This paper addresses six core questions in marriage and family counseling, examining why preventive therapy approaches have not significantly reduced divorce rates, describing integrative behavioral couple therapy, and explaining how therapists handle infidelity and divorce. It also compares psychodynamic and Bowen family therapy, detailing the premises, techniques, and therapist roles associated with each approach. The paper highlights key similarities and differences between these two influential frameworks, particularly regarding the origins of family dysfunction, the role of anxiety, and whether therapeutic change is directed at the individual or the broader family system.
There are several reasons for the overall ineffective nature of preventative therapies when attempting to decrease the divorce rate. Primarily, there are inherent biases that exist in a therapy session, such as confirmation bias, where the interviewer may seek to elicit responses that confirm his or her hypothesis. There are also self-fulfilling prophecies that cause clients to alter their thoughts or actions to align with the expectations of the interviewer. Many clients are also less motivated than others, which may lead them to provide inaccurate or false responses. All of these issues can contribute to the therapy being less effective than it could be.
Integrative behavioral couple therapy consists of two separate phases: the evaluation and feedback stage, and the active treatment phase. During the first phase, the therapist attempts to discover why the couple has sought therapy and obtains a brief history of the relationship. The couple actively participates in the feedback process during this phase. Once the couple has agreed that the chosen therapy seems right for them, the treatment phase formally begins. This phase involves the therapist opening lines of communication and teaching the couple alternative ways of interacting with one another.
The approach used by the therapist depends upon the specific therapeutic model that has been chosen. However, regardless of the approach, the basic methods still include clarifying and examining the issues that led to the affair and then addressing the problems that are uncovered. The therapist must refrain from judging the person who has had an affair or is considering divorce, and must not sway the couple in either direction. Honesty and the avoidance of secrecy must be encouraged at all times.
Rather than focusing on a specific individual, psychodynamic family therapy involves the group as a whole and tries to change the environment in which each individual exists in order to benefit the entire family unit. This means that understanding and communication among individual members must be improved to prevent the family from using one particular member as a scapegoat for the entire family's problems. Problems are generally understood to derive from issues rooted in a previous generation within the family. One of the most important tools available to the therapist is transferential interpretation made among family members, which can help illuminate intergenerational problems and patterns.
"Anxiety reduction through differentiation and self-change"
"Similarities and differences between two family therapy models"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.