Scotland PA: Shakespeare's Macbeth as Dark Comedy
This paper examines Billy Morrissette's 2001 film Scotland PA as a dark comedy adaptation of Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Macbeth. Set in 1970s small-town America, the film transplants the play's characters and plot into a diner setting, replacing witches with stoners, a warrior king with a diner employee, and tragic grandeur with low-brow humor. The paper compares the film's comedic approach to Aristotle's definition of tragedy, analyzes key scenes and cinematic techniques, and argues that while the adaptation succeeds as comedy, it sacrifices the moral weight, cathartic power, and tragic darkness that define Shakespeare's original play.
- Introduction: Transplanting Macbeth to 1970s America: Overview of Scotland PA's premise and setting
- Shakespeare's Tragedy vs. Morrissette's Comedy: Original play's tragic vision contrasted with film
- The Witches and the Stoners: A Study in Contrast: Film's opening scenes and stoner witches analyzed
- Aristotle's Tragedy and the Film's Comic Vision: Aristotle's definition applied to film and play
- Cinematic and Theatrical Elements in Scotland PA: Music, framing, and costume techniques examined
- Conclusion: Comedy Gained, Tragedy Lost: Final verdict on what the adaptation gains and loses
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper consistently grounds its analysis in direct comparison between the source text and the adaptation, making the argument concrete and traceable throughout.
- It draws on Aristotle's definition of tragedy to provide a theoretical framework, giving the evaluative claims academic grounding beyond mere plot summary.
- Specific scene analysis — such as the Ferris wheel opening, the Beethoven slow-motion sequence, and the framing of Banko in the food truck — demonstrates close reading of both film and text.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper models comparative literary and film analysis: it does not simply describe the film or the play in isolation but uses each as a lens to illuminate the other. By citing specific dialogue from both Shakespeare and the film, and by applying Aristotle's criteria for tragedy, the writer shows how close reading can be extended from page to screen.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a plot-level introduction establishing the adaptation's premise, then moves into a discussion of Shakespeare's original tragic vision. It then analyzes key divergences — the witches/stoners contrast and the film's comedic dialogue — before invoking Aristotle to theorize the genre difference. Cinematic techniques (framing, music, slow motion) are then analyzed, and the paper closes with a verdict on what the film gains and loses in departing from its source material.
Introduction: Transplanting Macbeth to 1970s America
Billy Morrissette's 2001 film Scotland PA is a dark comedy adaptation of Shakespeare's The Tragedy of Macbeth. The film is set in small-town USA in the 1970s; instead of a castle, the main stage is a diner; instead of a warrior as in the original, Joe "Mac" McBeth is an employee of the diner's owner. Instead of an heir to the throne, McDuff is a detective working the case as it develops. Instead of witches, the prophets of the film are two comedic stoners and their fortune-telling girlfriend.
The film succeeds with these script changes because it grounds the action in comedy, with wry humorous lines given to the characters as they navigate the plot. Because it is a dark comedy, the themes of murder and insanity are treated with some levity, and the resolution comes off as more just and happy than tragic: Mac's treachery is discovered, and McDuff comes into possession of the diner, fulfilling his secret dream of breaking into the diner business. Outside the basic outline of plot points, the film differs from the original play in just about every way imaginable — yet the adaptation works because it has fun with the changes and does not insist upon using the source material for anything more than basic plotting purposes.
Shakespeare's Tragedy vs. Morrissette's Comedy
The original The Tragedy of Macbeth is conceived and executed as a tragic drama. The hero of the play is Macbeth: his tragic fall is a result of his pride and ambition; spurred on by his scheming wife, he kills the king and claims the crown for himself. The power grab does not allow him any rest, however; he feels threatened on all sides and goes on a killing spree that culminates in a battle for the throne, at which point he is decapitated — but not before realizing that his plunge into nihilism and bloodshed was precipitated by a foolish belief in the prophecies of the three deceiving witches.
The contemporary adaptation has none of the tragic vision of the original. The film plays the plot for laughs, turning the witches into buffoonish stoners; turning Banquo into a slow but not entirely dim-witted clerk at the diner; and turning Macduff into a loveable old-school detective whose appearance and demeanor are starkly out of keeping with the hippie-ish aspect of the rest of the characters. The film replaces the poetic dialogue of the original with contemporary vernacular and action used for humorous purposes. The only ways in which the film really bears any resemblance to the original are in the use of names and in the use of the basic plot outline — though it does play on some of the language from the original.
The Witches and the Stoners: A Study in Contrast
The film opens with a cinematic touch, giving a long shot of a fair as its lights are shut off. The fair is over — but sitting in one of the rides are the two stoners and their girlfriend. They drop a bucket of chicken as they riff on "foul" and "fair," with one saying, "The fair was fair," another saying, "The fair was foul," and a third summarizing the comedic mood of the film with the words, "My ass hurts," while the others giggle (Morrissette). This opening immediately signals what kind of adaptation of Macbeth this film will be. For a modern audience whose only encounter with Shakespeare is likely to have been an arbitrary semester in high school or college, the comedic mood of the film is likely to be welcomed. The stoner "witches" are more relatable to a contemporary audience, and their humor is the kind of low-brow comedy typically found in modern films.
The original play is far more dramatic and soul-searching. It opens with the witches planning their next rendezvous to ensnare the hero Macbeth, who is at that moment wandering home from the battlefield with Banquo. The witches declare: "Fair is foul, and foul is fair," and these words are later echoed by Macbeth, who says to Banquo, "So foul and fair a day I have not seen" — his very first words in the play (Shakespeare). The original heightens the tension between right and wrong by foregrounding these dramatic themes from the outset.
This sense of dramatic tension is lost in Morrissette's adaptation. The sense that Macbeth's soul is at stake and has been targeted by the witches is never felt in the film as it is in the play. There is nothing sinister about the stoners and their girlfriend, and therefore the entire stoner/girlfriend framing device feels like an arbitrary addition to link the film to the play rather than something organically relevant to the story. In the original, the witches are central to the plot, because it is their seduction of Macbeth — their tempting of his ambition — that draws him into the dark side. The film's opening tone rejects the seriousness of the drama and therefore begins on an unconvincing footing. It recovers once the other characters are introduced, but McBeth is never really presented as a heroic character of significant stature. He comes across as a down-on-his-luck, befuddled figure who has a flash of valor. It is fun to watch Detective McDuff attempt to solve the case — which is why the film works as a dark comedy — but the dark side of the comedy never feels as dark as the original source material, and the silliness of the stoners is part of the reason for this shortcoming.
Conclusion: Comedy Gained, Tragedy Lost
The film succeeds mainly because it plays itself as a comedy. It takes the tragic source material of the play and makes it into something new. The names of the characters and the basic plot are similar to the source material — but this film is fundamentally a dark comedy. McBeth is not as heroic as Macbeth in Shakespeare's play, but he is not meant to be. The happy ending of the film really belongs to McDuff, who gets to take over the diner and fulfill his secret dream. McBeth dies — but he is not decapitated as he is in the play.
Essentially, what the film says that the play does not is that these themes of good and evil can be treated lightheartedly and updated to more modern times to give the audience fun rather than labor. The original play has few comical scenes, but the film adaptation is loaded with them — every scene is played for laughs. The film seems to argue that one can appreciate Shakespeare without taking it so seriously. Yet by not taking it seriously, the filmmaker diminishes the tragic nature of the play and transforms it into something altogether different. There is no real cathartic effect at the end of Scotland PA — not as there is in Shakespeare's play — because one never genuinely feels that McBeth is a legitimately noble person. Even his "heroism" is depicted in a comedic manner, like something from a typical sitcom. So while the film is good for laughs, it is bad for drama.
Works Cited
Aristotle. Poetics. http://www.gutenberg.org/files/1974/1974-h/1974-h.htm
Johnson, G. and Arp, T. Perrine's Literature. Boston, MA: Cengage, 2018.
Morrissette, Billy [dir.]. Scotland PA. Lot 47 Films.
Shakespeare, William. The Tragedy of Macbeth. http://shakespeare.mit.edu/macbeth/full.html
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.