Three Books on Preaching: Improving Homily Effectiveness
This paper offers a comparative analysis of three books on Christian preaching: Daniel E. Harris's We Speak the Word of the Lord, Alfred McBride's How to Make Homilies Better, Briefer, and Bolder, and James Wallace's Preaching to the Hungers of the Heart. Though each book shares the common goal of improving homily effectiveness, the authors differ in their approaches. Harris emphasizes practical planning and audience connection; McBride draws on saints and Church history to offer step-by-step guidance; and Wallace focuses on meeting the spiritual and emotional hungers of modern congregations. The paper identifies key similarities and differences across the three texts and evaluates their relative readability, scholarly depth, and practical utility for working preachers.
- Introduction: Overview of three books and their shared purpose
- Main Ideas of Each Book: Core arguments of Harris, McBride, and Wallace
- Similarities and Differences: Comparative analysis of audience awareness and authenticity
- Format and Readability: Evaluating each book's structure and accessibility
- Conclusion: Final rankings by readability, interest, and scholarship
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly organizes its comparison by first treating each book individually before moving to a direct comparative analysis, which keeps the argument easy to follow.
- Concrete examples—such as Harris's two contrasting sermons on the prodigal son—ground abstract claims about preaching technique in specific, memorable illustrations.
- The paper balances content analysis with an evaluation of each book's format and readability, offering practical guidance to prospective readers.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates comparative synthesis: the writer does not simply summarize each book in isolation but draws out thematic parallels and contrasts across all three works, showing how different authors arrive at related conclusions through different methods. Footnote citations are used to anchor every claim to a specific page, modeling responsible use of primary sources in a review essay.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction identifying all three texts and their shared purpose. A "Main Ideas" section then treats each book individually in turn. A "Similarities and Differences" section moves into comparative analysis, noting shared commitments (audience awareness, Christlike authenticity) alongside differences in tone and scholarly weight. A short evaluative paragraph on format and readability precedes a brief conclusion that ranks the books by different criteria—ease of reading, narrative interest, and scholarly depth.
Introduction
We Speak the Word of the Lord: A Practical Plan for More Effective Preaching by Harris, How to Make Homilies Better, Briefer, and Bolder by McBride, and Preaching to the Hungers of the Heart by Wallace all share the same objective: to improve one's preaching. However, their approaches differ, and the areas on which each author focuses reveal distinct preoccupations. This paper discusses the main ideas of each book, their similarities and differences, and how all three compare and contrast with one another.
Bibliography
Harris, Daniel E. We Speak the Word of the Lord: A Practical Plan for More Effective Preaching. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001.
McBride, Alfred. How to Make Homilies Better, Briefer, and Bolder. Huntington, Indiana: Our Sunday Visitor, 2007.
Wallace, James. Preaching to the Hungers of the Heart: The Homily on Feasts and Within the Rites. Collegeville, Minnesota: Liturgical Press, 2002.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.