Symantec's Strategy of Acquiring Entrepreneurial Companies
This paper evaluates Symantec's strategy of acquiring small, entrepreneurial technology companies as a driver of growth and innovation. It examines the benefits of this approach—including cost savings on internal R&D, access to new market niches, and synergy creation—alongside key risks such as market obsolescence, product integration failure, and cultural incompatibility. The paper also analyzes Symantec's structured three-phase acquisition model (Prospecting, Scrubbing, and Integration), detailing how cross-functional teams of varying sizes guide each stage. Special attention is given to the company's emphasis on a well-managed acquisition announcement as a tool for retaining key talent and ensuring organizational alignment.
- Introduction to Symantec's Acquisition Approach: Overview of cross-functional acquisition teams and strategy
- Merits of Acquiring Entrepreneurial Companies: Benefits including R&D savings, market entry, and synergies
- Risks and Uncertainties in the Acquisition Strategy: Market, product, and people risks examined
- Phase 1: Prospecting: Deal desirability review and initial screening process
- Phase 2: Scrubbing: Detailed due diligence with expanded cross-functional team
- Phase 3: Integration and Announcement Management: Onboarding, liaison roles, and strategic announcement planning
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Clearly balances a merits-and-demerits framework before transitioning into a process analysis, giving the paper a logical two-part structure.
- Grounds abstract strategic concepts (synergy, risk categories) in concrete details drawn from Symantec's documented practices, making the argument more credible.
- Integrates peer-reviewed academic citations (Laamanen & Kell; Love & Roper) to support claims about cross-functional teams and serial acquirer performance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied case analysis: it takes a real company's documented strategy and evaluates it against both academic theory and practical risk categories. Rather than simply describing what Symantec does, the author connects each practice to a broader strategic rationale, showing why the approach succeeds or where it carries inherent danger.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an overview of Symantec's cross-functional acquisition team model, then moves into a two-sided evaluation of merits (R&D savings, market entry, synergy) versus risks (market, product, and people). The second half systematically walks through Symantec's three-phase acquisition model—Prospecting, Scrubbing, and Integration—with team-size escalation and key activities at each stage. The paper concludes by highlighting the strategic importance of the acquisition announcement itself.
Introduction to Symantec's Acquisition Approach
There are many dimensions to Symantec's acquisition style, and this strategy drove a significant portion of the company's success in the mid-to-late 1990s. The company employed an acquisition team that was cross-functional in composition and was sized according to the current stage of the acquisition. Team members would perform their normal responsibilities alongside the additional duties demanded by each acquisition project. The composition of cross-functional teams has been shown to be an invaluable asset in overcoming spatial and organizational barriers in the acquisition process, especially when technical elements are involved (Love & Roper, 2008).
Merits of Acquiring Entrepreneurial Companies
Entrepreneurial acquisitions of small but growing high-technology companies carry significant potential to create value for both organizations involved. Smaller, growing firms often lack the internal capabilities needed to further expand their product lineups. For example, a smaller firm that has successfully exploited a technology opportunity may not possess a dedicated marketing team to help promote its products, nor adequate administrative capacity to keep pace with the transactional demands of growth. Larger firms, however, generally have deep competencies in these areas, and organizations with more acquisition experience increase the likelihood of success (Laamanen & Kell, 2008).
A larger firm such as Symantec has a great deal to gain through entrepreneurial acquisitions. One key benefit is the ability to avoid the cost and risk of internal research and development by simply purchasing technologies that have already proven successful in the market. Symantec has used this approach to enter market niches such as desktop productivity, communication tools, programming development tools, and utilities including network managers, virus checkers, and remote management products. The company is then able to leverage its existing experience and resources to combine comparable products and processes, creating synergies across the two organizations.
Risks and Uncertainties in the Acquisition Strategy
Despite the many potential benefits of this acquisition strategy, there are an equally large number of risks and uncertainties that can cause havoc for both organizations. In Symantec's case, three categories of risk are considered at various points throughout the deal process: market risk, product risk, and people risk.
In the technology sector, the market moves incredibly fast, and the risk of obsolescence lurks at every turn. Product risk refers to the challenge of ensuring that the combined company can successfully create products that function effectively together. Finally, people risk is arguably the most potent of the three. Even if market and product risks are successfully mitigated, there remains the ever-present danger that the two organizations cannot form a functioning unit due to cultural or interpersonal differences. According to research on mergers and acquisitions, cultural integration is consistently cited as one of the most common sources of post-merger failure.
Works Cited
Laamanen, T. & Kell, T., 2008. Performance of serial acquirers: toward an acquisition program perspective. Strategic Management, 29(6), pp. 663–672.
Love, J. & Roper, S., 2008. Organizing innovation: Complementarities between cross-functional teams. Technovation, 29(3), pp. 192–203.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.