This paper reviews Azaryahu and Foote's (2008) article on historical space as narrative medium, examining how spatial rhetoric shapes the interpretation of historical sites. The review covers three key narrative strategies the authors propose: the single-point narrative, the linear or sequential approach, and the complex multi-area strategy for large-scale or long-duration events. Each strategy is evaluated for its strengths and limitations in guiding historians to construct meaningful accounts of the past. The paper argues that because history is inherently artistic rather than scientific, spatial strategies serve as essential tools for organizing and communicating historical meaning.
The complex ideas of space and time are more philosophical than anything else, but are undeniably necessary when discussing the unique aspects of historical review. Azaryahu and Foote (2008) addressed this issue in their research as they offered models for interpreting historical sites using the concepts of space and time. This essay reviews their article and highlights the important aspects of spatial rhetoric, examining how certain spatial strategies can be applied to modify a historical narrative for academic purposes.
The research article was premised on the idea that actual space may dictate the historical interpretation of any single historic event. The authors wrote: "historical sites provide a tangible link to the past that they evoke. In this sense, the presentation of history on-site only makes explicit that which is implicit in the local landscape." This concretization of history carries certain advantages and disadvantages; however, the research is dedicated to revealing how spatial rhetoric may be incorporated to help guide, create, and shape the ideas of history.
History itself is interpretive rather than fixed. The numerous variables and circumstances that contribute to any one event are virtually infinite, and deducing original causes becomes difficult, if not impossible. Recognizing that history is an art rather than a science also makes this reading more applicable to real-world usage. Since the recreation of events through historical accounts will always fall short of lived experience, certain points of view and strategies are recommended to help guide the historian in using spatial rhetoric to best advantage.
The authors introduced the single point narrative to discuss spatial rhetoric from the most straightforward point of view. They wrote: "declamatory strategies positioned at a single point can be effective when events extend across areas too large to be viewed at once or are inaccessible." The single point narrative is simple because it places one person at the center of the event and invites all others to view that historic event from that single viewpoint.
This strategy is beneficial because of its simplicity and the flexibility it grants the historian to interject personal ideas into that single point. At the same time, the strategy is limited because it ignores many other important factors and contributions to the historic storyline. While the bias inherent in this approach may be exploited to make stronger rhetorical points, it is most useful when tackling large events that require some degree of organizational control.
"Intermediate strategy for multi-route events"
"Strategy for large-scale or long-duration history"
You’re 58% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.