This paper examines how a quantitative research design can be applied to the problem of elder abuse, neglect, and exploitation among older persons in rural American communities. The author outlines a pretest/posttest intervention study involving approximately 50 healthcare providers—including emergency nurses, public health nurses, and home health staff—to evaluate the effectiveness of a structured training curriculum on recognizing and reporting elder abuse. The paper discusses the advantages and limitations of quantitative methodology in this context, acknowledges gaps in current reporting practices, and proposes that findings could inform advocacy efforts and community resource development in low-access rural healthcare environments.
A quantitative research method is any research method or design that relies on numerical findings, data analysis using those findings, and an interpretation of that data. Examples of quantitative research include observation of the number of occurrences and questionnaires with numerically rated responses to specific questions. The quantitative method is considered non-subjective and relies on data analysis to support a stated hypothesis. Data materials are quantifiable, and observational data can be quantified to create a picture of the phenomena or hypothesis being studied without being obtrusive to participants (Trochim, 2001, pp. 152–167). There are many reasons to utilize a quantitative research design, the most important of which is gaining a specific, individual understanding of the phenomena observed within a hypothesis (Poggenpoel & Myburgh, 2005, p. 304).
In applying the quantitative method to the issue of barriers to effectively recognizing, reporting, and responding to the needs of older persons who are abused, neglected, and exploited in rural America, this researcher would employ observation and quantitative measurement to test outcomes of a pretest/posttest intervention scenario. The intervention would provide first responders and primary care staff with a structured system to effectively recognize, report, and respond to the needs of abused, neglected, and exploited older persons in rural communities.
The pretest would be interview-based and would include questions about the number of suspected cases seen and the number of cases reported for follow-up by law enforcement and/or public health referral. Participants (n = 50) would include local emergency care nurses and other providers, public health nurses, and home health care nurses. The questions would vary among different healthcare team members depending on the area of healthcare delivery they provide. Healthcare providers would be best positioned to answer questions about perceptions of risk factors, as well as what policies, procedures, laws, regulations, reporting standards, and community resources would be needed to mitigate or prevent occurrences (Day, 2007, p. 169).
The pretest/posttest intervention interview method was chosen to provide a clear assessment of the usefulness of a curriculum involving recognition, identification, and formal intervention regarding elder abuse and neglect. The goal is to determine whether such an intervention would assist more individuals in harm's way than current ad hoc responses to suspicion of abuse. The training system would also include several reporting tools, including an abuse questionnaire offered to those perceived to be at risk. This questionnaire would be incorporated as part of the health interview and administered to patients who present in care settings, along with a system of follow-up responses, contacts, and alternatives associated with each identified event. As noted in the literature, "although physicians and nurses are best positioned to recognize and diagnose cases of elder abuse, the level of reporting these cases is much lower than its true incidence" (Almogue, Weiss, Marcus & Beloosesky, 2010, p. 86).
Elder abuse in rural settings is compounded by limited access to healthcare infrastructure, geographic isolation, and reduced availability of social services, all of which make systematic intervention strategies especially important.
"Acknowledges scope and methodological constraints"
"Projects outcomes and community policy applications"
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.