Princess Mononoke: Is Killing Justified in Self-Defense?
This essay examines the opening scene of Hayao Miyazaki's Princess Mononoke to evaluate the moral claim that killing can be justified in defense of one's community. Focusing on Ashitaka's confrontation with the demonic boar god, the paper argues that lethal force is ethically permissible only as a last resort, after all peaceful alternatives have been exhausted. The analysis highlights Ashitaka's decision to reason with the creature before drawing his weapon as a moral prerequisite to justified killing. The essay further notes that the film portrays consequences for Ashitaka's action, underscoring that even justified killing carries a moral cost and ripple effects that must be acknowledged.
- Introduction: Thesis and film context introduced
- Scene Summary: Ashitaka and the Demonic Monster: Detailed retelling of the opening scene
- Reasoning First: The Moral Foundation of the Scene: Ashitaka reasons before resorting to violence
- Killing as a Last Resort: Supporting the Thesis: Conditions under which the thesis is justified
- Consequences and Caution: Ashitaka bears consequences for killing
- Conclusion: Killing justified only after all else fails
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its ethical argument in a specific, clearly described scene rather than making vague claims about the film as a whole, giving the analysis concrete evidence to work with.
- It acknowledges the complexity of the thesis by introducing an important prerequisite — that reasoning must come before lethal action — rather than asserting a blanket endorsement of killing.
- The paper connects the fictional scenario to real-life moral reasoning, broadening its relevance beyond film analysis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses close reading of a single scene as the primary method of argument. By walking through Ashitaka's sequential decisions — reasoning, pleading, and only then shooting — the student builds a layered ethical claim: justified killing requires the exhaustion of non-lethal alternatives. This technique of reading narrative action as moral evidence is central to applied ethics and humanities writing.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a thesis statement and context, then provides a detailed scene summary, followed by thematic analysis of Ashitaka's moral reasoning and the conditions under which the killing is justified. It closes by acknowledging consequences and limitations of the thesis before delivering a brief, reaffirming conclusion. The structure is linear and argument-driven, appropriate for a short analytical essay at the high school or early undergraduate level.
Introduction
Princess Mononoke (1997), directed by Hayao Miyazaki, is staged around the lives of two main characters and their journeys of reflection on their actions: Princess Mononoke (also known as San) and Ashitaka. The thesis explored in this essay is that it is justified to kill in order to defend your community. While many scenes in the film speak to arguments for and against this claim, the scene chosen for analysis occurs at the very beginning of the movie and forms the foundation for the journey that Ashitaka, one of the film's key characters, thereafter undertakes.
Scene Summary: Ashitaka and the Demonic Monster
In the opening scene, we see Ashitaka riding his elk ahead of a demonic monster. Ashitaka appears to be reasoning with the creature, urging it to stop chasing him and leave him in peace. The monster, however, spots the village that Ashitaka belongs to and turns in that direction. Three youngsters — one of whom we later discover to be Ashitaka's sister — are also in the path of the rerouting monster.
For the first time in the scene, Ashitaka draws his weapon — a bow and arrow — while still attempting to reason with the monster and pleading with it to leave his village alone. Receiving no response to his pleas, Ashitaka fires an arrow into one of the monster's eyes in an attempt to defend his village. The monster retaliates and seizes Ashitaka's arm. Finding an opening to fire once more, Ashitaka shoots at the monster's eye again, and this time the shot proves fatal. The scene closes as the monster dissipates and loses all its power.
Reasoning First: The Moral Foundation of the Scene
The most striking aspect of this scene is that Ashitaka, as a defender of his village, tries to reason with the creature first — despite his fear of its unknown nature. This approach reveals the strength of his character even in a far-from-ideal situation. It also serves as a prelude to the central argument: reasoning should be the first step before any extreme action is justified. What this further suggests is that Ashitaka chose to kill only as a means of defense — as a last resort — after reasoning and pleading had failed to make any progress.
The concept of exhausting peaceful alternatives before resorting to lethal force is a cornerstone of many just war and self-defense frameworks, and Miyazaki's storytelling subtly embeds this principle in Ashitaka's moral conduct.
Conclusion
In conclusion, it is safe to say that in the line of defense, when all other methods have failed, an extreme action like killing can be one of the methods justified for the greater good. Princess Mononoke illustrates this principle through Ashitaka's opening confrontation, demonstrating that justified killing is inseparable from the moral effort to avoid it — and from an honest reckoning with its aftermath.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.