This paper critically examines the debates surrounding Turkey's recent military conscription reforms, arguing that the primary motivation is professionalism rather than financial gain. It surveys the historical roots of conscription in the late Ottoman and early Republican eras, outlines the specific reform proposals — including age-based payout exemptions and alternatives for conscientious objectors — and evaluates the public controversies these proposals generated. The paper then presents evidence that rising casualties from PKK attacks, inexperienced servicemen, and a "concept of peace" culture in the military are the real drivers behind reform. Cultural dimensions, including conscription as a masculine rite of passage, and the social pressure from families of fallen soldiers are also analyzed. The paper concludes that reforms reflect changing social ideology and the urgent need for a better-trained, professional military force.
Military conscription in Turkey has its roots in the late Ottoman Empire. The system was adopted as a means of providing the nation with a military workforce, and served as a tool of military modernization, especially in the Turkish Republic. According to Dogra Ozgur (2008), military conscription modernized the Turkish army through improvements to registration, surveillance, and census techniques, as well as by increasing the number of military personnel through a growing pool of conscripts (14). The system met the financial and social needs of the Turkish Republic, which was seeking a more productive rural and urban labor force — one it partly cultivated through the military barracks schooling system.
Turkey's conscription system remains highly institutionalized and is still a culturally and socially sanctified practice. However, in recent years, a government move to reform conscription has generated considerable public controversy. Public discussion has centered on factors such as financial pressure driving the government's reform agenda, as well as the use of policies touching on sensitive issues like homosexuality to advance what critics see as economic logic. This paper argues that reforms to Turkey's military conscription are primarily a means of achieving much-needed professionalism in the military, rather than a vehicle for economic or financial gains by the government.
Military service in Turkey is mandatory for every young man from the age of 20, unless he has been declared unfit for service on health grounds or is enrolled in a higher education institution, which allows postponement until completion of studies (Dogra 15). Military service was shortened in 2003, which reduced the number of registered conscripts by 17%. It also resulted in university graduates serving as privates for six months or as reserve officers for twelve months (Dogra 15). The recruitment system adopted at that time was considered effective, having reduced the number of deserters by 2003. However, the rise in desertions by 2007 has been associated with the ongoing conflict in the southeast against the PKK (Kurdistan Workers' Party). The Minister of National Defense estimated the desertion rate at 1.5% by 2007, while unofficial reports placed the figure at approximately 400,000 (Dogra 15). This high desertion rate is a major catalyst for conscription reform, as the government seeks to improve military professionalism and reduce the loss of young lives.
The Turkish cabinet has proposed reforming military conscription by allowing Turkish nationals aged 30 or above to be exempted from military obligations and a preliminary 21-day basic training course upon payment of 30,000 liras (Parkinson 1). Turkish nationals living abroad for at least three years may pay €10,000 for exemption with no age limit. Other proposed exemptions include provisions for servicemen who can prove homosexuality, and for conscientious objectors who opt for non-military forms of public service. Reports indicate that men over 40 are fully exempted from military service, while those between the ages of 30 and 40 are required to complete a 21-day training course (Seibert 1).
Joe Parkinson (2011) notes that financial payouts for exemption from military service are not new in Turkish history, particularly for those living and working abroad. One argument advanced in press reports is that these payouts are a means for the government to raise revenue to donate to families who have lost soldiers in combat. The government was reportedly expecting 100,000 male citizens to make such payments, potentially raising $1.5 billion in return (Parkinson 1). The article further notes that Turkey has used military service payouts on two previous occasions. In 1999, following devastating earthquakes in the northwest, the government raised money from young men who paid to be exempted from four weeks of basic training — a scheme that generated approximately one billion lira in state revenue. Critics therefore argue that the current reforms are similarly designed to boost public finances at a time when economic growth is slowing. Although Turkey's economy was projected to grow between 7% and 8% in 2011 after a 9% increase in 2010, signs of slowdown were emerging by 2012, alongside a growing current account deficit equivalent to 9% of GDP — leaving the economy exposed to external shocks (Parkinson 1).
A second controversy concerns the fairness of the payout scheme. According to Thomas Seibert (2011), soldiers fighting the PKK are overwhelmingly from poor families, while sons of wealthy families have long used personal connections to officials to avoid compulsory military service (1). Critics argue that the new payment scheme will deepen this imbalance, since young men from poor families cannot easily access bank credit to meet the payout requirement. The Association of Martyrs' Families has accused the government of designing the reforms to benefit a small group of wealthy voters (Seibert 1).
Despite these controversies, this analysis concludes that reforms to the military conscription process are principally aimed at achieving greater professionalism in the military. This conclusion is rooted in the intensifying and violent attacks by the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) over recent years, which have resulted in thousands of military deaths. According to Markar Esayan (2011), PKK militants have targeted villages and military convoys — for example in Karliova — killing 200 unarmed soldiers, 10 troops, and injuring 70 more. The central challenge the conscription system faces is the deployment of inexperienced young men directly into active conflict zones. This inexperience leads to costly mistakes, including violations of regulations governing the transport of ammunition and personnel, resulting in tragedies such as the Afyon explosion. Esayan (2011) identifies that transporting unarmed military servicemen in unarmored buses through PKK-prone regions violated Articles 100 and 103 of the relevant military code.
The need for reform is further underscored by the scale of Turkey's military. Although Turkey maintains one of the largest armed forces in NATO, its strength relies heavily on approximately 465,000 citizens in compulsory service (Esayan 1). The challenge of achieving genuine professionalism within such a force is compounded by inexperience and by a prevailing "concept of peace" mentality — a disposition among servicemen that leaves them psychologically and tactically unprepared for armed conflict.
The "concept of peace" and the lack of combat experience have left the majority of young servicemen unprepared for war. The Association of Martyrs' Families and outlets such as The National have identified this as a leading cause of the high death toll among military personnel. This is considered a primary reason for the many young men killed in attacks by the Kurdistan Workers' Party, which has been waging an insurgency since 1984 (Kuru 1). Parents, speaking through bodies like the Association of Martyrs' Families, maintain that their sons died due to inadequate training before being sent into combat. This pressure has driven army generals and Prime Minister Erdoğan to restructure the armed forces and deploy professional soldiers along the southeastern borders specifically to address the civil conflict with the PKK.
"Masculinity, tradition, and cultural respect for the military"
"Non-military service alternatives and homosexuality exemption"
Overall, the recent reforms to the military conscription process cannot be attributed primarily to a need to raise government revenue or stimulate economic recovery. Nor are they a strategy by the military elite to benefit the sons of wealthy, politically connected families while marginalizing those from lower-class backgrounds. The reform process is fundamentally a response to a changing social ideology that recognizes the trauma military service inflicts on young men and their families.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.