Disaster Preparedness for Texas Refugees: A Resource Assessment
This paper identifies Texas refugees as a vulnerable community aggregate and examines the disaster preparedness deficits they face. It presents demographic data for Texas, outlines the barriers refugees encounter—including language obstacles, undocumented status, administrative delays, and limited access to legal rights—and discusses how these factors heighten their risk during natural disasters. The paper identifies two key support agencies, Refugee Services of Texas and the Refugee Empowerment Center, and provides emergency management coordinator contact information. It also evaluates two disaster planning websites—the Texas General Land Office and Texas City—for their usefulness in addressing refugees' unique preparedness needs. The paper concludes by calling for equitable, human-rights-consistent disaster planning policies for refugee communities.
- Introduction: Purpose and scope of practicum assessment
- Identification of the At-Risk Community Aggregate: Texas refugees as vulnerable population with demographics
- Resource Deficits Related to Disaster Preparedness: Legal, linguistic, and administrative barriers facing refugees
- Community and Agency Resources for Assisting the Aggregate: Two key agencies supporting refugees before and after disasters
- Emergency Management Coordinator and Planning Websites: Contact information and online planning tools for refugees
- Conclusion: Call for equitable, rights-based disaster preparedness policy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds the analysis in concrete demographic data from Census.gov, giving the reader a clear statistical picture of the Texas population context before examining the refugee subset.
- Moves logically from identifying the aggregate, to diagnosing deficits, to proposing specific agency and governmental remedies — a practical, solution-oriented structure well-suited to a practicum report.
- Supports claims with credible, varied sources including federal data, journalism, NGO briefs, and NASA hazard assessments, demonstrating appropriate source diversity for a public-health practicum paper.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a needs-assessment framework, systematically moving from population identification through deficit analysis to resource mapping. This technique is standard in public health and community nursing practicums: define who is at risk, explain why existing resources fall short, then link the population to concrete support structures. It balances epidemiological thinking with policy analysis by connecting immigration law, disaster management infrastructure, and social services.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction stating its purpose, then presents demographic quick-facts for context. The bulk of the argument occupies two central sections — resource deficits and available agency resources — which together form the core assessment. A dedicated section provides actionable emergency-coordinator contact information. The conclusion is brief but normative, calling for policy alignment with human rights principles. Overall length and structure reflect a practicum planning document rather than a traditional research essay.
Introduction
Persons with specific needs face barriers in receiving certain kinds of support due to societal discrimination, identity, or other relevant factors. These circumstances deprive them of rightful services that the state is not providing, leaving them unable to enjoy their lives fully as other citizens do. This paper aims to identify an at-risk or vulnerable aggregate within the population of their residential area. The demographics of the chosen aggregate are discussed, and disaster preparedness deficits are identified. Agency resources available to help this community are outlined, emergency management coordinator contact information is provided, and relevant websites are cited to address the special needs of this aggregate effectively.
Identification of the At-Risk Community Aggregate
The refugee population of Texas is selected as the at-risk or vulnerable community aggregate. Texas is one of the most populated areas in the United States in terms of refugee residence (National Immigration Forum, 2020). Approximately 10 percent of all U.S. refugees have been resettled in Texas since 2010 (McConnell, 2020). After finalization by the UNHCR and the U.S. embassy, refugees are sent to particular states according to their accommodation and resource capacities. Refugee resettlement agencies assist this community in establishing themselves in the assigned region by meeting basic housing, clothing, and food requirements.
Several characteristics of this group make it a compelling choice for this assessment. Refugees have left their countries of origin due to conflict between states, state violence, or human rights violations, and are obligated to live in another country. This shared experience of displacement is common among all individuals in this group, making it an aggregate that is inherently at risk of vulnerability. This vulnerability becomes especially pronounced during and after a disaster, since refugees may face secondary displacement during floods or other crises — events that impose high costs on state governments. Sanitation, hygiene, child protection, healthcare, and food services must all be provided for refugee populations, making them among the most vulnerable at the time of disaster.
It is commonly observed that neighboring or host countries grant refugees permission to remain within their borders. Most refugees in Texas come from the Democratic Republic of Congo, Burma, and Ukraine (National Immigration Forum, 2020). Refugees from the Democratic Republic of Congo have outnumbered those from other nations, partly because of the United States' longstanding relationship with the country following its independence from Belgium in 1960. However, during the Trump administration, a cap was imposed on incoming refugees — prior to which the United States was counted among the top countries for refugee resettlement (Krogstad, 2019). Global events and shifting U.S. policy priorities have kept the influx of refugees fluctuating over time.
The following demographic data for Texas provides context for understanding the aggregate (Census.gov, 2019):
Percent of population under five years old: 6.9%
Percent of population over 65 years old: 12.9%
Percentage of the non-White population: 21.3%
Percentage holding a bachelor's degree or higher: 29.3%
Percentage of veterans: 17%
Median value of an owner-occupied home: $161,700
Median household income: $59,570
Percentage of persons in poverty: 13.6%
Resource Deficits Related to Disaster Preparedness
Refugees in Texas can be considered a socially vulnerable aggregate with respect to natural disasters. Texas is one of the most disaster-prone states in the entire United States (NASA, 2017). Refugees face a range of complications due to resource limitations in disaster preparedness. Many have already lost loved ones, homes, and livelihoods to frequent disasters in Texas; however, numerous situations exist in which they could be assisted before becoming victims of such disasters.
Access to accurate information about the legal rights and services available during disasters is one of the major resource deficits (GCIR, 2017). Regardless of immigration status, refugees should be informed about the assistance they can access before a disaster strikes, so they are equipped for survival. Cultural and language barriers make it difficult for many refugees to understand the benefits they are entitled to, leaving those benefits underutilized. Strict administrative policies create fear, preventing refugees from taking full advantage of available services. Low-income refugees find it particularly difficult to secure resources or obtain cash funding from the government — largely because undocumented individuals cannot access the same civil and legal rights as documented residents.
Obtaining work authorization and securing stable employment are additional barriers preventing refugees from affording or accessing disaster preparedness services. Natural disasters in Texas also cause administrative backlogs, leaving those seeking document renewals unattended and unable to access disaster preparedness resources. Some Texas laws have created a climate of fear, as undocumented individuals may be discouraged by policies that restrict city police and universities from providing certain rights or services. It has also been reported that Texas has shown reluctance to restore disrupted refugee programs aimed at building progressive refugee communities. Mental and physical health professionals are needed to serve refugees who experience trauma from natural disasters, and these services must also overcome cultural and linguistic barriers to be effective. The local service infrastructure appears inadequate in delivering welfare services to refugees, despite their recognized status as a special-needs aggregate. Adding to these challenges, low-wage immigrants and refugees have been exploited for hurricane recovery work, including debris removal and rebuilding efforts.
Conclusion
Special-needs communities like refugees should be equally included in and entitled to disaster preparedness resources as the general population. The services provided must be consistent with human rights laws. Political and legal frameworks — and the laws derived from them — should be designed for the welfare of this special community so that their unique needs can be addressed competently and compassionately.
References
Census.gov. (2019). Quick facts: Texas. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/TX#
GCIR (Grantmakers Concerned with Immigrants and Refugees). (2017, September 25). The impact of natural disasters on immigrants and refugees in the United States: What funders need to know in the immediate term. Retrieved from
Krogstad, J. M. (2019, October 7). Key facts about refugees to the US. Fact Tank. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/10/07/key-facts-about-refugees-to-the-u-s/
McConnell, S. (2020, January 13). Data shows Texas resettled more refugees than any other state in the last decade. The Texan.News. Retrieved from
NASA. (2017). Natural and man-made hazards in the state of Texas. Retrieved from https://nisar.jpl.nasa.gov/files/nisar/NISAR_Applications_Hazards_Texas.pdf
National Immigration Forum. (2020, November 5). Fact sheet: U.S. refugee resettlement. Retrieved from https://immigrationforum.org/article/fact-sheet-u-s-refugee-resettlement/
Office of the Texas Governor, Greg Abbott. (n.d.). Emergency management. Retrieved from https://gov.texas.gov/organization/disabilities/emergency_management
Refugee Empowerment Center. (n.d.). Home. Retrieved from https://refugeeempowerment.org/
Refugee Services of Texas. (n.d.). Who we are? Retrieved from https://www.rstx.org/who-we-are/faqs.html
Texas City. (n.d.). Disaster planning. Retrieved from
Texas General Land Office. (n.d.). Disaster preparedness. Retrieved from https://recovery.texas.gov/preparedness/index.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.