This paper reviews Eric Schlosser's Fast Food Nation (2002), tracing the rise of fast-food culture in America from the 1950s onward and evaluating the book's central arguments. The review covers Schlosser's critiques of predatory marketing to children, labor exploitation of low-wage and immigrant workers, the decline of small farms and ranches, dangerous conditions in meat and poultry processing plants, and the global spread of obesity. The reviewer also examines the book's political dimensions, including corporate lobbying and regulatory failures, before offering personal policy recommendations and assessing Schlosser's cautiously optimistic conclusion about the industry's future.
The paper exemplifies evaluative summarization: the writer does not merely restate Schlosser's arguments but consistently layers in personal judgment — agreeing with some claims, questioning others, and extending the discussion with original policy proposals. This two-track approach (what the book says / what the reviewer thinks) is the hallmark of an effective critical book review.
The review opens with a thematic introduction situating fast food in postwar American history, then works through Schlosser's arguments roughly in the order they appear in the book. The middle sections cover marketing, labor, and agriculture. The final sections shift toward the reviewer's own political and policy commentary before closing with Schlosser's optimistic ending. This structure mirrors the source text while still allowing space for original analysis.
"Fast Food Nation is the kind of book that you hope young people read because it demonstrates far better than any social studies class the need for government regulation, the unchecked power of multinational corporations, and the importance of our everyday decisions." — USA Today
Despite international concerns with the Cold War and Senator McCarthy's accusations, the 1950s brought exciting change for many Americans. Large numbers headed out to the suburbs and into newly designed housing. National roads began sweeping across cities and towns. Soon, another change appeared along these roads: the arrival of fast-food restaurants, which have epitomized America ever since. People simply drive up to the window and order their meals; within minutes they are fed and content. Yet there are always two sides to an issue, especially when big money is involved. According to Fast Food Nation by Eric Schlosser, fast-food chains have caused as much damage as they have added to American culture.
In Fast Food Nation, Schlosser raises several major problems with the fast-food industry: the exploitation of poor and unskilled workers in factories and restaurants, questionable meat preparation practices, the loss of small private farms and ranches, and rising obesity rates. Since the book's publication in 2002, a number of restaurants have begun offering "healthier" choices with less fat and fewer carbohydrates, and Western countries are starting to recognize the obesity problem. However, most of the issues the author identifies persist.
According to Schlosser, fast service is only one of several marketing innovations that McDonald's has introduced over the years — ideas that have since become staples of Advertising 101. One is the use of the logo or brand: the sight of the golden arches alone instills cravings for greasy fries and hamburgers in fast-food regulars. Another marketing tactic is the use of toys as giveaways in Happy Meals. The concept of "synergy" — when two companies such as McDonald's and Disney team up to promote the latest movie character in commercials — has also become standard practice. Today, marketers begin this synergistic process even earlier: toys and giveaways appear on shelves before the film is even released, and children are begging for the products months before opening day.
Marketing to children has become big business, with parent groups and government agencies fighting an endless battle against creeping commercialism. Companies will reach young consumers by any means available. Some businesses, for example, place their product names on free educational programs, award giveaways to top students, and donate sports equipment to schools. The school systems receive much-needed materials — but at what cost? Does such support also encourage the consumption of unhealthy food and beverages, discourage individuality, and significantly bias children's purchasing decisions?
It is true that fast-food restaurants have made it easy to grab a quick meal. However, there are trade-offs. Franchises have multiplied so extensively over the past several decades that it is difficult to find any major city without a strip of these establishments along the main drag. As Fast Food Nation states: "The fast food chains feed off the sprawl of Colorado Springs, accelerate it, and help set its visual tone. They build large signs to attract motorists and look at cars the way predators view prey." St. Louis exemplifies this problem. Sprawl is rapidly consuming choice farmland and open space. According to the American Farmland Trust, the five counties surrounding St. Louis lost over 170,000 acres between 1981 and 1996 — nearly one-third of all developed farmland lost statewide during that period.
As its name implies, another defining concept of the fast-food industry is speed. American manufacturers follow an idea conceived in the early twentieth century for mass production: "throughput," meaning the speed and volume of flow through a system. It is the ability to increase the pace of assembly — making more products by making things move faster. By this measure, throughput is a more crucial metric than the number of workers employed or the value of machinery used.
Fast-food restaurants epitomize throughput. Across the United States, adolescents and young adults work early hours before school and again after classes in exchange for low wages and little or no benefits. While on the job, they are expected to serve customers quickly and efficiently. Coffee breaks and downtime are nearly nonexistent.
Young people are not the only employees exploited. Other individuals in the lower socioeconomic class — including immigrants, the chronically unemployed, and seniors — will accept minimum wage out of necessity. These workers are the first to bear the brunt of difficult conditions, yet they are typically the last to advocate for better treatment or speak out against unethical practices, because they have so much to lose.
You’re 40% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.