This paper examines the mechanisms by which U.S. law enforcement agencies share criminal information across state lines. Using a scenario in which a California resident with a criminal record is pulled over in Florida, the paper explores key legal frameworks and tools — including the Interstate Driver's License Compact, the USA PATRIOT Act, fusion centers, and federal criminal databases — that enable officers to access suspect records in real time. The paper also briefly outlines the potential charges a suspect may face when cross-state information sharing reveals prior offenses or parole violations.
Consider a scenario in which a California resident with a criminal record takes his first trip out of state to Miami, Florida and is pulled over for speeding. When stopped, the police officer already has access to a considerable amount of information about him — his name, date of birth, previous offenses, height, and weight. The suspect is handcuffed and placed in the back of the patrol car.
This scenario raises an important question: how did the Florida officer obtain information about a California resident so quickly? This paper explores the methods available to law enforcement officers for gaining criminal information across state lines, including key legal frameworks and communication tools that make such access possible.
The Interstate Driver's License Compact allows the 45 states that participate to share information with one another (DUI Laws, 2010). These states share information about drunk driving convictions through a central database that law enforcement officers can access while on the road.
The PATRIOT Act became law in 2001, allowing different law enforcement agencies across the United States to share information with one another. Prior to its passage, there were significant limitations on information sharing between states and between different law enforcement agencies (Sales, 2010). The PATRIOT Act made it substantially easier for different agencies and states to exchange information, and also broadened the ability of law enforcement officers to access individuals' records (Larance, 2010).
As a result of this legislation, a centralized federal database now exists that all states can access to both share and retrieve criminal information.
Law enforcement agencies also rely on specialized databases to gather information about criminal offenses. These databases allow an officer to input a driver's license number and retrieve any prior criminal record on file. Each state maintains fusion centers, which were designed to help close the information gap experienced by law enforcement agents in the field (Homeland Security, 2007). The primary goal of fusion centers is to ensure that officers have timely access to the information they need to better serve and protect the public.
Law enforcement officers in Florida now have access to computers in their squad cars, which are used to gather information about potential suspects. In the scenario described above, the officer could have entered the driver's license number into his in-car computer and retrieved a record of prior criminal offenses. The legal frameworks discussed — the PATRIOT Act, the Interstate Driver's License Compact, and the federal database system — all facilitate this type of access.
Alternatively, the officer could have contacted a fusion center by phone, which would have provided the requested information. The PATRIOT Act enables criminal information to move from state law enforcement databases into a shared database accessible by every state. The Interstate Driver's License Compact gives all 45 participating states access to a common database where drunk driving information is stored. Any law enforcement agent in any state may access the federal database to retrieve criminal records (Sember, 2010).
In practical terms, the suspect in this scenario could be arrested for speeding. If tested for driving under the influence and found to be over the legal limit, he could also be charged with drunk driving. Should he resist arrest, an additional charge of resisting arrest could apply. Furthermore, if he is on parole and was prohibited from leaving California, he could be charged with violating the terms of his parole agreement. The law enforcement agent can also obtain additional information by contacting the state of California directly — local police departments face no restrictions on sharing this type of criminal information.
The Interstate Driver's License Compact, the USA PATRIOT Act, fusion centers, and federal criminal databases collectively enable law enforcement officers to access criminal records across state lines quickly and effectively. Each mechanism plays a distinct role in ensuring that officers in the field have the information they need, regardless of where the suspect's record originated. Together, these tools have significantly reduced the barriers to inter-state and inter-agency information sharing in the United States.
"How each tool applies to Uncle Bob's traffic stop"
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.