Sony Ericsson's Mobile Strategy: Markets, Partnerships, and Competition
This paper reviews Sony Ericsson's strategic positioning in the mobile phone industry as of 2008, examining the company's response to intense competition from Apple, Google, and Nokia. The analysis covers Sony Ericsson's joint venture with Microsoft to develop Windows Mobile devices, its continued commitment to Symbian technology for high-end smartphones, and its expansion focus on developing markets like China and India. The paper evaluates the adequacy of the company's multi-pronged approach and offers recommendations regarding market prioritization and cost competitiveness.
- Market Position and Competitive Threats: Sony Ericsson's ranking, growth, and rivals
- Strategic Partnerships and Product Development: Microsoft and Symbian partnerships explained
- Geographic Expansion and Market Focus: Focus on emerging markets and regional strategy
- Evaluation of Strategic Initiatives: Assessment of multi-pronged approach effectiveness
- Recommendations for Future Direction: Cost leadership and market prioritization advice
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly identifies and contextualize specific competitive threats (Apple's user interface innovation, Google's Android platform, Nokia's market position) with concrete details from the source article.
- Structures the analysis around actionable strategic dimensions: partnerships, product lines, and geographic markets, making the company's multi-pronged approach transparent and evaluable.
- Acknowledges trade-offs explicitly—particularly the tension between cost leadership and innovation, and the risk of overextension across multiple initiatives.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper applies socio-technical systems analysis to a business case, examining how Sony Ericsson's organizational choices (partnerships, product strategy) interact with technology platforms (Windows Mobile vs. Symbian) and market conditions. This interdisciplinary lens allows the writer to move beyond surface-level strategy description to evaluate feasibility and risk.
Structure breakdown
The essay follows a diagnostic-to-prescriptive arc: it first establishes Sony Ericsson's current market position and threats, then catalogs the three-part strategic response (Microsoft partnership, Symbian continuation, emerging-market focus), evaluates whether these initiatives sufficiently address competitive gaps, and concludes with prioritized recommendations. This structure mirrors real business analysis, grounding recommendations in prior assessment rather than assertion.
Market Position and Competitive Threats
As of February 2008, Sony Ericsson held the fourth-largest market share among global mobile phone manufacturers, with an expanding rather than declining position in the industry. The joint venture between Sony and Ericsson has achieved remarkable growth: unit volumes and revenues have doubled over the past three years, increasing global market share by three percentage points to 9.5%. In November 2007, Hideki "Dick" Komiyama, a 64-year-old Sony veteran, assumed the CEO role and inherited both significant momentum and formidable competitive challenges.
The competitive landscape in 2008 presented three major threats to Sony Ericsson's market position. Apple's iPhone had fundamentally altered consumer expectations by introducing a revolutionary user interface and ease of use that set a new industry standard. As one analyst noted, "Apple has raised the bar for all other handsets with its revolutionary user interface and ease of use," though at a premium price point that limited mass-market adoption (Schenker 2008). Google's Android platform represented an emerging open-source alternative for mid-range devices, designed to deliver web-friendly functionality without Apple's cost premium. Nokia, already the market leader, continued to dominate with established distribution and brand loyalty.
The core challenge facing Sony Ericsson and its rivals was articulated clearly: "The challenge for rivals is to recreate the Apple experience on less expensive phones and thus create a mass market" (Schenker 2008). This formulation captured the central strategic tension—innovation had become table stakes, but cost-effectiveness was the true gateway to market expansion. Sony's market share growth, while commendable, remained vulnerable to disruption if the company could not address the innovation-versus-affordability trade-off.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.