Should Rapid Response Teams Operate in Outpatient Clinics?
This paper examines the feasibility of developing a rapid response team (RRT) protocol for outpatient clinical settings, including urgent care and walk-in centers. As demand for outpatient services grows following the Affordable Care Act, ensuring patient safety for those who may experience unexpected emergent conditions becomes increasingly important. The paper reviews established RRT protocols from the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, originally designed for hospital emergency departments, and evaluates their applicability to outpatient environments. It concludes that, with minor modifications, existing hospital-based RRT protocols can be meaningfully adapted to outpatient settings, though the practical need for such protocols warrants further investigation.
- Introduction: The Rise of Outpatient Care: Growth of outpatient centers and demand drivers
- The Case for Rapid Response Protocols in Outpatient Settings: Gap in RRT protocols for outpatient clinics
- Existing Rapid Response Team Protocols: ICSI hospital RRT protocol table and objectives
- Adapting Hospital RRT Protocols to Outpatient Settings: Modifying hospital objectives for outpatient use
- Conclusion: RRT adaptation feasible; need still uncertain
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in concrete industry data — citing approximately 7,100 outpatient centers — giving the reader an immediate sense of scale and relevance.
- It makes disciplined use of an authoritative protocol table (adapted from the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement) to anchor its analytical claims, rather than relying solely on prose assertion.
- The argument is tightly scoped: the author identifies exactly one inapplicable protocol item from the hospital RRT framework and proposes a specific reword, demonstrating close textual reasoning.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied policy analysis — taking an established clinical framework (hospital RRT protocol) and systematically evaluating its transferability to a new context (outpatient settings). This technique involves identifying structural parallels, isolating points of divergence, and proposing targeted modifications rather than wholesale redesign. The use of a structured protocol table as primary evidence is an effective way to make abstract procedural content legible and arguable.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with industry context establishing why outpatient care matters, then narrows to the specific gap: absence of RRT protocols in outpatient settings. A detailed protocol table occupies the middle section, followed by a brief but focused analysis showing that existing hospital objectives and procedures require only minor language changes to apply in outpatient environments. The conclusion is implicit rather than separately headed, folded into the final analytical paragraph.
Introduction: The Rise of Outpatient Care
Today, there are approximately 7,100 outpatient centers — also known as urgent care centers, immediate care centers, walk-in care centers, and similar facilities — that compete for patients in need of medical care (Size of industry, 2015). Outpatient care has assumed a new level of importance in the American healthcare infrastructure following the passage of the Affordable Care Act, as well as in response to the changing needs of the American population for health care services that demand more efficient, community-based resources (Ferenc, 2013). For instance, Brandenburg and Gabow (2015) emphasize that, "While excellent clinical care remains the expectation, health care consumers are now seeking health care and supporting systems that are respectful of individuals" (p. 3). Respecting individuals, of course, also means respecting their time, but anecdotal accounts and studies to date confirm that patients are kept waiting longer than necessary for a variety of reasons, all of which relate to an apparent lack of concern for patient welfare (Ferenc, 2013).
According to John Kouletsis, vice president of planning and design for Kaiser Permanente, the move toward the provision of outpatient services actually began several years ago, but it has intensified as hospital emergency rooms have become notoriously overcrowded. Kouletsis emphasizes that, "The primary drivers for many years have to do with ease of access, meeting expectations of the patients and their families, to offer high quality care. There's a huge move to providing care in the outpatient world" (cited in Ferenc, 2013, p. 22). In fact, the demand for outpatient clinic services has increased to the point where health care providers are contemplating transforming shipping containers into low-cost clinics that can be deployed quickly into communities in need — in the same manner these containers are being transformed into modern housing units (Ferenc, 2013).
There have been some attempts to improve the efficiency of outpatient clinics in recent years. For instance, Hamrock and Hopkins (2013) report that, "Some models of outpatient clinics aim to improve patient flow, reduce wait times, maximize staff utilization, and accomplish other gains in efficiency. These outpatient models are tested through changes to patient scheduling, patient routing, and internal work processes" (p. 111).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.