This paper analyzes Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's The Sorrows of Young Werther through a modern psychological and moral lens. Drawing on direct quotations from Werther's letters, the paper examines his emotional sensitivity, his rapid descent into obsessive infatuation with the already-betrothed Lotte, and his recurring tendency to compare himself to a child. The analysis addresses how societal norms surrounding fidelity and relationships both shaped and failed to restrain Werther's behavior, ultimately arguing that while his fate was tragic, personal responsibility — rather than societal forces — bears the greatest weight. The paper also considers the impact of Werther's suicide on those around him, particularly Lotte and Albert.
The paper demonstrates close reading with contextual commentary: each quotation is introduced with its date and narrative context, then unpacked for its psychological or thematic significance. This technique shows how to move from evidence to interpretation without letting quotations stand alone or be over-paraphrased.
The paper opens with a brief framing introduction that previews all major analytical threads. A substantial "Book Snippets" section presents primary-source evidence organized thematically (sensitivity, obsession, child-like self-reference, and societal commentary). The Analysis section then synthesizes those threads into broader arguments about obsession versus infatuation and personal responsibility versus societal blame. A short conclusion restates the tragedy without excusing the protagonist. This two-part evidence-then-analysis structure is a reliable model for literary response papers.
Young Werther is perhaps an extreme case of love gone wrong. While it is neither normal nor reasonable for people to take their own lives when someone they desire is already spoken for, it does indeed happen even in the modern age. Goethe's novel is set in a time not long after the American Revolution — more than two hundred years ago — yet the parallels and moral questions it poses remain relevant and important. They can thus be analyzed and assessed through both a modern and a historical lens. This paper covers several perspectives on the book, including Werther's emotional sensitivity, his overall psychological state, his propensity to compare himself to a child, how society may have contributed to the tragic choice he eventually made, and precisely how that choice manifested and was carried out (Goethe).
Werther's sensitivity becomes obvious and apparent early in Goethe's text, as evidenced by the way he speaks. Even accounting for the difference in era, his speech patterns and the way he describes people are clearly indicative of someone who is extraordinarily passionate, emotional, and sensitive. Werther himself uses the word "artist" when describing his mindset and viewpoints. He falls very hard for the woman who turns out to be Lotte almost immediately. After just their first meeting, he writes in a letter: "I left the woman with regret, giving each of the children a Kreutzer, with an additional one for the youngest, to buy some wheaten bread for his broth when she went to town next: and so we parted" (Goethe, 2008, p. 18). He then immediately describes how he would frequent that general area more often as a means of running into the woman again (Goethe, 2008, p. 18). Not even a month later, he reveals just how quickly and deeply he has fallen when he writes "everybody so describes their mistress" and "I could not restrain myself — go to her I must" (Goethe, 2008, p. 20).
As the book progresses, the depth of his obsession grows steadily deeper. The letter sent on the evening of October 27th illustrates this clearly. Consisting of only two sentences, he states: "I possess so much, but my love for her absorbs it all. I possess so much, but without her I have nothing" (Goethe, 2008, p. 75). For Werther to write this of a woman who is clearly taken is both unsettling and a sign of psychological instability. His mood does not subside over time — it only worsens. On November 3rd, he states: "Witness, heaven, how often I lie down in my bed with a wish, and even a hope, that I may never awaken again" (Goethe, 2008, p. 75). He does seem to recognize that his mindset is self-inflicted; also in the November 3rd letter, he asks: "I am alone the cause of my own woe, am I not?" (Goethe, 2008, p. 75).
Werther is further unmoored when he repeatedly refers to himself and his plight in terms befitting a child. On July 8th, he reflects on whether Charlotte is looking at him, opening his letter with: "What a child is man that he should be so solicitous about a look." He then signs off by saying, "Goodnight — what a child I am" (Goethe, 2008, p. 34). In a similar vein, on August 8th he demonstrates a degree of self-awareness when he writes: "To have seen my position so clearly, and yet to have acted like such a child!" (Goethe, 2008, p. 40). This pattern of self-reproach, paired with an inability to change course, underscores the depth of his psychological entrapment.
When it comes to societal expectations surrounding the forbidden feelings that Werther harbors for another man's fiancée — and eventually his wife — Werther uses the term "mistress" at several points throughout his letters, invoking it in both metaphorical and literal senses. The first major example occurs in the letter written on May 10th, when he writes: "and then, my friend, when darkness overspreads my eyes, and heaven and earth seem to dwell in my soul and absorb its power, like the form of a beloved mistress — then I often think with longing, Oh, would I could describe these conceptions, could impress upon paper all that is living so full and warm within me, that it might be the mirror of my soul, as my soul is the mirror of the infinite God!" (Goethe, 2008, p. 11).
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang von. The Sorrows of Werther; Elective Affinities; and A Nouvelette. Rockville, MD: Wildside Press, 2008. Print.
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.