Remedial English vs. Regular College Courses: A Comparison
This essay compares the experiences of students enrolled in remedial English with those in a regular college course, drawing on Eric Hoover and Sara Lipka's article "The Second-Chance Club: Inside a Semester of Remedial English." The author examines key differences — including credit status, classroom behavior, and the personal hardships many remedial students have faced — while also identifying a shared motivation to learn and improve. The essay ultimately argues that despite surface-level differences in preparation and circumstance, all students pursuing education are united by the same fundamental goal: to build better futures for themselves.
- Introduction: Two Very Different Classrooms: Introduces source article and thesis comparing classes
- Credit, Behavior, and Classroom Standards: Contrasts credit status and student conduct
- Personal Hardships and Educational Background: Examines differing student backgrounds and life obstacles
- A Shared Commitment to Learning: Identifies shared motivation across both class types
- Conclusion: The Universal Value of Education: Argues education unites all students regardless of path
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The author grounds abstract comparisons in specific textual evidence, quoting directly from Hoover and Lipka's article to support each claim rather than relying solely on personal opinion.
- The essay maintains an honest, reflective tone — acknowledging privilege and challenging initial assumptions, particularly when discussing student Dominique Parrish's background.
- The conclusion ties both threads together with a unifying argument, showing that comparison essays need not end in judgment but can arrive at shared understanding.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the compare-and-contrast technique applied to a personal and textual subject simultaneously. The author moves between first-person observation and third-party source evidence in each body paragraph, using transitions to signal shifts between the two contexts. This dual-lens approach gives the argument both credibility and personal authenticity.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a framing introduction that introduces the source article and states the thesis. Three body paragraphs each address a distinct point of comparison: credit and classroom conduct, student backgrounds and hardship, and shared motivation to succeed. The conclusion synthesizes the comparison into a broader reflection on the universal importance of education. The structure is clean and follows a classic five-paragraph essay format suited to undergraduate composition.
Introduction: Two Very Different Classrooms
School can be either a very uplifting and inspirational place or a daunting place that serves to discourage the student. As someone on the verge of completing a college education and receiving a degree, it is easy to overlook how difficult that path has been for others. Some people have encountered obstacles in life that have prevented them from moving in a straight line through education, forcing them to complete what may feel like unnecessary tasks just to prove their academic aspirations.
In "The Second-Chance Club: Inside a Semester of Remedial English," authors Eric Hoover and Sara Lipka write about a class of students required to take remedial English who are not particularly pleased about having to do so. There are many differences between a regular college course and remedial English, but there are also meaningful similarities. A regular credit-bearing course tends to motivate students differently; the students in the remedial class often face more significant external problems that can hinder their performance. Yet what both groups share is this: by taking the class, they are working to improve themselves and preparing for future success.
Works Cited
Hoover, Eric, and Sara Lipka. "The Second-Chance Club: Inside a Semester of Remedial English." The Chronicle of Higher Education. Washington, D.C.: Chronicle of Higher Education, 2013. Print.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.