This paper examines a growing trend in higher education: the move away from traditional final examinations as the primary measure of student performance. Drawing on evidence from education researchers and a notable university policy change, the paper argues that examinations measure only a narrow range of student abilities and can produce counterproductive stress. It discusses alternative assessment methods — including papers, projects, and application-based tasks — while acknowledging criticism of the shift. The paper concludes that a more diverse assessment landscape better honors varied learning styles and more accurately reflects a student's true knowledge and capabilities.
Recently, professors at a major university ceased giving final exams as part of their overall assessment of student performance (Strauss, 2010). In a radical transformation of official college policy, the Faculty of Arts and Sciences voted to eliminate exams and require professors who wish to administer them to file an application form. The reverse used to be true: exams were the norm, and professors wishing to opt out would have to ask for permission.
What has caused this startling turn of events? Evidence, for one. In Test Problems: Seven Reasons Why Standardized Tests Are Not Working, Sadker & Zittleman (n.d.) outline empirical evidence supporting a shift away from examinations as the primary measure of student success. Examinations do measure a certain type of achievement, but they should not be used as the only method of gauging student progress and performance. One of the core reasons cited by Sadker & Zittleman (n.d.) is student stress.
Examinations measure a narrow bandwidth of student achievement. These tests show how well some students perform under pressure, but they fail to account for individual differences in the psychological experience of a one-shot, high-stakes evaluation. When an examination has a strong bearing on the final grade, a certain degree of stress can override the actual retention and acquisition of knowledge that has taken place. Some students might perform better with a more nuanced approach to assessment, which is one reason why examinations are being phased out of schools and universities.
As researchers have noted, standardized testing captures only a limited picture of what a student knows and can do. The pressure of a timed, single-occasion exam introduces variables that have little to do with genuine learning, making such tests an incomplete and sometimes misleading measure of academic achievement.
"We know that the typical multiple-choice and short-answer tests aren't the only way, or necessarily the best way, to gauge a student's knowledge and abilities" ("How Should We Measure Student Learning? The Many Forms of Assessment," n.d.). Application-based assessments are one alternative to examinations. Papers and creative projects are other types of end-of-year assessments that can replace examinations as the primary means of evaluation. Formal examinations, including multiple choice and short answer tests, are becoming just one of a broad range of ways educators practice educational assessment.
"Assessment remains essential for students and teachers"
"Critics defend exams for standardization and accountability"
The changing face of education reflects a more diverse landscape in which multiple styles of learning and achievement are honored. After all, a test score does not predict student success or the ability to apply knowledge to a real-world scenario.
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.