The work addresses fundamental questions about morality, the existence of God, and the relationship between religion and reason, ultimately arguing that human existence demands rigorous thought and acceptance of fundamental unknowables.
This essay examines the major philosophical contributions of five foundational thinkers who have shaped modern thought: David Hume, Aristotle, Spinoza, Immanuel Kant, and John Stuart Mill. Each philosopher offered distinct approaches to understanding knowledge, morality, and human nature. Their ideas continue to influence contemporary ethics, epistemology, and political philosophy. Additionally, this essay develops a personal ethical philosophy grounded in course readings and explores the existentialist philosophy of Jean-Paul Sartre, whose work represents a pivotal shift in twentieth-century thought toward questions of individual agency and authentic existence.
David Hume had a profound effect on philosophical and political ideas in the modern world. He contributed the philosophy of skepticism, which asks philosophers to question all standards and traditions regarding self and society, including personal identity, religion, politics, and what he termed false cause-and-effect relationships. His skeptical method encourages rigorous examination rather than uncritical acceptance of inherited beliefs.
On the individual level, Hume proposed that there is no fixed self that remains constant throughout one's life. Instead, the individual is a malleable and ever-changing entity shaped by experience and circumstance. This insight challenged the traditional notion of a permanent, essential self and opened new avenues for understanding human identity.
One of his most important and far-reaching philosophies concerned the first purely secular idea of morality. Hume contended that moral acts were conducted by groups and individuals for the rewards they offered, rather than because of any input from divine authority. This naturalistic account of morality grounded ethical behavior in human interests and social utility rather than theological command.
Aristotle profoundly altered the world of philosophy both through his own philosophical contributions and through his design of logic—a systematic line of reasoning that became foundational to Western thought. An early student of Plato, Aristotle founded a highly successful school of philosophy and based his philosophical works on observation as the most fundamental aspect of knowing.
Aristotle believed that everything on earth was in constant movement and that this movement attempted to balance the four elements (earth, water, air, and fire). In contrast, he held that everything in the heavens was fixed and everlasting, reflecting a cosmic hierarchy between the terrestrial and celestial realms. This framework unified terrestrial change with celestial permanence, offering a comprehensive natural philosophy grounded in empirical observation rather than pure speculation.
Spinoza and Lao Tsu were significant contributors to ideals of peace and resolution without violence. Each furthered ideas based on Eastern philosophies that demonstrated the necessity of balance in self and world. Lao Tsu developed the Tao—an Eastern philosophy emphasizing harmony with the natural flow of existence—while Spinoza developed the ideals of Rationalism and other philosophies to strike balance within oneself and thereby in the world.
Spinoza advanced the metaphysical view that the only thing that really exists is God and everything else is a product of that one entity. This monistic philosophy dissolves the dualism between mind and matter, divine and natural, and positions all existence as expressions of a single infinite substance. The convergence between Spinoza's rationalist monism and Lao Tsu's intuitive philosophy of balance reveals how thinkers from different traditions can address similar problems—the need for harmony between the individual and the cosmos.
The center of Immanuel Kant's work revolves around the revolutionary idea that the perception or representation of a concrete object makes the object possible, and not the reverse. This inversion of the typical relationship between mind and world opened the mind to the development of perception and representation as the cementing factor in even the physical world. For Kant, the experience of the physical world becomes more important than the world itself.
Kant believed that science could discover everything through systematic inquiry, and that morality was based upon the observations and rational judgments of the individual or group. His philosophy preserved a role for both empirical knowledge and moral reasoning, grounding ethics not in divine will or utilitarian calculation alone, but in the rational structure of human perception and judgment.
John Stuart Mill influenced nineteenth-century English thought as a skeptic who called into question the validity of social control and unchecked power. He defined the only legitimate reason to control one person by another as a means to prevent them from hurting themselves and others—a principle now known as the harm principle. This framework severely limited justifications for paternalistic intervention in individual liberty.
Mill also believed that actions were right or wrong in proportion to what their outcomes produced—namely, happiness or misery. This consequentialist approach to ethics grounds moral evaluation in results rather than intentions or duties. By combining skepticism toward authority with utilitarian principles, Mill offered a philosophy that respects individual autonomy while maintaining that ethical judgment depends on understanding the consequences of our choices.
The development of philosophy should be regarded as a personal quest for understanding the world and self. If the individual does not examine his or her life and his or her place within the world, then that life lacks value insofar as it does not know its purpose or place. The unexamined life, as philosophers have long held, is not worth living.
As a student of philosophy, I lean toward the balanced explanations offered by Lao Tsu as philosophical groundwork for explaining the need to recognize the whole of existence as a balanced entity, which needs to have such balance restored rather than offset by human action. Though science is a powerful tool, it cannot discover everything by observation or experiment, as there are too many things that are not observable and that create philosophical conflicts. This recognition of the limits of empirical knowledge suggests that some truths are accessed through reflection, intuition, and the integration of experience rather than through scientific method alone.
A mature ethical philosophy must therefore acknowledge both what we can know through reason and observation and what remains fundamentally mysterious. The task of the ethical agent is to cultivate wisdom about when to act decisively and when to accept the limits of human control.
Jean-Paul Sartre contended that individuals create the meanings of their lives through a philosophy he called existentialism. Rather than essence preceding and determining existence, Sartre inverted this relationship: existence precedes essence. Individuals are not born with a predetermined nature or purpose; instead, they must create their own through choices and actions.
Existentialism rejects both rationalism and empiricism in the sense that it holds values to be subjective and ultimately unknowable through logical deduction or sensory experience alone. Individuals are also noted by Sartre to deceive themselves and to avoid confronting the radical freedom and responsibility that existence demands. The only way to discover these lies is to examine the motives and actions associated with morality—to take responsibility for one's choices and to recognize that one cannot hide behind social roles, religious doctrine, or claims of necessity.
"Buddha, Freud, Plato, relativism, Camus, Kierkegaard"
"Morality, God, religion, reason, and personal ideals"
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.