This paper examines the role of supply chain management within the value delivery network, focusing on how firms leverage suppliers, merchants, intermediaries, and logistics facilitators to gain competitive advantage. Drawing on resource-based theory and sustainability frameworks, the paper argues that superior supply chain management — when consistently maintained — can become a durable source of competitive differentiation. The paper also addresses risk management, illustrating through the Nokia-Ericsson case how robust supply chain practices protect firms during disruptive events. The discussion concludes by noting how buyer-driven demands reshape the value delivery network over time.
The paper demonstrates effective source synthesis: each cited work is introduced to advance a specific stage of the argument rather than simply being summarized. Priem and Swink establish the theoretical foundation, Seuring and Müller extend it toward sustainability, and Chopra and Sodhi shift the focus to operational risk — together forming a coherent progression rather than isolated literature points.
The paper opens by defining the value delivery network and its key actors, then builds the competitive advantage argument through two theoretical frameworks. It pivots to risk management with an empirical case study, and closes by examining how buyer behavior actively reshapes the network. The structure moves logically from theory to application to practical insight.
The value delivery network is comprised of all direct participants in an industry, and it is important to understand the ways in which supply chain management contributes to that network. Suppliers, intermediaries, agents, and logistics partners are all part of the supply chain. Participants in the industry manage the supply chain in order to extract value that competitors cannot — either by moving goods more cheaply, more quickly, or preferably both. There are several different actors within the supply chain whose contributions to the value delivery network are relevant; merchants and facilitators are two of the most important.
Priem and Swink (2012) view the issue of supply chain management through the resource-based theory of the firm. They argue that firms can gain competitive advantage by effectively managing key inputs. This means that they are able to find the best goods at the best prices from merchants, and bring those goods to market in the most effective way — whether measured by price or speed — through the skilled management of facilitators. Firms that are able to consistently manage key resources (inputs) will have long-run competitive advantage over their competitors.
Seuring and Müller (2008) make the point that it may be possible to establish supply chain management as a source of sustainable competitive advantage, provided that the supply chain management systems themselves are sustained. The authors note that when a firm develops competencies in supply chain management that its competitors do not possess, it gains market advantages that — if the supply chain management is maintained — may be difficult for competitors to replicate.
You’re 38% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.