Is the World Ordered by Superhuman Intelligence? A Bostrom Analysis
This essay examines the claim that our world is the result of superhuman intelligent ordering, arguing against it by drawing primarily on the work of philosopher Nick Bostrom. The paper distinguishes superhuman intelligence from theological concepts of God and focuses on the technological and philosophical dimensions of the question. Using Bostrom's own prediction that superintelligence remains a future development, the essay argues that no such ordering force currently governs the world. It further supports this conclusion by referencing Werner Heisenberg's Kantian-influenced view that humans lack the perceptual capacity to fully know — let alone replicate — the natural world, making the creation of a world-governing superintelligence all the more unlikely.
- Defining Superhuman Intelligence: Distinguishing superhuman intelligence from theology and God
- Bostrom's Timeline: Superintelligence as a Future Event: Bostrom's prediction places superintelligence in the future
- Causal Order and the Absence of Superintelligence: Causal reasoning rules out recent emergence of ordering intelligence
- Human Enhancement and the Linear Development of Intelligence: Linear human progress means superintelligence is still forthcoming
- Heisenberg's Epistemological Limits on Human Creation: Heisenberg argues humans cannot fully know or replicate nature
- Conclusion: Both thinkers confirm no superhuman ordering exists yet
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper opens with a careful definitional move — separating "superhuman intelligence" from theological notions of God — which grounds the argument in a tractable, philosophical rather than religious frame.
- It uses an author's own predictions against the thesis being disputed: since Bostrom himself placed superintelligence in the future, his work becomes evidence that such ordering has not yet occurred.
- Bringing in Heisenberg provides a second, independent line of reasoning that reinforces the conclusion from an epistemological angle, giving the argument more breadth.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates using a source's internal logic as counter-evidence: rather than simply citing an opposing authority, the writer shows that Bostrom's own forward-looking claims imply the absence of superintelligence in the present. This technique — turning a thinker's premises against the opposing claim — is a hallmark of effective philosophical argumentation.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a definitional introduction, then moves through three Bostrom-focused analytical sections (his timeline, causal reasoning, and human enhancement model), before pivoting to Heisenberg for a contrasting philosophical perspective. A brief conclusion synthesizes both lines of reasoning. The structure is broadly linear and argument-building, appropriate for a short undergraduate philosophy essay.
Defining Superhuman Intelligence
Before determining whether the world at present is the result of some sort of superhuman intelligent ordering, it is important to clarify what is meant by the concept of superhuman intelligence. Specifically, it is vital to establish that such an intelligence does not refer to the ecclesiastical or to theology in any way. Although virtually any layman might consider superhuman intelligence to be a synonym for God, that entity is generally conceived as a force — an eternal, omniscient being beyond human comprehension. The term intelligence, however, distinctly pertains to organisms and may be used to refer to other species of creatures (such as chimpanzees, aliens, and the like). Once supernatural factors are set aside, it becomes fairly clear that there is a plethora of evidence indicating that the contemporary world is most assuredly not the result of superhuman intelligent ordering. Moreover, several works by some of the most noted thinkers on this subject readily corroborate this conclusion.
Bostrom's Timeline: Superintelligence as a Future Event
One of the most prominent contemporary thinkers on this subject is Nick Bostrom, a Swedish philosopher. There are several facets of Bostrom's work that support the notion that a superhuman intelligence is not responsible for the ordering of the world. Ironically, however, Bostrom does not rule out the possibility that such an intelligence could come into existence and come to mold the planet to its liking. The following quotation readily confirms this: "This paper outlines the case for believing that we will have superhuman artificial intelligence within the first third of the next century" (Bostrom, 1998). What is particularly important about this quotation is that Bostrom is referring to events that will take place in the future. Although this work was written at the end of the last millennium, it was updated the following decade, and the author was still writing about things that had yet to occur. As such, they had not already taken place, which indicates that at the time of writing, superhuman intelligence was not ordering or structuring the world — although the author believed that at some conceivable point in the future it could and would.
There is another critical point implied by this evidence. Bostrom believed that some form of superintelligence could one day exert its influence over the world at large. He also believed it had not happened yet. However, there is a line of succession in the ideas and advancements that take place throughout history — one arrives at a conclusion only after accumulating evidence that is strongly suggestive of it. If Bostrom believed in the late 1990s that superintelligence was forthcoming, this means it was also forthcoming during all of the years that preceded his prediction. This rationale is difficult to counter when examined through the lens of Bostrom's own argument. If he believed superintelligence had yet to manifest, it had not already done so. Thus, the world in all of the years prior to his initial 1998 assertion — which he re-asserted at the end of the following decade — was bereft of the influence of superhuman intelligent ordering.
Causal Order and the Absence of Superintelligence
It is important to recognize that there is an inherent connection between events that hinges upon temporality. What is taking place now is related to that which was planned and set in motion in previous years. One could pose the counterargument that at some point a superintelligence could suddenly have emerged and caused things to be the way they are. Such a supposition, however, does not account for the nature of time and causal relationships. An illustrative example can be found by considering the presidency of the United States. If one were to argue that a superhuman intelligence had suddenly asserted itself in the years since Bostrom declared such an intelligence was still forthcoming, one would have to reckon with the fact that many of the events and occurrences taking place are the natural results of a period in which no superintelligence existed. A sitting president, for example, is elected and governs through processes rooted in prior social, political, and institutional conditions — not because of any external superintelligent machinations, but because of occurrences that took place before any such intelligence existed. There are myriad other examples that demonstrate this fundamental point.
It is possible that a superhuman intelligence could exist at some near-future moment after Bostrom declared none was yet present. However, the present ordering and structuring of the world would not be significantly influenced by it, because the world is obviously still significantly shaped by the period in which Bostrom affirmed such a power was still forthcoming.
Conclusion
In summary, it is extremely unlikely that the world as it is currently known is under the influence of any superseding form of intelligence. The most optimistic of the philosophers discussed here — Bostrom — believes that mankind's capacity to create such an intelligence is still in the making. Specifically, he holds that the process by which human intelligence and progress unfolds is still unfolding, and that once it reaches the point of producing superintelligence, it will be such a tremendous and impactful occurrence that there will be no need to question or doubt the presence of such an intelligence. Other thinkers, such as the physicist Heisenberg, see an inherent limitation in humanity's ability to perceive the world, let alone to create something capable of accurately controlling it. From the perspectives of each of these esteemed thinkers, one can safely conclude that the world is not under the ordering of any superhuman intelligence at this time.
References
Anissimov, M. (2009). Nick Bostrom on superintelligence in Forbes. www.acceleratingfuture.com. Retrieved from http://www.acceleratingfuture.com/michael/blog/2009/06/nick-bostrom-on-superintelligence-in-forbes/
Bostrom, N. (1998). How long before superintelligence? International Journal of Future Studies, 2. Retrieved from http://www.nickbostrom.com/superintelligence.html
Burns, M. (2013). Heisenberg on the delusion of scientism. www.defendingchrist.org. Retrieved from
Danaher, J. (2012). Bostrom on superintelligence and orthogonality. Philosophical Disquisitions. Retrieved from http://philosophicaldisquisitions.blogspot.com/2012/04/bostrom-on-superintelligence-and.html
Sutherland, J. (2006). The ideas interview: Nick Bostrom; John Sutherland meets a transhumanist who wrestles with the ethics of technologically enhanced human beings. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/science/2006/may/09/academicexperts.genetics
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.