Reeve and Hanks Speeches: Rhetorical Appeals Compared
This paper compares the rhetorical strategies employed by Christopher Reeve in his 1996 Democratic National Convention address and Tom Hanks in his 2005 college commencement speech. Despite the differences in audience, occasion, and specific focus, both speakers use emotional appeals, humor, and statistics to motivate their listeners toward action. The paper examines how each speaker personalizes and universalizes his central message, how they construct their theses, and how they tailor their appeals to the particular hopes and capacities of their respective audiences. The analysis highlights how rhetorical choices reflect the speaker's awareness of audience and purpose.
- Introduction: Two Speeches, Two Contexts: Key differences in audience, occasion, and decade
- Opening Strategies and Emotional Appeals: Humor, family metaphor, and emotional hooks
- The Use of Statistics and the Central Thesis: Parallel statistics and thesis construction
- Personalizing and Universalizing the Message: How each speaker connects personal and societal stakes
- Audience-Specific Outcomes and Calls to Action: Tailored appeals and practical calls for help
- Conclusion: Power, Hope, and Practical Action: Shared inspirational foundation in both speeches
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear comparative structure throughout, consistently returning to both speakers rather than treating them as separate isolated analyses.
- It grounds abstract rhetorical concepts — such as personalization and universalization — in specific quoted evidence from each speech, giving the argument concrete support.
- The paper draws an insightful parallel between the two speakers' statistics (one in five versus four percent), demonstrating close reading and analytical depth.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of parallel comparative analysis: each rhetorical element — opening humor, statistical appeal, thesis construction, emotional appeal, and call to action — is examined in both speeches before the paper moves to the next element. This structure ensures that comparison is substantive rather than sequential, and it prevents the essay from drifting into two separate summaries.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing contextual differences between the two speeches (audience, occasion, decade). It then moves through rhetorical strategy in roughly chronological order — opening, thesis, emotional appeals, audience targeting — before concluding with a synthesis of how both speakers use a sense of power and hope to motivate action. The conclusion is brief but ties both arguments together thematically.
Introduction: Two Speeches, Two Contexts
There are some key differences easily identified in the speeches made by Christopher Reeve and Tom Hanks. Most obviously, they are presented nearly a decade apart, with Reeve's speech occurring in 1996 and Hanks' in 2005. They are also given to widely different audiences: Reeve addresses the National Democratic Convention, while Hanks speaks to a college graduating class. Both actors, however, make a strongly emotional appeal to their audiences for help. Hanks focuses on the future potential of his audience to provide help in a very general sense, while Reeve specifically focuses on the current power of his audience to make a difference in the lives of the disabled.
References
Hanks, Tom. "The Power of Four." Poughkeepsie, 22 May 2005. American Rhetoric. Ed. Michael E. Eidenmuller. 2006. 26 Sept. 2006.
Reeve, Christopher. "1996 Democratic National Convention Address." Chicago, 26 Aug. 1996. American Rhetoric. Ed. Michael E. Eidenmuller. 2006. 26 Sept. 2006.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.