This paper examines Shaw and McKay's social disorganization theory, which holds that crime emerges when community residents lack shared values and a collective sense of responsibility. The paper identifies the key variables contributing to social disorganization β including residential instability, ethnic diversity, family disruption, economic status, and population density β and explains how each undermines community cohesion. It then proposes practical solutions such as community centers, neighborhood watch programs, and Head Start initiatives to rebuild social bonds and reduce crime over the short and long term.
The Shaw and McKay social disorganization theory suggests that social disorganization is rooted in the inability of community residents to feel a sense of common society or shared responsibility toward one another. Community residents lack a commonly shared culture and values, and as a result, even though they may suffer the same problems β such as crime β they cannot arrive at collectively shared solutions. This may occur for several reasons, or as the product of multiple contributing variables.
Residential instability, such as a high level of mobility in and out of a community, creates a sense of disconnection between residents and negatively impacts the long-term health of the neighborhood. The area may be populated largely by younger people who are renters or squatters, and even the most economically and psychologically stable individuals may be people seeking to leave in search of a better location. They do not have a meaningful investment in the long-term health of the community ("Social Disorganization and Rural Communities," 2003, OJJDP Bulletin).
Ethnic diversity can also create a sense of disconnection between community members, as residents may feel prejudiced or hostile toward their neighbors. Family disruption may result in a community composed of many single-parent households, with mothers and fathers working two jobs and spending little time at home. Economic status likewise influences community cohesion: very poor areas may be populated by people wishing to leave who dislike their neighborhood, while very wealthy areas can also be socially disorganized, as residents covet the privacy of gated communities rather than the security that comes from knowing β and caring about β their neighbors.
Population size and density may generate disconnection through the anonymity that comes with sheer numbers. Proximity to urban areas may also diminish residents' capacity to form local social relationships, since their primary social ties may be with coworkers in distant locations rather than with the community in which they live ("Social Disorganization and Rural Communities," 2003, OJJDP Bulletin).
"Community centers and neighborhood watch reduce crime"
"Head Start and education build lasting community cohesion"
You’re 50% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.