This paper examines strategies for recruiting and retaining talent during a major organizational change — specifically, a corporate merger with a three-month preparation window. The paper outlines a leadership guide covering three core areas: the planning phase, leadership style, and tactical considerations. It introduces Weisbord's Six Box Model as a diagnostic tool for understanding organizational culture, identifies transformational leadership — including Bass's four components — as an effective style for managing change, and addresses the tactical challenges of knowledge transfer and employee training. Together, these elements form a framework for minimizing resistance and maximizing retention throughout a merger transition.
The paper demonstrates effective applied synthesis — taking established academic models (Weisbord's Six Box Model, Bass's transformational leadership components) and applying them to a real-world organizational scenario. Rather than simply describing the theories, the author explains how each model informs specific decisions a leader should make before, during, and after the merger.
The paper opens by framing the scenario and its constraints, then moves through four logical phases: (1) Planning, which covers culture assessment and organizational diagnosis; (2) Leadership, which reviews transformational leadership theory and Bass's four components; (3) Tactical Considerations, addressing knowledge transfer and skills gap analysis; and (4) a Conclusion that synthesizes the three phases into a unified transition strategy. This structure mirrors a real organizational change management plan.
The scenario addressed in this paper represents one of the more extreme examples of organizational change — a corporate merger. However, with three months available to prepare, there is a meaningful window for planning and facilitating the transition. This analysis creates a guide for meeting the objectives of employee retention throughout the merger. There will undoubtedly be a great deal of employee resistance to change that manifests as soon as news of the merger breaks.
The leader will need to have all available information prepared, including the change's impact on each individual's position, job requirements, and compensation, among other factors. The leader will also need to have an intimate knowledge of the new organization and its culture, serve as a source of inspiration, provide a vision for both individuals and the collective organization, and navigate many tactical objectives along the way.
The planning phase will be one of the most vital stages in managing organizational change. The leader needs to fully understand the changes to the organization — and to the individuals who constitute it — before crafting any leadership strategy. The leader also needs to understand the new organization's structure and culture in order to envision what an ideal outcome might look like. During periods of organizational change, leadership is essential to providing the guidance needed to overcome employees' natural resistance. However, the leader must have an effective plan and be able to communicate it in the form of a compelling vision.
Beyond the details of the employees' contractual agreements in the merger — which will be of vital interest to current employees — there is also a need to understand the organizational culture of the new entity so that employees know what to expect in the new environment. There will undoubtedly be some cultural changes accompanying the merger that will require adjustment by the organization. Culture is a broad term representing a concept of shared beliefs and values found within an organizational setting.
Although organizational culture can be relatively abstract, there are models that can help make this information more tangible. For example, Weisbord's Six Box Model is used in organizational diagnosis to structure investigation and data collection into six categories: purposes, structure, relationships, rewards, leadership, and helpful mechanisms (Paine, 2008). Each of these categories can be identified from an internal perspective — such as employees or management — or from an external source such as customers, clients, or vendors. Once the source of dissatisfaction is determined and identified, it becomes possible to take corrective action. However, this model does not take a fully holistic approach to items such as a gap analysis. Nevertheless, these categories provide a useful way to rate and understand an organization, and applying the model to the new organization before the merger would give existing employees a clearer sense of what to expect before the transition is made.
Leadership is the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals. The organizational objective is already set by the merger; however, the vision will be up to leadership to supply. A brief literature review was conducted to identify leadership styles that have proven effective during periods of organizational change. The transformational leadership model is one that has demonstrated consistent effectiveness, especially during periods of significant organizational change. The transformational leader is known for the ability to set a vision and inspire employees to work toward organizational objectives.
One definition of transformational leadership describes it as a leader's ability to inspire organizational members to move beyond their immediate self-interests (Bass, 1985). A transformational leader can be recognized by their capacity to create inspirational visions among team members — visions that affect employees in such a way that they aspire to reach their full potential (Judge & Bono, 2000). One way a transformational leader can create this type of motivation is by setting challenging expectations that stimulate employees and lead them to pursue higher levels of performance (Bass, 1999). While there are many ways to motivate employees, the transformational leader does so through means beyond compensation alone.
Bass (1985) identified four main components of transformational leadership. The first is idealized influence, which refers to a leader's ability to maintain an idealized perception among subordinates. The leader must be perceived as having a strong sense of dedication, purpose, and perseverance. If the leader does not convey a strong sense of purpose, their vision will likely be unreceptive or fail to motivate others. This concept can be captured by the adage, "lead by example."
The second component is inspirational motivation, which refers to a leader's ability to articulate an inspiring organizational vision that displays enthusiasm, optimism, and commitment to goals. This generally requires strong interpersonal skills and the ability to communicate effectively with groups. It represents more of the delivery method, while the third component — intellectual stimulation — represents more of the content of what is being communicated. Intellectual stimulation refers to a leader's ability to encourage followers to actively question assumptions and seek creative solutions to organizational problems.
The fourth component is individualized consideration, which regards the leader's ability to give personalized attention to team members. This will likely be one of the most important aspects of leadership throughout this organizational change, as employees will likely feel anxious about what the merger means for them individually. Personalized attention will be necessary to address their specific questions and concerns. These four components should be kept in mind before, during, and after the merger.
The scenario represents one of the more extreme examples of organizational change. However, there are three months to prepare, which provides for some level of planning and facilitation for the change. Beyond the details of the employees' contractual agreements in the merger — which will be of vital interest to current employees — there is also a need to understand the organizational culture of the new entity so that employees know what to expect in the new environment. Weisbord's Six Box Model was presented as an example of the cultural and organizational factors that should be considered during the transition.
Transformational leadership was also identified as a model well suited to facilitating the transition. Leadership is the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals, and transformational leadership adds a motivational dimension to this definition. Bass's (1985) four components — idealized influence, inspirational motivation, intellectual stimulation, and individualized consideration — are all relevant to leading an organization through a period of significant organizational change.
Two tactical considerations were also identified. The first involves taking stock of the knowledge base present in the current organization and ensuring it is effectively transferred to the new entity. The second involves identifying the gap between existing employee knowledge and the knowledge required in the new organization, and using that gap as the foundation for a training program. Any skills employees need to adapt to their new roles should ideally be developed before the transition takes place.
Argote, L., & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 150–169.
Bass, B. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
Bass, B. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9–32.
Everyone A Leader. (2009, August). Organizational development models. Retrieved from http://everyonealeader.blogspot.com/2009/08/organizational-development-models.html
Judge, J., & Bono, J. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 751–765.
Paine, V. (2008). Organizational change: A comprehensive reader (1st ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.