This review examines Robert Sapolsky's A Primate's Memoir (2002), a blend of autobiography and scientific narrative recounting his two decades of fieldwork with baboons in southwestern Kenya. The paper traces Sapolsky's lifelong fascination with primates, his surprising findings about testosterone, stress, and social dominance, and the practical and emotional challenges of conducting animal behavior research. It also considers his nuanced portrait of Africa — marked by corruption, tribal conflict, and political instability — and reflects on the paradox of a scientist who must maintain clinical distance while deeply loving the creatures he studies.
The title of Robert Sapolsky's A Primate's Memoir is a kind of playful joke. On one hand, the author — a neuroscientist and animal behaviorist — is himself a primate, hence the autobiographical framing. On the other hand, his book is also the tale of the primates he became acquainted with during his studies. Because of his passion for baboons, Sapolsky's fortunes became intimately tied to a group of the species, to the point where he became an accepted, if lower-ranking, member of their tribe.
Sapolsky spent more than twenty years in southwestern Kenya, living and working with baboons. Four months out of every year were spent observing the parallels and distinctions between human and baboon behavior. He had little financial support from his university, lived on canned sardines and spaghetti, and when he was not physically threatened by the baboons, he found himself confronted with the dangers of politicians, bureaucrats, and charlatans in a land where life is cheap.
Even so, this was the culminating effort of a lifetime dream that had begun when the author was a boy, staring at images of primates in the Museum of Natural History and wishing that he could be one of them. "I had never planned to become a savanna baboon," begins Sapolsky's memoir (Sapolsky 3). He wanted to be a different kind of ape: "You make compromises in life; not every kid can grow up to become president or a baseball star or a mountain gorilla. So I made plans to join the baboon troop" (Sapolsky 4). Actually living among baboons taught Sapolsky the difference between himself and his beloved creatures very quickly, but only increased his fascination.
Sapolsky notes his early enthusiasm not simply to be amusing, or to mark the origins of his passionate interest in primates, but also to underline the similarities between humans and apes. Just like humans, apes appear to have their leaders, followers — and misfits. "Still just emerging from my own festering adolescent insecurities, I had a difficult time not identifying utterly with Benjamin and his foibles… [Benjamin] stumbled over his feet a lot, always sat on the stinging ants… He didn't have a chance with the females, and if anyone on earth had lost a fight and was in a bad mood, Benjamin would invariably be the one stumbling onto the scene at the worst possible moment" (Sapolsky 10).
Apes are animals, yet seem intriguingly similar to ourselves because of their closeness in the history of our evolution as a species. By studying the baboons, Sapolsky learns a great deal about himself and about human life — and, in particular, about the human response to stress and stress hormones.
Much to his surprise, Sapolsky finds that the assumption linking testosterone and aggression to social dominance does not hold, according to his research findings. Instead, lower-ranking males often had the highest testosterone levels and exhibited the highest levels of stress: they are the "jerky" adolescent males of the group (Sapolsky 167). Dominant baboons — the most confident members of the tribe — are the least stress-prone. In short, the alphas of the group are cool, assured leaders who are able to relax about their place in the hierarchy.
"Tension between emotional attachment and scientific distance"
"Corruption, conflict, and Kenyan politics as backdrop"
Despite his love for the creatures he studies, Sapolsky is not a sentimentalist about Africa. He portrays a world of local corruption, bureaucracy, civil strife, and tribal warfare. Negotiating local politics while performing scientific observation is not something primatologists train for. This struggle between African human civilization and the rights of animals eventually took Dian Fossey's life in Rwanda (Sapolsky 223). Although Sapolsky navigates this minefield with greater diplomacy than Fossey, in his estimation the rituals of the native warrior peoples and the mire of Kenyan politics seem as strange — if not stranger — than the society of baboons, who also show both compassion and violence toward one another.
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.