Is Shylock Really the Greediest Character in The Merchant of Venice?
This essay challenges the common assumption that Shylock, the Jewish moneylender in Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice, is the most avaricious character in the play. Through close reading of key scenes and speeches, the paper argues that Shylock consistently places personal relationships and emotional bonds above financial gain, while the Christian character Bassanio is motivated primarily by mercenary interests. The essay traces the roles of Antonio, Portia, and Jessica alongside Shylock to show how Shakespeare uses money as a lens for examining love, loyalty, and prejudice in Venetian society.
- Introduction: Money and Relationships in the Play: Antonio risks all for Bassanio's mercenary courtship
- Shylock: Moneylender but Not Purely Mercenary: Shylock's grief over Leah's ring reveals emotional depth
- Bassanio: The Truly Money-Driven Character: Bassanio chooses lead but desires Portia's wealth
- Shylock's Revenge and the Court Scene: Shylock refuses payment, prioritizing vengeance over gold
- Conclusion: Hollow Victories and True Values: Portia's marriage victory undermined by Bassanio's betrayal
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper makes a counterintuitive argument — that Shylock is not the greediest character — and supports it with direct quotations and scene references throughout.
- It builds its case comparatively, measuring multiple characters (Shylock, Bassanio, Antonio, Portia) against each other rather than analyzing Shylock in isolation.
- The essay ends with a thematically resonant observation: Portia's own victory is undermined by Bassanio's willingness to give away her ring, tying the conclusion back to the paper's central theme.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates close reading as an interpretive method. Rather than summarizing plot, it selects specific speeches — particularly Shylock's "wilderness of monkeys" line (3.1) — and unpacks their emotional and thematic significance. This technique shows how a single textual moment can overturn a broad cultural assumption about a character.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by establishing the play's central concern with money, then introduces Antonio and Bassanio. It pivots to Shylock, using textual evidence to argue he prioritizes love and honor over wealth. The third movement reframes Bassanio as the truly mercenary figure. The court scene then serves as a climactic test of values. The conclusion ties the threads together by reflecting on the irony of Portia's marriage. Five clearly implied sections carry a single sustained argument.
Introduction: Money and Relationships in the Play
William Shakespeare's The Merchant of Venice is a play primarily concerned with the importance of money and with how placing too much value upon wealth can disturb relationships in society. At the beginning of the play, Bassanio wishes to marry the heiress Portia, primarily because he needs money. He appeals to his friend Antonio, the merchant of the title, for enough funds so that he can at least appear wealthy when he presents himself as a suitor to the rich Portia. Antonio cares deeply for Bassanio and is willing to risk everything for him, valuing their friendship above money. To give Bassanio what he needs, Antonio must borrow from Shylock, a Jewish moneylender.
Antonio places his physical safety and reputation below his love for Bassanio — unlike Bassanio, who is willing to put his friend at risk and to pursue a love match for purely mercenary purposes. This contrast establishes the play's central irony: the character most commonly assumed to be driven by greed is, in fact, one of the least money-obsessed figures in the story.
Works Cited
Shakespeare, William. "The Merchant of Venice." MIT Classics Page. 2006.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.