Tattoo Subculture in America: Origins and Mainstream Rise
This paper traces the history and sociological significance of tattoo culture in the United States, from its 19th-century origins among military men and circus performers to its emergence as a mainstream cultural practice in the 21st century. Drawing on sociological definitions of subculture, the paper examines how tattooing shifted from a marker of individual identity and patriotism to a symbol of group membership, deviance, and ultimately mass fashion. It also addresses the misrepresentation of tattoo culture in popular media, the role of celebrity influence, and what sociologists such as Mark Taylor have said about tattooing as a sign of postmodern primitivism. The paper concludes by reflecting on what the widespread acceptance of tattoos reveals about broader shifts in American social values.
- Introduction: Tattooing in American Culture: Tattoos shift from fringe symbol to mainstream expression
- The Origins of Tattooing in America: Civil War soldiers and circus performers spark tattoo culture
- The Tattoo Subculture and Its Artistic Evolution: Punk, hip hop, and Polynesian art elevate tattoo craft
- Misrepresentation of Tattoo Culture: Media links tattoos to deviance and gang identity
- Tattooing Enters the Mainstream: Social revolutions of the 20th century normalize tattooing
- Sociological Perspectives on the Tattoo: Taylor's postmodern primitive theory explains tattoo appeal
- Outcomes for American Society: Tattoos reflect America's embrace of formerly taboo culture
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its cultural analysis in a clear sociological definition of subculture, then traces how tattooing both fits and complicates that definition over time.
- It uses a chronological framework effectively, moving from 19th-century origins through military and circus contexts to 21st-century mainstream acceptance without losing its analytical thread.
- The inclusion of a direct extended quotation from Rapp on the transformation of tattoo artistry strengthens the argument about legitimacy and skill as drivers of cultural change.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of secondary source synthesis: rather than summarizing each source independently, the writer weaves together multiple scholarly voices (Teffs, Rapp, Tabassum, Fisher/Taylor) to build a layered argument about identity, deviance, and cultural acceptance. This technique shows how different disciplinary perspectives—art history, sociology, cultural studies—can be integrated to support a unified thesis.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad cultural observation and a thesis statement listing its main areas of inquiry. It then proceeds historically, establishing the 19th-century origins of tattooing before moving into analysis of its subculture phase, misrepresentation, and mainstream absorption. Sociological commentary is introduced mid-paper and carried through to the conclusion, which ties individual examples back to broader claims about American cultural values. The structure mirrors a classic historical-analytical essay format suitable for undergraduate sociology or cultural studies courses.
Introduction: Tattooing in American Culture
One of the most popular subcultures in America is the tattoo subculture. Over the span of roughly half a century, tattooing emerged from being a trend among sailors, circus performers, and sideshow attractions to being body art sported by bikers, convicts, professional athletes, actors, musicians, Millennials, hipsters, mothers, fathers, and just about everyone in between. Thanks to trendsetters in popular media, tattooing broke into the mainstream in the 21st century. What was once a shocking display of body ink meant to symbolize one's difference from others has now become so common that seeing a tattooed person—or a dozen of them—in a restaurant is nothing out of the ordinary.
Yet, for all its popularity, tattooing is still part of a subculture: professionals in the business world tend to avoid tattoos or at least hide the one or two they have, and many parents still discourage the practice—such as the father of NBA player Lonzo Ball, and actor Mark Wahlberg, who has had his own tattoos surgically removed. So what do tattoos represent for people, and why are they appealing to some?
The fact is that many of today's tattooed persons do not realize the significance of the tattoo subculture of days gone by. According to Teffs, "a subculture consists of a group of individuals who distinguish themselves from the overriding culture in some way, whether it be ethnically, morally, visually, attitudinally, etc." (3). Yet many today get tattoos not to stand out but to fit in: Justin Bieber is a perfect example of an artist who suddenly needed to "prove" himself as an authentic artist by getting sleeves up his arms. Today, tattooing serves as a visual way for people to express themselves differently from the status quo. This paper describes how tattooing came to America, how it led to a subculture, how that subculture is misrepresented today, how it became mainstream, what the outcomes for American society have been, and what sociologists have said about this subculture.
The Origins of Tattooing in America
Tattooing came to America in the 1860s, when the first tattoo studio opened in New York City (Vanishing Tattoo). Owned by Hildebrandt, the studio was a favorite stop for circus performers and carnival acts, whose full-body tattoos served as "freakish" attractions used to drum up business in the carnival industry. Hildebrandt's own daughter was one such sideshow attraction, bearing a full-body set of tattoos given to her by her father (Vanishing Tattoo). Overseas, the tattooing trend had caught on when the Prince of Wales tattooed a cross on himself. In the United States, tattooing was mainly linked to similarly patriotic gestures: soldiers, especially in the Navy, got tattoos as mementos—ink to remember their unit, their home, or a loved one.
From the Civil War through World War I and World War II, tattooing was popular among those in the military. Tattoo artists in the 20th century began to arrive in earnest for WWII soldiers, putting eagles or buxom blondes on the arms of sailors (Vanishing Tattoo). The first half of the 20th century was mostly spent covering up sweethearts' names or inking over indecent tattoos with new designs. Popular artist Charles Wagner was interviewed in 1944 after fifty years of tattooing, and "he estimated that next to covering up the names of former sweethearts, the work which brought him the most money over the years had been complying to the Naval order of 1908," which had forbidden men from serving in the Navy if they bore indecent ink (Vanishing Tattoo).
The Tattoo Subculture and Its Artistic Evolution
America has been engaged in one war or another since the Spanish-American War, which began at the end of the 19th century, and so wartime culture was the backdrop against which the tattoo subculture first developed. America was still fairly traditional in its values and social roles up to World War II. After the war, social revolution took off, and the second half of the 20th century was radically different from the first half. Tattooing in the second half stopped being tied to patriotic acts of valor—such as military service—and began being taken up by subculture artists, including musicians in punk rock and later hip hop. Both groups viewed tattoos as a way of expressing their street credibility and their status as an "other" in society (Rapp 1).
Tattooing in America became a genuine art form once tattoo artists began creating more complete and elaborate works. As Rapp notes:
The American tattoo did not begin to enter this realm until the tattooists of the late 20th century made contact with tattooists in Polynesia and Japan and began creating custom and large-scale tattoos rather than the small and independent flash designs which had been the standard. The increasing skill and creativity expected from a tattooist has resulted in "tattoo artists," most of whom have had formal art training in the same way a painter or other traditional artist would. The effects of this change were that tattoos became more legitimate as art because of the technical prowess exhibited and the expense involved in acquiring one. (18)
With the arrival of skilled tattoo artists capable of elaborate designs, the social "other" could express their otherness through a proper aesthetic. But once this was achievable, that identity took on a significance of its own and ceased to be defined solely by its separation from the mainstream: tattooed people began to form their own in-group.
Works Cited
Fisher, Jill A. "Tattooing the body, marking culture." Body & Society 8.4 (2002): 91–107.
Rapp, Elizabeth. Stigmatization or Decoration: Tattoo as Deviance, a Cross-Cultural Study. Senior Thesis, Willamette University.
Tabassum, Naomi Joy. Tattoo Subculture: Creating a Personal Identity in the Context of Social Stigma. Diss. North Dakota State University, 2013.
Teffs, Erin. "From Cellblocks to Suburbia: Tattoos as Subcultural Style, Commodity and Self-expression." (2010). https://digitalcommons.bryant.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://scholar.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1003&context=honors_english
Vanishing Tattoo. United States. http://www.vanishingtattoo.com/tattoo_museum/united_states_tattoos.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.