This case study examines how Polaris Industries successfully entered the heavyweight cruiser motorcycle market in 1998 with its Victory brand. Beginning with an overview of the project's origins under Matt Parks, the paper conducts an external situation analysis using Porter's Five Forces, profiles key competitors including Harley-Davidson and Japanese manufacturers, and evaluates Polaris's internal capabilities through value chain analysis. A SWOT analysis identifies the company's core strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. The paper concludes by evaluating three generic business-level strategies — cost leadership, differentiation, and market focus — ultimately arguing that differentiation is the most appropriate strategy for Polaris given the preferences of its target market.
This is a case study of Polaris Industries and how the company managed to enter the motorcycle market in 1998 with the Victory brand. The effort was led by Matt Parks, who joined the company in 1987 and was asked to conduct research on the viability of Polaris entering the motorcycle market (Hitt, Ireland, & Hoskisson, 2016). The name "Victory" was coined while the company was still exploring the possibility of starting motorcycle production — it served as a confidential codename for the project, and it was Parks who came up with the name.
Research indicated that there was room for another competitor to enter the market, particularly in the cruiser segment, which was then dominated by Japanese producers and Harley-Davidson. Leveraging its existing manufacturing capabilities, Polaris began developing a prototype for the Victory cruiser under the leadership of Geoff Burgess. The team analyzed various cruisers on the market and developed a unique motorcycle suited to American riders. Polaris chose to design its own engine to ensure it would not compromise on performance, while also making use of outsourcing for certain components.
The Victory became a reality on February 19, 1997, when the company made its public announcement, and the first bike rolled off the production line on July 4, 1998. As the Victory motorcycle line progressed, Polaris went on to acquire companies including Indian Motorcycles and Brammo — both acquisitions aimed at strengthening the motorcycle division. Polaris opted to limit Victory motorcycle sales to its own dealerships, though this decision raised questions about whether the exclusive distribution model was helping or hindering the company's overall sales performance.
Polaris began by conducting research to establish the viability of entering the motorcycle market and to identify its potential customers. The target customer was identified as the "comeback rider" — individuals who had established careers, raised children, and taken on mortgages, and who were returning to motorcycling. Polaris was not targeting the youth market. With the Victory motorcycle, Polaris aimed to offer American riders an alternative American-made motorcycle alongside Harley-Davidson, which aligned with many riders' preferences for domestic brands. As an American company itself, Polaris was well positioned to capitalize on this sentiment.
Polaris hired experienced personnel to lead engine development and motorcycle design, providing a technological advantage over rivals. Outsourcing select components allowed the company to source the highest quality parts available. The Victory's price point was positioned below that of key rivals, creating economic opportunity and the potential to increase sales volume. The company also identified the global market as a longer-term expansion target.
Applying Porter's Five Forces framework (Porter, 2008), the threat of new entrants into the American motorcycle market is relatively high, given the number of international manufacturers seeking access to U.S. consumers. The threat of substitutes is low, as the target market consists of experienced, mature riders with a strong preference for American-made motorcycles. Customers hold meaningful bargaining power, which is reflected in the competitive price point selected for the Victory. Suppliers, by contrast, hold little bargaining power due to the abundance of component suppliers within the industry. Finally, industry rivalry, while present, is not excessively intense — competitors tend to focus on differentiating their own products rather than engaging in direct price wars, making pricing the primary differentiating factor among competitors.
The key competitors within the industry include Japanese manufacturers, Harley-Davidson, Excelsior-Henderson, BMW, and Big Dog. Japanese manufacturers hold large overall sales figures due to their diversified product lines, making them formidable competitors who continued to dominate the market even after Victory's entry.
Harley-Davidson offers a wide variety of products and has long been considered the aspirational motorcycle brand for American riders. Its high-quality bikes command premium prices; however, rising demand eventually outpaced the company's production capacity, forcing customers to wait more than a year for delivery. This constraint hurt sales and created an opening for competitors.
"Polaris capabilities, value chain, and strategic strengths"
"Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats summary"
"Evaluation of generic strategies and differentiation recommendation"
You’re 42% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.